Difference between these 2 power supplies

Xzar

Distinguished
Jul 20, 2006
54
0
18,630
http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817151080&cm_re=seasonic_500w-_-17-151-080-_-Product

Power supply A: SeaSonic SS-500ET Bronze 500W ATX12V v2.31 80 PLUS BRONZE Certified Active PFC Power Supply - OEM 83 dollars

http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817151069&cm_re=seasonic_500w-_-17-151-069-_-Product

Power supply B: SeaSonic SS-500ET 500W ATX12V V2.2 / EPS12V V2.91 SLI Ready CrossFire Ready 80 PLUS Certified Active PFC Power Supply - OEM 74.50 dollars

I did a bit of research and I found that the ATX12V V2.2 specification (power supply B) requires that power connectors that plug into the motherboard be of higher quality.

I couldn't find anything about ATX12V v2.31 (power supply A)

Which of those 2 power supplies is superior?

Here are my wild guesses:

I think power supply A (83 dollars) came from an earlier batch so the price is higher. Power supply B (74.50 dollars) came from a more recent patch after Seasonic found a way to reduce manufacturing costs (not by choosing lower quality parts I hope-again just wild speculation on my part).

Any info pertaining to the difference between those 2 power supplies would be appreciated.

Once I get this power supply I'll give my Antec Neopower 430 watts (32 amps on 12v rails or 384 watts on that 12v rail) to my brother.

He's running a GTS 250 that requires 2 pci-e power connectors on a Diablo 550w power supply (20 amps on 12v). This power supply has no pci-e connectors of its own, so we have to use one pci-e = 2X 4-pin adapters. Therefore we should need 4 x 4-pin power connectors to cover both pci-e power ports of the GTS 250.

However, the Diablo 550w only has 2 free 4-pin power connectors, so 1 x 4-pin power connector on the other side of each pci-e power port :ouch:
 
Solution

The first costs more because it is a newer, more efficient version.

theAnimal

Distinguished
Jan 21, 2009
2,370
0
19,810

The first costs more because it is a newer, more efficient version.
 
Solution