I have both of these CPU's and need a little help. I have the E8400 in a new build I built back in Feb 09 and now have this Q6600 that I just got with a mobo I won on Ebay.
My Question is this CPu better than the e8400 I have installed. Thanks, Bt
I have both of these CPU's and need a little help. I have the E8400 in a new build I built back in Feb 09 and now have this Q6600 that I just got with a mobo I won on Ebay.
My Question is this CPu better than the e8400 I have installed. Thanks, Bt
That's a synthetic benchmark that takes advantage of all cores, it cannot be compared with real gaming performance where the E8400 will win most of the time (still it's better to get a Q6600 and overclock it.)
Dual core tends to work betetr for games due to higher clock frequency, that said there is nothing to stop you overclocking the Q6600 to make up the difference.
Multi tasking is always going to benefit from more cores
That's a synthetic benchmark that takes advantage of all cores, it cannot be compared with real gaming performance where the E8400 will win most of the time (still it's better to get a Q6600 and overclock it.)
Yes I know, but still I like that they rate the CPUs overall, instead of using individual benchmarks in which one CPU can be better than the other.
This chart seems like a good way to see how good is a CPU all around.
Thanks guys, I have two computers in my office that I use for everything plus gaming . The e8400 is on a gigabyte ep45 ud3p with a single hd4870 gigabyte video card and 8gb ddr2. I got the Q6600 on a fxf 790i sli ultra board I won on Ebay to upgrade the other machine.
Well for gaming, the E8400. It will overclock to a minimum of 4ghz which would absolutely crush the Q6600 at 3ghz in any game that only utilizes 2 cores, which is most games.