Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Celeron D 2.8ghz VS. Pentium 4 3.0Ghz

Last response: in CPUs
Share
September 24, 2009 4:18:58 PM

Wondering if the P4's Hyper Threading, 800mhz FSB ( its 533 on my Cel-D) 2mb L2 cache ( 256kbit on the celeron) So will the major increase in cache size and FSB boost and HT mean a Noticable increase in a computer used for media applications. Anyone have any benchies?
September 24, 2009 7:55:42 PM

p4 will beat the celeron d.


a b à CPUs
September 24, 2009 8:08:06 PM

Well if the media is video, then a higher memory bandwidth is certainly going to provide a noticeable performance increase!

Also 256KB (not Kbit btw) isn't going to hold up against 2048Kb.

Both those reasons are why the Celeron was a cheaper processor, and if I remember correctly, they were just P4's with bad cache. I've got the same P4 chip at home just sitting there, I wont get enough money to make selling it worthwhile, so I imagine your decision (with regards to cost) should be very simple.

I don't have any benchmarks for the Cel 2.8 but I can say the Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16Ghz is approximately 4x as quick as the P4 3.0 CPU (I used the same hardware and swapped chips). So if you're wondering about getting something a little newer without going crazy, the Core2 chips are a massive step up (and the new motherboards backward support the older P4 chips too, which makes upgrading to Core2 a wee bit easier).
Related resources
a c 172 à CPUs
September 24, 2009 10:16:49 PM

If you plan on perhaps upgrading a motherboard and CPU (even if not at the same time), why not just go to the i5?
a b à CPUs
September 25, 2009 12:16:19 AM

jsc said:
If you plan on perhaps upgrading a motherboard and CPU (even if not at the same time), why not just go to the i5?




Because a decent socket 775 dual core can be had for $150 mobo/cpu/4G ram.
a b à CPUs
September 25, 2009 12:26:26 AM

and its EOL socket so there is nothing new and finding an upgrade later will node be easy, this coming from a person with a S939 server
a b à CPUs
September 25, 2009 12:36:08 AM

Theres plenty of life left in 775, when they quit producing it it will be eol, until then its still a viable option on a budget. They just released a couple new 775 CPUS.

Bedides an i5 platform is not real future proof either, only 8x8 or 16x1, no upgrade to i9, and no triple channel. Passsssss. x58 platform is the only way to future proof at this time.
a b à CPUs
September 25, 2009 1:00:44 AM

Someone who is asking about upgrading to a P4 chip, is not going to have the money for an i5/i7 setup. That's why I suggested the 775 socket chips. When you're on a tight budget, futureproofing goes out the window.

If he bought new motherboard and RAM (and video card if needed), he could make use of it before getting the new CPU as both of the chips mentioned will work in P35 or P45 boards.

(On a side note I don't think there is a huge future in 775, its not EOL but I'd say it's end-of-development, it bores Intel now. My next upgrade will be X58 for the reasons in the post above, the 1156 socket will drop off I reckon).
!