It took a while to find and disable all the power-saving features that would cause my CPU to report a lower multiplier and clock speed. I thought I got them all, but listen to this:
CPU-Z shows my multiplier at 40x, bus at 100MHz, and my clocks at 3990MHz.
ALL other software shows 3390MHz, or below. And I've tried many different programs.
PC-Wizard shows an interesting clue: While it finally reports my multiplier correctly at 40x (while also dumbly saying my multiplier is LOCKED at 33x max, FYI), it also shows that my CPU bus speed is down to 82MHz. In bios, my bus speed is set to 100MHz.
A bus speed of 82MHz with a 40x multiplier would yield 3390MHz, so I have to think PC-Wizard is being the most accurate here.
It would also mean that CPU-Z is being entirely incorrect in saying the clocks are @ 3990MHz, using a reading of the bios setting rather than a live sample to determine the current effective clock speed.
Can someone confirm if my thinking is correct here? Are people who use CPU-Z to confirm overclocking success actually getting inaccurate readings, and their CPUs are really running at stock speeds because some Intel feature is dropping down their CPU bus to compensate for the higher multiplier?
PS. I disabled C3/C6, C1E, EIST, and Turbo, and this is still happening. Am I correct in ascertaining what's happening here? If so what could be causing it?
CPU-Z shows my multiplier at 40x, bus at 100MHz, and my clocks at 3990MHz.
ALL other software shows 3390MHz, or below. And I've tried many different programs.
PC-Wizard shows an interesting clue: While it finally reports my multiplier correctly at 40x (while also dumbly saying my multiplier is LOCKED at 33x max, FYI), it also shows that my CPU bus speed is down to 82MHz. In bios, my bus speed is set to 100MHz.
A bus speed of 82MHz with a 40x multiplier would yield 3390MHz, so I have to think PC-Wizard is being the most accurate here.
It would also mean that CPU-Z is being entirely incorrect in saying the clocks are @ 3990MHz, using a reading of the bios setting rather than a live sample to determine the current effective clock speed.
Can someone confirm if my thinking is correct here? Are people who use CPU-Z to confirm overclocking success actually getting inaccurate readings, and their CPUs are really running at stock speeds because some Intel feature is dropping down their CPU bus to compensate for the higher multiplier?
PS. I disabled C3/C6, C1E, EIST, and Turbo, and this is still happening. Am I correct in ascertaining what's happening here? If so what could be causing it?