Athlon LE1660 versus Intel E5300

robby

Distinguished
Jul 14, 2009
25
0
18,530
How to compare?

Athlon says Level2 cache is 512MB while Intel says it is 2MB. Sounds like Athlon wins here.

Athlon is up to 2000 MT/s bus while Intel says 800 MHz. How do I compare that?

Intel is Dual Core; Athlon does not say.

Is Dual Core the same as or better/worse than Core2Duo?
 

Bonzo

Distinguished
Jul 18, 2006
8
0
18,510
The Athlon is a single core processor, and it has 512Kb cache, not Mb! It is also based on the older Athlon 64 architecture. Basically, The Intel E5300 will beat it easily and then some.
 

robby

Distinguished
Jul 14, 2009
25
0
18,530
Thanks.

Interesting that on the HP site when they describe the Athlon they uniformly say 512Mb not Kb.

Anyway -- just for the record -- (1) is there an easy way to compare the 2000 MT/s bus rating to the while 800 MHz rating? and (2) is Dual Core the same as or better/worse than Core2Duo?
 

ddkshah

Distinguished
Oct 2, 2009
86
0
18,630
worse Core2Duo will beat and Pentium Processor. The E5200 is a pentium processor which has older technology then Core2Duo.
 

blackwidow_rsa

Distinguished
Aug 16, 2007
846
0
18,990
core2 cpus have more cache and faster FSB than pentium dual-cores, but has the same Core architecture. The core2 will be faster with apps that benefit from the larger cache, like wise with the FSB.
 

daship

Distinguished



The 2 are exactly the same except different stock FSB and cache. Te FSB of the pentiums can easily match that of a core 2 duo.

I have a new Intel celeron e3200 overclocked to 3.6 with 1mb cache and it easily out benches a stock e8600 costing lots more.
 

reconviperone1

Distinguished
Nov 23, 2006
1,048
0
19,280

ROTFLMAO!