Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > OLD CPU comparison - which should I use?

OLD CPU comparison - which should I use?

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - OLD CPU comparison - which should I use?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Which CPU would you run on an old, secondary computer?




Warning, if you click on "see results", you won't be able to vote
Word :    Username :           
 

I have a couple of old computers I want to combine into one.

Which CPU would you go for?

Celeron D 352 3.2 (Cedar Mill core) --- in an eMachine case

or

Pentium 4 2.0A 2.0ghz (Northwood core) --- in a Dell case


I know the Celeron D is newer, but the P4 can handle multitasking. I'm not looking to play games... just have another computer around to network / store crap.

Thanks for your help!

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

IMO, celeron is a JUNK

------------------------------ If you like my answer, select me as the best answer.
------------------
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.". Albert Einstein.
------------------
Reply to saint19

Northwood P4's where known for good over clocking ability, but that Celeron running at 3.2 ghz is going to be hard to topple in mhz.

I have a Celeron D in the bog standard office pc and it does the job well considering the lost cost.

Reply to ulysses35

The Celeron D 3.2 GHz would be faster. It has 256k of cache (as opposed to the crippling 128k in the old Celeron) which is just enough to make it useful. The P4 would have to run around 2.9 or so to compete especially since it's one of the earlier ones with the slower FSB and I'm assuming 512k of cache.

------------------------------ Playing X-Men Origins: Wolverine Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @3.24 Brisbane | GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-DS4 | 4GB Mushkin DDR2 1066 | Plextor 760A| 2x 3850 512M CF| WD 1TB Black| Fortron Blue Storm II 500W | APEVIA X-Dreamer Black | Win XP Pro & Vista Buisness 32bit
Reply to megamanx00
- 0 +

Done a bit of checking up on the overclockablility of the P4s. That's sitting on a dell motherboard. That'd limit me pretty good, unless I can use ClockGen PLL or similar software. Celeron D is kind of junk... I'm just still not sure because the P4 is just damn old. Any more ideas guys?

Reply to diznanl

^If you have a locked BIOS do a BSEL mod + vmod.

------------------------------ http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2617/3815217176_0a5be7955d_o.gif
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3553/3818083596_1a772f7162_o.gif
Reply to Shadow703793
- 0 +

Shadow703793 wrote :

^If you have a locked BIOS do a BSEL mod + vmod.



If I DIDN'T do the mod, which CPU would you suggest?

Reply to diznanl
- 1 +

Socket 775 Celery

Reply to Newf

Wow, a lot of FUD in this thread so let's clear it up: The Celeron D 352 a 3.2GHz, 533 fsb Cedarmill CPU with 512KB L2 cache and socket 775 as newf stated above. The p4 is a 2.0 GHz, 400 fsb, C1 stepping northwood core with 512KB L2 cache on the antiquated socket 478. The P4 does not have hyperthreading, and can only reach a 2.66GHz speed with pinmod. The Cedermill Celeron, on the other hand, would upright kick the snot out of that old P4. It is a known overclocker, and can do 4.8GHz/800 fsb with just a couple pin mods. Thanks to it's 65nm design, the Celeron has an acceptable TDP, with C1 revisions being only 65 watt. Finally, the Celeron offers more advanced features, such as SSE3, xbit, and 64 bit capability. The fact that it is on LGA 775 means there is a good chance that the chipset inside that Emachine will also support Pentium D processors for a future upgrade.

 

Why anyone here would even think about choosing the P4 over the Celeron, can only be because they don't have a flippin clue about the CPUs being discussed, and instead are relying on their (incorrect) knee-jerk reactions.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by joefriday on 09-03-2009 at 04:07:23 AM
Reply to joefriday
- 0 +

joefriday wrote :

Wow, a lot of FUD in this thread so let's clear it up: The Celeron D 352 a 3.2GHz, 533 fsb Cedarmill CPU with 512KB L2 cache and socket 775 as newf stated above. The p4 is a 2.0 GHz, 400 fsb, C1 stepping northwood core with 512KB L2 cache on the antiquated socket 478. The P4 does not have hyperthreading, and can only reach a 2.66GHz speed with pinmod. The Cedermill Celeron, on the other hand, would upright kick the snot out of that old P4. It is a known overclocker, and can do 4.8GHz/800 fsb with just a couple pin mods. Thanks to it's 65nm design, the Celeron has an acceptable TDP, with C1 revisions being only 65 watt. Finally, the Celeron offers more advanced features, such as SSE3, xbit, and 64 bit capability. The fact that it is on LGA 775 means there is a good chance that the chipset inside that Emachine will also support Pentium D processors for a future upgrade.

Why anyone here would even think about choosing the P4 over the Celeron, can only be because they don't have a flippin clue about the CPUs being discussed, and instead are relying on their (incorrect) knee-jerk reactions.



Thanks JoeFriday. Nail in the coffin for the P4... I'll be using the celery.

Reply to diznanl

+1 for the Celeron. I managed to get a Celeron 315 to 3.6Ghz :P

------------------------------ http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2617/3815217176_0a5be7955d_o.gif
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3553/3818083596_1a772f7162_o.gif
Reply to Shadow703793
- 0 +

Shadow703793 wrote :

+1 for the Celeron. I managed to get a Celeron 315 to 3.6Ghz :P



I've never done a pin-mod. I might try clockgen first. BSEL mod + vmod looks a little bit daunting. I did some searches but can't find the right pins to clip/cover. Any idea where I can find these?

Go celery :sol:

Reply to diznanl
- 0 +

Why mod it ot overclock if its for general use and storage, it will be fast enough for internet browsing, file sharing and the likes, keep it stock and stable

------------------------------ CM Scout Case|Asus P5Q|Intel 7200 @ 3.8ghz|Artic Freezer 7|4Gb Tracer 1066mhz 5,5,5,12|HD 4870 @ 850/4400mhz|750w Corsair TX|1Tb Samsung F1|1Tb Hitachi 7500k|500Gb Seagate|250Gb Samsung|80Gb WD in Icy Box|2x22" 1650x1080|G9 mouse|G15 KB Win7|Vista|XP|Mint
Reply to moricon
- 0 +

moricon wrote :

Why mod it ot overclock if its for general use and storage, it will be fast enough for internet browsing, file sharing and the likes, keep it stock and stable



Excellent point... but I want to play with it a bit. Nothing to extreme.

I updated to the latest INTEL bios for the D101GGC (vs the eMachines one). Didn't give me any new options to up the FSB, but the memory clock is still at 400mhz.

Will proably leave it, but will try clockgen to get it up a little bit.


Message edited by diznanl on 09-04-2009 at 08:14:18 PM
Reply to diznanl
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > OLD CPU comparison - which should I use?
Go to:

There are 1198 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them