One of my friends have just bought an i7 and he asked me why intel came out with i5. I couldn't answer him because I don't know anything about the i5. What's it's selling point? It's a bit cheaper, but not that much.
The i5 is cheaper and uses less power, so a better question would be: "what does the i7 have that the i5 doesn't?"
Of course HT and triple channel memory and better support for multiple GPU solutions have their uses but only for a small minority of users (I bought my i7 setup before the i5 was released, otherwise I'd probably have gone for the i5.)
Message edited by Gulli on 09-24-2009 at 12:34:08 AM
------------------------------CPU: Intel Core i7 920 @3.2Ghz, MOBO: Asus P6T SE, RAM: 3x 2gb OCZ Platinum OCZ3P1600LV6GK, GPU: Sapphire HD 5870, PSU: Corsair HX520W, HDD: Seagate ST31000528AS 1Tb 32mb, COOLER: Scythe Mugen (S775 version), CASE: Coolermaster CM690
Reply to Gulli
One of my friends have just bought an i7 and he asked me why intel came out with i5. I couldn't answer him because I don't know anything about the i5. What's it's selling point? It's a bit cheaper, but not that much.
I take it you and your friend have never heard of google, your both incapable of typing intel.com, and neither of you know how to read?
Because if you read a i5 review right here on Tom's Hardware Guide, you would have been able to answer that question yourself.
I often wonder how some people make it through life......
One of my friends have just bought an i7 and he asked me why intel came out with i5. I couldn't answer him because I don't know anything about the i5. What's it's selling point? It's a bit cheaper, but not that much.
Core i5 is supposed to be the mainstream CPU, while the Core i7 is supposed to be the high end / enthusiast CPU. Both Core i7 and Core i5 shares the same cores, but Core i7 does not have PCI-E generator built in. So therefore because there are less components on die, Core i7 is able to overclock higher, with better support for multi-GPU configuration.
So in a nutshell, if you are planning to go for a multi-GPU solution, Core i7 is a much better choice for you. If not, Core i5 would suit you better.
------------------------------Intel will not take the top spot, or probably the top 3 spot back for the forseeable future. Not even with 32nm and more cores will intel be able to beat Jaguar. - JennyH the AMDiot, Nov 2009
Reply to yomamafor1
One of my friends have just bought an i7 and he asked me why intel came out with i5. I couldn't answer him because I don't know anything about the i5. What's it's selling point? It's a bit cheaper, but not that much.
He will feel less ripped off once he changes over to AMD in a years time.
He will feel less ripped off once he changes over to AMD in a years time.
Yeah because in 2010 God will suddenly let a superior CPU descend from the heavens unto the desk of AMD's CEO, since AMD getting on top of Intel in the near future would require nothing less than a miracle.
Sad really, this means Intel can keep its prices high and will invest less in R&D.
Message edited by Gulli on 09-24-2009 at 01:47:10 AM
------------------------------CPU: Intel Core i7 920 @3.2Ghz, MOBO: Asus P6T SE, RAM: 3x 2gb OCZ Platinum OCZ3P1600LV6GK, GPU: Sapphire HD 5870, PSU: Corsair HX520W, HDD: Seagate ST31000528AS 1Tb 32mb, COOLER: Scythe Mugen (S775 version), CASE: Coolermaster CM690
Reply to Gulli
Jennyh, currently im with AMD (955 BE) but in a year that could change or couldn't. If Bulldozer is released, i will stick around, and if the 975 has a Cache increase and 125 tdp (same with Thuban six core) i will stay. Otherwise Intel is getting to enticing.
He will feel less ripped off once he changes over to AMD in a years time.
And let me guess, he'll feel that his future health is secured because of AMD?
------------------------------Intel will not take the top spot, or probably the top 3 spot back for the forseeable future. Not even with 32nm and more cores will intel be able to beat Jaguar. - JennyH the AMDiot, Nov 2009
Reply to yomamafor1