OCZ StealthXStream OCZ700SXS 700W ATX12V / EPS12V SLI Ready CrossFire Ready Active PFC Power Supply - Retail
SAPPHIRE 100259-1GL Radeon HD 4870 1GB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready CrossFire Supported Video Card
Kingston HyperX T1 Series 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 1066 (PC2 8500) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory Model
Or other option for less than 60 USD ??
Western Digital Caviar Black WD6401AALS 640GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive - OEM or something cheaper, dont need a big HD
ASUS VH222H Black 21.5" 5ms Widescreen 16:9 LCD HDMI Monitor Built in Speakers - Retail 160 USD
So basicaly the big dif, is the CPU/MOBO combo and the size of the monitor.
I really enjoy the idea of have a big LCD screen 23+
But what about the 200 mhz, plus 1 more core, really worth the 2 inch less in the size of the lcd? and what about that mobo in the combo of the 940 model. And the mobo in the 720 model combo is good?
As far as games go, we see a huge 60% performance jump from going single-core to dual-core, and a further 25% leap from dual- to triple-core. Quad cores offer no benefits in the sampling of games we tested. While more games might change the landscape a little, we think the triple-core Phenom II X3s are looking good as a low-cost gaming option.
If u planning to do multi threaded applications on top of gaming then ya quads are the way to go ^^ Else best solution is X3 with more muscle in GPU department hehe As a system builber though i can tell you than peeps with extremely modest needs are having stunning processing power with an el cheapo P2X3 710 + 760/780G chipset for a number crunching rig these days!
Message edited by batuchka on 05-29-2009 at 10:25:08 AM
I would go with the second choice for two BIG reasons....first quad cores and going to be a need to have thing soon enough...and with the 21" your resolution will be 1680x1050!
Wait its not that resolution....so imo if i where you i would buy any monitor in the 20-24" range that is either 1680x1050 or 1600x1200....you may think that having the full 1920x10xx resolution is cool and all but now when it costs an extra 100$ for each gpu upgrade(if you want max aa and af etc)...
The second option is the best, because games are beginning to use quads, and based on the chart above there is *no* reason not to get a quad.
Err based on the charts the blue bars (gaming) show that the gains from going tri to quad core is tied w.r.t single core So one great reason is to save on chip and pump into a more powerful GPU for a purely gaming rig if funds are tight?
Message edited by batuchka on 05-30-2009 at 03:33:53 AM
To get a big monitor for a low price, get this Samsung monitor http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna [...] u=A2479675 Be sure to use coupon code PS41S3BF?8?XC3 at checkout for a grand total of $160 with free shipping.