GA-790XTA-UD4 or GA-770TA-UD3

hawtfrank

Distinguished
Mar 5, 2008
19
0
18,510
I was wondering if anybody has the new GA-790XTA-UD4 or GA-770TA-UD3 as I am looking to buy one of them. They are new so no reviews have been posted that I can find. Just looking for feed back on them.
 
Solution
I would go with the 790XTA-UD4 it has both USB 3.0 and the new SATA 3 (6GB/s) on it. Now if you want also to have 2 graphics cards and both running at X16 in the PCI-e slots then go for the even newer 790FXTA-UD5 has everything the 790XTA-UD4 but also has two PCI=e slots that run at x16. It actually has 3 x16 slots but if you populate all 3 they run at x16 x8 x8 where if you run 2 cards its x16 x16. On the UD4 they run at x16 x8 and so on. But they UD5 board also costs like $40 more then the UD4.

Epox

Distinguished
Mar 7, 2010
7
0
18,520
Same question here. I know this topic is old but maybe the OP can come back and tell us what choice he finally made. I guess really at this point my only concern is: SB710 vs SB750...

I can save $30+ going with SB750 and still get the features I need/want, but I read on Tom's Hardware the SB750 is "reputed" to have better USB & SATA performance... ?

I don't want to get the SB710 and then find out it takes 2 minutes to transfer a 100 MB file via USB
 

Gryfalcon

Distinguished
Sep 10, 2004
20
0
18,520
I would go with the 790XTA-UD4 it has both USB 3.0 and the new SATA 3 (6GB/s) on it. Now if you want also to have 2 graphics cards and both running at X16 in the PCI-e slots then go for the even newer 790FXTA-UD5 has everything the 790XTA-UD4 but also has two PCI=e slots that run at x16. It actually has 3 x16 slots but if you populate all 3 they run at x16 x8 x8 where if you run 2 cards its x16 x16. On the UD4 they run at x16 x8 and so on. But they UD5 board also costs like $40 more then the UD4.
 
Solution

bilbat

Splendid
Aaaahhh - I shouldn't tease :non: Every hero needs a foil, every market needs competitors...and someone's got to keep Intel at least 'semi-honest'! My on-going headache, and major complaint about AMD has never been their hardware, it's always been their documentation - or, more succinctly, the total lack thereof. In the past couple months, with a sucking sound hear 'round the world, someone there has withdrawn their head from their nether regions, and published, or at least, made available what had been 'hidden', more documentation than they had previously released in a couple decades! [:bilbat:5] Now, I gotta dig through it :cry: