Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

How many cores are actually in a 'core i5'

Last response: in CPUs
Share

So either I missed something somewhere or most likely just dont comprehend it. But with the new intel core i5 or some i7's with the integrated graphics on the same die, how many cores are there actually? since one core is the graphics..

So does this mean a quad core is actually 3 core cpu 1 core gpu.. or is it still 4 core cpu, 1 gpu making it a 5 core?
thnx

More about : cores core

None of the currently available Intel CPUs have graphics on die. That is planned, but currently unavailable. From what I can tell, i5 CPUs are those which have 4 threads. This means they are either 4 cores without SMT (1 thread per core) or dual cores with SMT (2 threads per core). Currently, the i5-750 is the only i5 available, and it is a quad core without SMT.
Related ressources

jimmysmitty said:
I also think there will be a i5 with 4 CPU cores and 8 threads. Or will they retain that for Cire i7 LGA1366.

I think the naming system is based on number of threads. i3 = 2 threads, i5 = 4 threads (whether via a dual with SMT or a quad without), i7=8 threads, and possibly i9=12 threads.

cjl said:
I think the naming system is based on number of threads. i3 = 2 threads, i5 = 4 threads (whether via a dual with SMT or a quad without), i7=8 threads, and possibly i9=12 threads.


SO then Core i13 would mean 16 threads? Or Core i14..... Man this will hurt my head....

WR2 said:
After that you'll have SandyBridge which will have the GPU on the same silicon as the CPUs:
http://hb.beareyes.com.cn/2/lib/200908/15/022/1.jpg


Interesting. So I think its going to have the GPU connected to the L3 as well/. Wounder what that will do for it.

jimmysmitty said:
SO then Core i13 would mean 16 threads? Or Core i14..... Man this will hurt my head....

Who knows. Maybe they'll abandon that naming system before that would happen...

cjl said:
I think the naming system is based on number of threads. i3 = 2 threads, i5 = 4 threads (whether via a dual with SMT or a quad without), i7=8 threads, and possibly i9=12 threads.


That wouldn't work, I3 is a dual core with HT to enable 4 threads.

loneninja said:
That wouldn't work, I3 is a dual core with HT to enable 4 threads.

I'm pretty sure that i3 is a dual without SM, with only 2 threads, and that duals with SMT enabled would be branded as i5.

i3, i5 and i7 are replacing Celeron, Pentium and C2D/C2Q. Basically i3 are entry level CPUs, i5 are mainstream parts and i7 performance/enthusiast. It's more about 'branding' than how many cores or threads.

archibael said:
The Pentium brand stays, below i3.


Surprised they don't call it an aye-aye, as in "Aye-aye, 3 bags full Sir!" :D .

OTOH, AMD already beat Intel to the last level - they have the 'eye-finity' :) .

For our dear friend jennyh, I'd suggest a specially branded CPU - the X-eye-X (a Crossfired i-core, or cross-eye for short :D )

fazers_on_stun said:
Surprised they don't call it an aye-aye, as in "Aye-aye, 3 bags full Sir!" :D .

OTOH, AMD already beat Intel to the last level - they have the 'eye-finity' :) .

For our dear friend jennyh, I'd suggest a specially branded CPU - the X-eye-X (a Crossfired i-core, or cross-eye for short :D )


:lol: 

Quote:
jimmysmitty

cjl wrote :

I think the naming system is based on number of threads. i3 = 2 threads, i5 = 4 threads (whether via a dual with SMT or a quad without), i7=8 threads, and possibly i9=12 threads.



SO then Core i13 would mean 16 threads? Or Core i14..... Man this will hurt my head....


Well for the Core I(x) it would be odd numbers. i5 i7 i9 i11 i13 ect.

cores/ht

i5: 4/4
i7: 4/8
i9: 6/12
(if they continue this trend then it should go like this)
i11:8/16
i13 10/20
Ect.

cant say it hurts may head.
Ask the community
!