I just finished assembling a brand new system. Full of expectation, I ran 3DMark06 only to be seriously disappointed:
My specs are these:
ASRock P43DE motherboard
Core 2 Duo E8400 (FSB 1333Mhz)
2x 2GB DDR2 ram (1066 Mhz CL-6-6-6-18)
GeForce GTX 260
And my best results are:
12509 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 5761
SM 3.0 Score 6342
CPU Score 2520
Similar systems reach 17000 with ease. In fact, a system that I built half a year ago (had all inferior components) scored higher than that.
There must be something wrong with this. Especially the CPU score, which should be at least 50% higher. What could be the causes of this, and where should I investigate?
Unfortunately I have no replacement hardware to experiment with. The newest system I have here is 7 years old.. and I also haven't been too involved with hardware either, since then.
I'm kinda worried that some component might have been damaged..
Yes, my "trial" version of 3DMark doesn't allow any settings to be changed. But with exactly this version, I scored much more with an older system.
Quote :
cpu speed (might change do to speedstep while idling)
Speedstepping is disabled. There is an option in bios, but it's greyed out. I can't even enable it.
Quote :
also what drivers have you installed that didnt come with windows.
I installed all drivers that came with my motherboard: Realtek Ethernet, VIA Audio, Intel Chipset Device Software (those were the ones that still had problems after a clean XP installation)
Also, of course, nVidia Display Drivers. All of those are sufficiently up to date as well.
Here a screenshot, that might be easier to read:
And here's the report:
CPU-Z TXT Report
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Processors Information
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Processor 1 ID = 0
Number of cores 2 (max 2)
Number of threads 2 (max 2)
Name Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Codename Wolfdale
Specification Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
Package (platform ID) Socket 775 LGA (0x0)
CPUID 6.7.A
Extended CPUID 6.17
Core Stepping E0
Technology 45 nm
Core Speed 2625.2 MHz
Multiplier x FSB 8.0 x 328.1 MHz
Rated Bus speed 1312.6 MHz
Stock frequency 3000 MHz
Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, EM64T
L1 Data cache 2 x 32 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
L1 Instruction cache 2 x 32 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
L2 cache 6144 KBytes, 24-way set associative, 64-byte line size
FID/VID Control yes
FID range 6.0x - 9.0x
Max VID 1.225 V
Description Host Bridge
Description USB Controller (UHCI)
Description USB Controller (UHCI)
Description USB Controller (UHCI)
Description Multimedia device
Description PCI to PCI Bridge
Description PCI to PCI Bridge
Description PCI to PCI Bridge
Description USB Controller (UHCI)
Description USB Controller (UHCI)
Description USB Controller (UHCI)
Description USB 2.0 Controller (EHCI)
Description PCI to PCI Bridge
Description PCI to ISA Bridg
Description SMBus Controller
Description IDE Controller
Description Ethernet Controller
Description IDE Controller
Description VGA Controller
No, that's about right IIRC as I don't have my 8400 rig fired up at the moment I can't give you a direct comparison now but I'll try and post one later.
I just tried gaming for about an hour, and I think insufficient cooling might be one factor of the bad performance.
The GTX260 is at 94°C and cooled down to 71° after a minute. (Too hot?)
The CPU never even went above 62°, cools down very slow, and is about 54° in idle. Its heatsink isn't really hot at all, which is kinda odd, right?
Those CPU temperatures seem high. My stock clocked and cooled E6600 idles about 32c and only gets over 45c under Prime 95 or TAT full load tests.
Check that the pushpins have gone fully home, they are well known for being difficult to 'click' and lock correctly, resulting in poor CPU/heatsink contact.
The card could be cooler as well, download and use Rivatuner to change the fan speed and those temperatures should drop nicely.
Check that the pushpins have gone fully home, they are well known for being difficult to 'click' and lock correctly, resulting in poor CPU/heatsink contact.
I wasn't really sure if I attached the cooler correctly, and have removed and reattached it a few times. Could that have resulted in the heat paste getting too thick?
(I'm really worried about damaging the CPU when messing around with the cooler too much. Is it true that applying any directional pressure will break the CPU to pieces?)
As far as I can tell, all four pushpins locked in. However, it takes more than 10 minutes for the core temperature to drop from ~60 to ~50.
Would it be worth the effort to get some new heat paste and try with that?
I'm also thinking about replacing the stock cooler with something different. But this one is already loud as hell. Do those third party coolers perform better while being more silent?