I am looking for the one that would suit my needs. I will be Programming a Lot, and gaming quite a bit aswell. Which one is better for me? (Overclocked or Normal)
What is your budget?
For entire system, roughly 1900. Though my Case + CPU cooler + 8 LED fans for it is around $400 - 450.
i originally had a build plan all layed out for the 955 cpu but just read some i5 reviews and benchmarks and it smokes 955 many areas. in my opinion the i5 has crippled any cometition from AMD in performance and price.
go i5. it will cost you the same as just about any 955 configuration and its a better cpu/build.
The i7 860 is almost a must for a budget of roughly 1500, get it and 2 4890s and enjoy the awesomeness, or wait until the ATI 5000 series comes out and enjoy the even more awesome awesomeness!
Yea I agree....even though there is speculation that AMD will slash the current price on their quads, whatever you save on a 955 build will not compensate for the performance you lose by not chosing the 750...Basically there is no reason to go AMD at this point in time, specially when an i5 build is cheaper than a 955 build ATM...
If i get a V10 CPU Cooler (i REALLY want one), will it fit on a i5 CPU?
i find the v10 needlessly expensive, you might need to buy an aditional converter bracket to fit it onto the lga 1156 socket
Where could i buy that bracket?
i dont think they have one yet as the i5 is brand new, might have to wait a few weeks.
The V10 is a horrible idea, it doesn't perform any better than the normal high end coolers but it is bulky, hard to install, and it can bend your motherboard.
I5 all the way. Going the X4 route would only be worth it if the 965 was 150 dollars
If i were to buy an i5, which cooler would you recommend, and the same for a Phenom 955.
Not even.... I would rather spend 209.99 for the 750 than save 60 bucks and regret it later down the road.... i5 all the way.....
http://www.frostytech.com/top5heatsinks.cfm
this should help you pick a cooler.
Those cannot hold a core i5.
This one looks interesting and works with the I5
http://www.thermaltakeusa.com/Prod [...] 17&ID=1904
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 0Heatsinks
currently their are only 2 lga 1156 cpu heatsinks i can find on newegg, hope this helps.
This one should be an ok cooler.... AC and Sunbeam will soon have a new cooler as well...
Cooler Master Intel Core i5 compatible Hyper TX3 Socket 775/1156/AMD 130W 92mm
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6835103064
As far as I know the mounting hardware is the same both for 775 and 1156... Anyone know if this is 100% accurate? If a 775 cooler is compatible with a 1156 socket using the exact same hardware then it looks like there is no difference at all... unless I missed something here....
I'll just buy one and try it ^_^
im looking at a pic of the 1156 and 775 stock coolers and they look almost identical in size, but just to be sure i wouldent assume they are the same.
Well if you look at the pictures on Newegg you will see that the Coolermaster comes only with the push pins and the AM3 mounting hardware... That normally means it will work with both sockets w/o needing anymore hardware.....
| paperfox wrote : im looking at a pic of the 1156 and 775 stock coolers and they look almost identical in size, but just to be sure i wouldent assume they are the same. |
They are not, there's a 3mm difference.
So why is there only 2 coolers to choose from? I would asume that the Egg would have at least 10 coolers to choose from, unless there is another site that has more of a variety you are basically screwed waiting till they are in stock...
Anyways here are a couple to choose from :
http://www.quietpcusa.com/CPU-Cool [...] ID=6433848
Well Noctua released a SE2 edition of their NH U12P cooler, 775/1156/1366 compatible. Not sure about the availability in the US though...
i remember when lga 1366 came out newegg only had like 3 coolers out then. but a week later their where tons of mounting brackets for sale.
Yea it's a matter of time .... Next week we should see around 10-15 more available....
Some LGA1156 motherboards have sockets for a LGA1366 cooler, make sure you check which ones have the option. The i5 750 = Q9550 = P2 955. Spend a bit more money and get the i7 860 or the i7 920.
| dirtmountain wrote : Some LGA1156 motherboards have sockets for a LGA1366 cooler, make sure you check which ones have the option. The i5 750 = Q9550 = P2 955. Spend a bit more money and get the i7 860 or the i7 920. |
Am i reading that post correct an i5 750 is equal to a Q9550 which is equal to a p2 955? from what I have seen the i5 750 gives either of those 2 cpu's a floggin lol
The 750 is as equal as the Q9650 which is hilarious because the 9650 is 320 dollars
I can understand that, taking advantage of 775 owners who don't want to upgrade their motherboard. Intel is the same as any other corporation, money first.
Edit: also on Newegg, the 9650 includes a free bunny! woohoo!
| PsychoSaysDie wrote : The 750 is as equal as the Q9650 which is hilarious because the 9650 is 320 dollars |
Intel should be lowering those prices as well once the i5 has saturated the market......
You know something else that is funny?
Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 269.99$....... 60 dollars more expensive than the 750.....
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115054
| OvrClkr wrote : Intel should be lowering those prices as well once the i5 has saturated the market......
|
Intel has always been retarded with 775 chip prices
Well at least you get to brag about the Bunny gift you get.......
on the other hand, that C2D overclocks very well....
I wish Intel would drop the E8600 to like 129.99. Would be AWESoME
Would be sweet since a decent 775 mobo can be purchased for less than 100$
I understand the E8600 kicks the crap out of all the X2 chips but 260 is pure BS considering the I3's at 3Ghz are going to be like 140
Phenom II 550 is $110, OCs to around 3.6-3.9, similar clock for clock. Not quite as potent, but enough to remove any bottleneck in a non-well-clock-optimized game. For those, Phenom II 965s and Core i5s are the way to go.
Edit: I meant non-well-threading-optimized.
| smithereen wrote : Phenom II 550 is $110, OCs to around 3.6-3.9, similar clock for clock. Not quite as potent, but enough to remove any bottleneck in a non-well-clock-optimized game. For those, Phenom II 965s and Core i5s are the way to go. |
True but it is no threat to the E8600. It can easily do 4.5Ghz daily with a TRUE but again to that f'ing price. 199.99 would be a good start for it
If you need the performance of multiple GPUs, especially gaming, go i7 on LGA1366 for three features: triple channel RAM, 2xPCIE x16, and hyperthreading. If you don't need that level of performance, particularly in games (i.e. any single video card), look at Q9550 or Phenom II for user-visibly similar performance for a lot less money. And, if you can, wait 2-3 weeks because prices will likely change a lot, for many things. If LGA775 and AMD AM3 CPU prices drop much at all, i5 = FAIL; those who need the performance will get i7 on LGA1366 if they don't want future regrets, and those who don't need that level of performance will get it much cheaper with LGA775 or AM3, leaving i5 with no reason to exist.
| smithereen wrote : Phenom II 550 is $110, OCs to around 3.6-3.9, similar clock for clock. Not quite as potent, but enough to remove any bottleneck in a non-well-clock-optimized game. For those, Phenom II 965s and Core i5s are the way to go. |
Not really, the 550's normally can do 4.3Ghz on Air and 6.3Ghz on Ln2.... The 720's can achieve the same results but it is bit harder due to their stock clock....
http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?cp [...] &limit=100
http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?cp [...] &limit=100
Don't forget, the 550s have a good probability of stably unlocking as well.
[quotemsg=1980436,42,446940]Not really, the 550's normally can do 4.3Ghz on Air and 6.3Ghz on Ln2.... The 720's can achieve the same results but it is bit harder due to their stock clock....
What? In the link you provided, only the top 30 are above 4gHz... And CPU-Z validations are hardly representative of the norm at the best of times.
| OvrClkr wrote : Not really, the 550's normally can do 4.3Ghz on Air and 6.3Ghz on Ln2.... The 720's can achieve the same results but it is bit harder due to their stock clock....
|
I dont think i've ever seen a 550 owner on this site do more then 4Ghz. I have seen multiple people do 4.5+ with an E8500/E8600
| jtt283 wrote : If you need the performance of multiple GPUs, especially gaming, go i7 on LGA1366 for three features: triple channel RAM, 2xPCIE x16, and hyperthreading. If you don't need that level of performance, particularly in games (i.e. any single video card), look at Q9550 or Phenom II for user-visibly similar performance for a lot less money. And, if you can, wait 2-3 weeks because prices will likely change a lot, for many things. If LGA775 and AMD AM3 CPU prices drop much at all, i5 = FAIL; those who need the performance will get i7 on LGA1366 if they don't want future regrets, and those who don't need that level of performance will get it much cheaper with LGA775 or AM3, leaving i5 with no reason to exist. |
Except that it is the best gaming CPU for the money. It can easily handle 2 GPUs, much better than Phenom II or C2Q, and is at a very good price point. It has a great market, the high end. i7 has the elite high end while Phenom II has the low and midrange.
For budget gamers:
Phenom II + single midrange to high end card (4870 or 4890).
For high end gamers:
Core i5 or i7 LGA 1156 + 2 high end cards (2 4890s)
Ultra high end:
Core i7 920 + multi card setups (3 4890s, 2 GTX 295s)
That is how I see the market right now.
^ +1 The_Blood_Raven...
Here are two builds for comparison...
AM3: $1,144.86
Core i5:$ 997.90
The Core i5 build is roughly $200 cheaper, which will perform the same or better than the best AM3 chip.
| The_Blood_Raven wrote : Except that it is the best gaming CPU for the money. It can easily handle 2 GPUs, much better than Phenom II or C2Q, and is at a very good price point. It has a great market, the high end. i7 has the elite high end while Phenom II has the low and midrange.
|
Well you see it badly. First, I5 is slower or tied with PII so I5 is not high end. I7 920 is also not ultra high end as it is reserved for 975. PII handles CF better than the I7 and saying that I7 scales better than Core2/Phenom II in CF is a lie. And yes, PII + midrange card is for budget conscious gamers, but so is I7 + midrange card. PII indeed has both low and high end, but not enthusiast end options. PII 5xx low end, 7xx & 8xx midrange, 9xx high end. Generally the I7 is a better option than PII at this moment if you do anything except gaming, but the PII also has an edge in encryption, x264 encoding and multiple ATI cards (CF). Core I5 doesn't really make any sense to me. At first I thought they would be releasing something nice for a change and get back to midrange. But it is not all that cheap and will perform much worse than I7. Also, getting the crippled 8xx versions of I7 that are also overpriced is pointless.
| PsychoSaysDie wrote : I dont think i've ever seen a 550 owner on this site do more then 4Ghz. I have seen multiple people do 4.5+ with an E8500/E8600 |
Well that is because you don't know anyone that has a 550 over 4Ghz... The only reason Im stuck at 4Ghz is due to my chipset and ram... I have 3 buddies that have their 550's at 4.5Ghz/4.6Ghz and 4.2Ghz on water using DDR3 ram and 790XT's....
| Cryslayer80 wrote : Well you see it badly. First, I5 is slower or tied with PII so I5 is not high end. I7 920 is also not ultra high end as it is reserved for 975. PII handles CF better than the I7 and saying that I7 scales better than Core2/Phenom II in CF is a lie. And yes, PII + midrange card is for budget conscious gamers, but so is I7 + midrange card. PII indeed has both low and high end, but not enthusiast end options. PII 5xx low end, 7xx & 8xx midrange, 9xx high end. Generally the I7 is a better option than PII at this moment if you do anything except gaming, but the PII also has an edge in encryption, x264 encoding and multiple ATI cards (CF). Core I5 doesn't really make any sense to me. At first I thought they would be releasing something nice for a change and get back to midrange. But it is not all that cheap and will perform much worse than I7. Also, getting the crippled 8xx versions of I7 that are also overpriced is pointless. |
I5 slower then P2? What benchmarks were you looking at? From what i've seen the I5 750 beat down the 965 in almost every test. Anyone going with a 965 over a 750 now is just a fanboi and should be banned from this site.
There are 486 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

