Thanks for explaining the direction and mechanism of monitor scanning.
I understand that phosphor bleeding can occur at any area of the screen, but I have noticed that all crt monitors (home, work, stores, friends houses, etc.) show a disproportionate bleeding on the right side of the screen in dark backgrounds. Is this an eerie coincidence or have I noticed a pattern that speaks of monitor design limitations?
I think this asymmetry can be explained by the asymmetrical scanning of monitors that you have explained.
Consider an illustration. Imagine a mouse pointer moving from left to right. It leaves a decaying trail that is stronger at the most recently passed part of the screen. Now, imagine it blanks out and returns the start point (for simplicity lets not consider vertical movement). Obviously, no trace in right to left direction is observed as their is no beam. Now, repeat the movement to the right again. NOw imagine cranking up the speed and repeating. It's not hard to imagine the right side of the screen showing a trace gradient of phosphor bleed at the right speed as the duration of the last decay is greater than than scan rate. Now if the blanking time is reduced, that also helps exxagerate the effect. Is this not a plausible explanation? I have a feeling it's way too oversimplified, but I'm convinced that the right side phosphor bleed is a real trend of some sort.
What else do you suggest causes the disproportionate phosphor bleed on the right? Or do you hold that my observations of right side phosphor bleed coincedental?
Quality is better than name brand, even regarding beloved AMD.