Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Intel Core 2 Duo vs Pentium Dual Core

Intel Core 2 Duo vs Pentium Dual Core

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - Intel Core 2 Duo vs Pentium Dual Core

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Ok, so I have been reading around and can't seem to get a clear answer. What is the real difference between pentium dual core processors and core 2 duo processors? If you had two running side by side with the same clock, which would perform better? Thanks

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Core 2 duo has a more advanced microarchitecture, so it would run faster.

------------------------------ Core i7 920 @3.8ghz|Foxconn Renaissance Motherboard|2 GTX 260s in SLI|750 Watt PSU|6 GB RAM|64 GB Kingston SSDNow V-Series|Windows 7
Reply to nonxcarbonx

Pentium dual core have the same microarchitecture actually. It's mostly just that the Core 2 Duos have more cache, and tend to have higher clock speeds.

------------------------------ Asus P6T deluxe
i7 965 @ 4.2GHz (200*21), 1.384V
12GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 CAS 7
Reply to cjl

cjl wrote :

Pentium dual core have the same microarchitecture actually. It's mostly just that the Core 2 Duos have more cache, and tend to have higher clock speeds.




Exactly, exact same except for cache, and cach only makes 2-5% difference. Core 2 like higer FSB, but seems like the pentiums have the bigger multipliers, so both OC extremly well.

Reply to daship

hmm that's a good topic.

for example lets see, what the diff between this one other than the price

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115206

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819116091

and also keep in mind that core 2 duo is much faster than the Dual Core even though they both have the same sepcs.

Reply to surda

It also depends on which "pentium dual cores" we're talking about. The P4 8xx and 9xx are based off the old netbust arch, and would be slower. The newer pentiums are based of the same arch as the C2D line, and would be ever so slightly slower due to the lower cache/FSB. Between these two, the C2D should be faster, within reason of course.

------------------------------ The voice of REASON
Do NOT feed the TROLLS!
Always a DEMON!
Reply to 4745454b

that dont give us a reason on why on these 2 links any should be faster than the other, becaouse they both use the same methods, unless there is something els

Reply to surda

surda wrote :

hmm that's a good topic.

 

for example lets see, what the diff between this one other than the price

 

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115206

 

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819116091

 

and also keep in mind that core 2 duo is much faster than the Dual Core even though they both have the same sepcs.


No, it isn't much faster. It's a bit faster (~5%-10% at best). The current "Pentium Dual Core" CPUs are different from the old Pentium D, which ran hot and was nowhere near as fast as a core 2 duo. The reason the pentium in your link is slower is because of the cache though - the one linked here has 2MB cache, vs 3MB for the Core. Other than that, they are identical, which is why there isn't a whole lot of difference.


Message edited by cjl on 09-03-2009 at 08:53:50 AM
------------------------------ Asus P6T deluxe
i7 965 @ 4.2GHz (200*21), 1.384V
12GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 CAS 7
Reply to cjl

? Netbust had horrible IPC, so even if it was clocked at the same frequency as a C2D based chip, it would be "slower". There is more to a chip then just L2 cache and FSB.

------------------------------ The voice of REASON
Do NOT feed the TROLLS!
Always a DEMON!
Reply to 4745454b

4745454b wrote :

? Netbust had horrible IPC, so even if it was clocked at the same frequency as a C2D based chip, it would be "slower". There is more to a chip then just L2 cache and FSB.


Agreed. Reading over my last post, it's a bit unclear, but when I say Pentium in that final statement, I'm referring to the pentium dual core in the newegg link (which is the same die as a Core 2, but with 1MB less cache).

------------------------------ Asus P6T deluxe
i7 965 @ 4.2GHz (200*21), 1.384V
12GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 CAS 7
Reply to cjl

ok i viewed some benchmarks about those 2 cpus,

there is actually just a little-bit of extra performance for the E7400 over the E6300, and that is not even noticeable.

the E7400 is a little faster Maybe by 5%, is because it have more Cache, just 1 extra mg

but keep in mind that E7400 lacks of IV (Intel virtualisation) thats all.

as in for differences between Dual core vs Core 2 duo, it all depends on which ones your getting, as in some Dual cores are faster than Core 2 duo,

because they both have 2 cores
they both don't have hyper threading
alot of them have the same FSB
they both use intel 64

so basically alot of them are in common, it all matters on which one you chose as there is no real difference between them both.

hope that helps.

Reply to surda

surda wrote :

ok i viewed some benchmarks about those 2 cpus,

there is actually just a little-bit of extra performance for the E7400 over the E6300, and that is not even noticeable.

the E7400 is a little faster Maybe by 5%, is because it have more Cache, just 1 extra mg

but keep in mind that E7400 lacks of IV (Intel virtualisation) thats all.



The virtualization is the only possible deal-breaker for some, as it is required for XP mode on Win 7. Though I doubt many of us would really need the XP mode, it may be a nice feature to have just in case.

If your budget doesn't allow it, there is nothing wrong with a Pentium Dual-Core (not Pentium D). The speed difference with day-to-day tasks and gaming aren't actually noticeable. This would probably matter though with video encoding, the small 5 second differences in benchmarks may relfect as minutes when you're encoding a few hours of video.

Reply to amnotanoobie

amnotanoobie wrote :

The virtualization is the only possible deal-breaker for some, as it is required for XP mode on Win 7. Though I doubt many of us would really need the XP mode, it may be a nice feature to have just in case.

If your budget doesn't allow it, there is nothing wrong with a Pentium Dual-Core (not Pentium D). The speed difference with day-to-day tasks and gaming aren't actually noticeable. This would probably matter though with video encoding, the small 5 second differences in benchmarks may relfect as minutes when you're encoding a few hours of video.




If you working with video you should be on a quad, preferably a i7.

Reply to daship

daship wrote :

If you working with video you should be on a quad, preferably a i7.



But of course you can't count out those who can't even afford to buy even a branded psu.

Reply to amnotanoobie

Thanks for your replies everyone, I was just wondering as I'm getting rid of my present laptop that runs a dual core pentium. I'm going to get a much more powerful core 2 duo in my new one. Thanks!

P.S: Just for the record, I do have a quad, in my desktop, and an i7 mobo so I think im set for video encoding ;)

Reply to carpenma
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Intel Core 2 Duo vs Pentium Dual Core
Go to:

There are 1021 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them