Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > [Solved] CPU link width 8bit vs 16bit??

[Solved] CPU link width 8bit vs 16bit??

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - [Solved] CPU link width 8bit vs 16bit??

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!

Best answer from Devastator_uk.

Word :    Username :           
 

ok, so today ive been screwing around crashing and OCing my comp and came across a setting to set my CPU link width to either 8bit or 16bit.. what is it?? id assume that 16bit is better but idk, want some oppinions first.

btw, finally got my HT speed to 2600mhz!! =]

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/642034.png
16 bits will provide more bandwidth, so potentially more performance. However the wider the bus, the more chance of data corruption (the error checking and correction should prevent it from crashing but packets have to be resent so loss of performance), so you may have to lower the frequency of the HT to compensate. So in some cases you may be better leaving it at 8 bits, but I've not found any problems running at 16 bits (although mine runs at only 2000MHz because of maximum it supports).
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

anyone wish to enlighten me...?

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/642034.png
Reply to rambo117

check your owners manual

you'll get better answers if you provide better info: processor? motherboard?

------------------------------ E8400 : GA-EP35-DS3L : mushkin 4GB DDR2 800 : HD 2600PRO : 450W ATX12V : Windows 7
Reply to 505090

i have a link to my config, just click the more information tab. and i already looked through the manuel, said nothing about the cpu link width..

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/642034.png
Reply to rambo117

can't find it int he manual either try contacting gigabyte

------------------------------ E8400 : GA-EP35-DS3L : mushkin 4GB DDR2 800 : HD 2600PRO : 450W ATX12V : Windows 7
Reply to 505090
Best answer

16 bits will provide more bandwidth, so potentially more performance. However the wider the bus, the more chance of data corruption (the error checking and correction should prevent it from crashing but packets have to be resent so loss of performance), so you may have to lower the frequency of the HT to compensate. So in some cases you may be better leaving it at 8 bits, but I've not found any problems running at 16 bits (although mine runs at only 2000MHz because of maximum it supports).

------------------------------ CPU: PhenomII X4 955 BE ; RAM: 8GiB
OS: BSD, Linux, Solaris & Windows (use VirtualBox)
Reply to Devastator_uk

Devastator_uk wrote :

16 bits will provide more bandwidth, so potentially more performance. However the wider the bus, the more chance of data corruption (the error checking and correction should prevent it from crashing but packets have to be resent so loss of performance), so you may have to lower the frequency of the HT to compensate. So in some cases you may be better leaving it at 8 bits, but I've not found any problems running at 16 bits (although mine runs at only 2000MHz because of maximum it supports).


thanks devastator! i'll give it a shot with 16bit. if its unstable with my 2600ht oc, then ill just leave it set to auto.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/642034.png
Reply to rambo117
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > [Solved] CPU link width 8bit vs 16bit??
Go to:

There are 1265 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them