APPROXIMATE PURCHASE DATE: now to two months
BUDGET RANGE: US$500-750
SYSTEM USAGE FROM MOST TO LEAST IMPORTANT: Computational intensive application like Matlab, hardware synthesis software, spice simulations etc...Almost zero gaming/graphic.
OVERCLOCKING: no
Hi,
I'm trying to build a powerful computer oriented towards 'computing power'. Stuff like Matlab, Synthesis software, Spice simulations etc...Most of the information I can find is related to gaming/graphics, which I'm not really interested...Could someone point me into the right direction?
Here are a few questions that come to mind:
Motherboard: any special spec to look for here (bus speed etc...?).
CPU: These days, is AMD or Intel making the best 'computing' CPU?
Graphic Card: I know that whatever onboard graphic card that could be on the motherboard would be fine for me. However, I wonder if getting a 'cheap' graphic card would offload the motherboard to do more useful stuff...
Same question for the soundcard...
RAM: Any spec here to look for? How much is recommended?
Case: Are there nice small case that could handle whatever is recommended above?
We have almost the same application except that i play games and watch HDTV on my PC. I use my PC for Design and Circuit Simulation. I use Mathlab 2009 as well.
Get a Quad-Core as a minimum and use more memory. My configuration is below and i use 8 Gbyte on my PC. Memory of 4G will do but i see improvement when i use 8G of RAM. Math LAB and CAD/CAE tools use up all available memory on your PC.
BIGGEST IMPACT FOR THE NEED YOU DESCRIBE.....QUAD-CORE AND MORE MEMORY.
NVIDIA is promoting its CUDA tools which is an option to port the math-intensive part of the software on the GPU. Frankly speaking i dont see any support from CADENCE or SYSNOPSIS. Thats one incentive to purchase an NVDIA card for future feature. Again as of today no support from CADENCE /SYSNOPSYS that I'm aware of.
Since simulation takes a lot of time i always use Intel CPU and Intel Chipset. Its just me that a run time of 4 to >16 hrs i can't afford freeze or hang-up from un-reliable hardware.
For motherboard my preference is ASUS(W/Intel Chipset) or Intel Motherboard. Again when running simulation or processis that runs for > 16hrs @ 100%CPU no room for hang-ups.
Motherboard with built-in GPU will be good enough.
Between AMD and Intel you can hardly feel the difference. The reason i opted for Intel is due to HW BUG of Barcelona when it came out. AMD chips may have an edge on high Memory application due to built-in Memory-controller. The difference can be very small. AMD HW tends to be cheaper.
Your budget is pretty small....
------------------------------Q6600: Maximus Formula: Zalman 9700LED8GByte: Crucial Ballistics 4-4-4-12: PC6400; Vista Ultimate-64BFG XOC 4890; Disp: 70 Inch HDTV: Hauppage 2250 HDTV Tuner1.4TByte: 2x750Gbyte; RAID0; Case: Antec 900: PS:Antec Quatro 850
Reply to leon2006
I'm looking at similar issues for a home_brew polymer dynamics machine. The INTEL i920 seems to have it all-over AMD 940/955 both for FP speed and ability of a mobo to transparently support lots of fast ram. But, for complete kit (excluding LCD) coming-in around $1000+ is a struggle.
Well with poor older gen IGP perhaps going with a discrete may be fine but with a 780G or even better 790GX who needs one - even less so for your needs Doable even under $500 hehe Maybe with the whole fanless/passive theme you could get a Scythe Shuriken or a Zalman CNPS7500 CPU cooler for the super silent rig? This is portable enuff to carry over to that LCD TV and hook up via HDMI to double up as a HTPC too ^^
Message edited by batuchka on 05-28-2009 at 11:57:41 AM
One thing to consider is if Matlab and the other programs can fully use a quad core. If they only use 1 or 2 cores, then you'd be better off with a faster dual core. You should find out before buying.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.