Hello, I have read some things about how i5 performs up against i7, but I am still not sure.
I don't really plan on building a PC until SATA III comes out, because I have been spoiled by SSDs, and I don't want a saturatable SATA II bus on motherboard with SATA III so close to come out.
I use Fruity Loops Studio, pretty much am considered a Power-ABUser, and I like to keep my programs open, so I don't have to open them again or wait on them opening. Yes, this isn't entirely possible at all with an AMD Athlon 64 3000+ 1.8Ghz with 1GB of RAM. It really sucks.
I originally planned on i7 920, Asus P6T, Noctua heatsink, PC Power and Cooling 750W PSU, 2x OCZ Vertex 120GB in RAID 0, 4x 1TB harddrives, Asus Essence STX, 6-12GB of DDR3 Triple Channel RAM, 1x 4870x2 since I am not much of a gamer, but enjoy it from time to time, Sennheiser 650s, Windows 7 Professinal. (It's that good)
However, since I'm already going all out, since I wanted this bad boy to last me 5+ years (I'm not a gamer, I'm sure it can), I figured I might as well go with water cooling. Also, this means that a lot of what I picked out is generalized and will be considered upon purchase, due to fluctuating prices, for instance, RAM.
Since I'm terrible about learning new things, I've stuck to using Fruity Loops Studio and third party VSTi plugins for better quality. This uses a LOT OF FPU resources. So no, a Q6600 at 4Ghz isn't enough for me, because it still takes quite some time to render a 17 plugin, 4 minute song, and I still endure skipping due to not being able to buffer as much in one time. I have heard the i7 is 80% better than the Q6600 in FPU performance. And I was fine with it not doing so well in the gaming department, I don't really game too much.
I use Photoshop among other things. About the least intensive task I do is IRC. I also plan on using 1-2 Virtual Boxes on a Linux distro of my choice and XP if necessary. So that will eat some resources in itself. I really hate dual booting. I like my uptime.
And again, I'm waiting for SATA III to come out, so I just want to see how i5s versus i7s are doing now. Particularly the i5 750 versus i7 920. The i7 920 is going for $200 at Microcenter currently, for until I get my setup, I don't know.
I'd like to see clock for clock speed, since I obviously plan to overclock. On the overclocking world record website (ripping.org), i7 920s on an Asus or Gigabyte x58 are able to overclock to 4Ghz on Air. I'm seeing the i5 750s overclocking to 4.5Ghz on air, and 4.7Ghz on water (I'd imagine it could be pushed more if the water setup was better).
So, I'd like some opinions and benchmarks focused on what I plan on doing. I've already went "shopping" around for benchmarks, but perhaps you guys can give a little more push in that direction. Searching the correct terms is not my best functionality.
Edit: I forgot to mention specifically why I plan on getting the newest technology for a computer to last me 5+ years. I have been burned by using Socket 939 AMD. Just as I got a computer, it suddenly wasn't upgradeable within a year. Socket 478 is still very upgradeable in comparison. Having very upgradeable SATA III, DDR3, and newer CPU and motherboards make this easier on me just in case I need something more. AMD has burned me so bad, that even though it might be cheaper to go with a Phenom II, I refuse, because they seem to change sockets every year. On top of this, I've already seen the performance difference in the department of what I do. i7 pricing is something I can tolerate for it's awesome performance.
Thanks much,
Kelpie
I don't really plan on building a PC until SATA III comes out, because I have been spoiled by SSDs, and I don't want a saturatable SATA II bus on motherboard with SATA III so close to come out.
I use Fruity Loops Studio, pretty much am considered a Power-ABUser, and I like to keep my programs open, so I don't have to open them again or wait on them opening. Yes, this isn't entirely possible at all with an AMD Athlon 64 3000+ 1.8Ghz with 1GB of RAM. It really sucks.
I originally planned on i7 920, Asus P6T, Noctua heatsink, PC Power and Cooling 750W PSU, 2x OCZ Vertex 120GB in RAID 0, 4x 1TB harddrives, Asus Essence STX, 6-12GB of DDR3 Triple Channel RAM, 1x 4870x2 since I am not much of a gamer, but enjoy it from time to time, Sennheiser 650s, Windows 7 Professinal. (It's that good)
However, since I'm already going all out, since I wanted this bad boy to last me 5+ years (I'm not a gamer, I'm sure it can), I figured I might as well go with water cooling. Also, this means that a lot of what I picked out is generalized and will be considered upon purchase, due to fluctuating prices, for instance, RAM.
Since I'm terrible about learning new things, I've stuck to using Fruity Loops Studio and third party VSTi plugins for better quality. This uses a LOT OF FPU resources. So no, a Q6600 at 4Ghz isn't enough for me, because it still takes quite some time to render a 17 plugin, 4 minute song, and I still endure skipping due to not being able to buffer as much in one time. I have heard the i7 is 80% better than the Q6600 in FPU performance. And I was fine with it not doing so well in the gaming department, I don't really game too much.
I use Photoshop among other things. About the least intensive task I do is IRC. I also plan on using 1-2 Virtual Boxes on a Linux distro of my choice and XP if necessary. So that will eat some resources in itself. I really hate dual booting. I like my uptime.
And again, I'm waiting for SATA III to come out, so I just want to see how i5s versus i7s are doing now. Particularly the i5 750 versus i7 920. The i7 920 is going for $200 at Microcenter currently, for until I get my setup, I don't know.
I'd like to see clock for clock speed, since I obviously plan to overclock. On the overclocking world record website (ripping.org), i7 920s on an Asus or Gigabyte x58 are able to overclock to 4Ghz on Air. I'm seeing the i5 750s overclocking to 4.5Ghz on air, and 4.7Ghz on water (I'd imagine it could be pushed more if the water setup was better).
So, I'd like some opinions and benchmarks focused on what I plan on doing. I've already went "shopping" around for benchmarks, but perhaps you guys can give a little more push in that direction. Searching the correct terms is not my best functionality.
Edit: I forgot to mention specifically why I plan on getting the newest technology for a computer to last me 5+ years. I have been burned by using Socket 939 AMD. Just as I got a computer, it suddenly wasn't upgradeable within a year. Socket 478 is still very upgradeable in comparison. Having very upgradeable SATA III, DDR3, and newer CPU and motherboards make this easier on me just in case I need something more. AMD has burned me so bad, that even though it might be cheaper to go with a Phenom II, I refuse, because they seem to change sockets every year. On top of this, I've already seen the performance difference in the department of what I do. i7 pricing is something I can tolerate for it's awesome performance.
Thanks much,
Kelpie