Hardware upgrades have left me with a bunch of 1TB drives. I was thinking about bonding groups of 3 together using old hardware and mixing the hardware raids into a larger software raid with some new 3TB drives....
I have most of the "junk" laying around and it would cost me approx $150US in misc hardware to put together 3 - 3TB raids (and as 2TB Drives become available maybe I'll move to 6TB Base units).
Then I then wanted to raid them together with some 3 TB drives in a larger software raid. Processor load in the box is not an issue. Up-time/Data safety is not a huge issue.
Don't get me wrong I want reasonable stability, but it is backups of backups aggregated in one place. That's one reason I want such large filesystems.
Any comments. Would the hardware raid and single drives be too unbalanced as to cause issues with a software raid? Would the same issue might arise using a group of say 3(7200 RPM Drives) with 2(5400 RPM Drives) of the same capacity in a RAID also?
I have most of the "junk" laying around and it would cost me approx $150US in misc hardware to put together 3 - 3TB raids (and as 2TB Drives become available maybe I'll move to 6TB Base units).
Then I then wanted to raid them together with some 3 TB drives in a larger software raid. Processor load in the box is not an issue. Up-time/Data safety is not a huge issue.
Don't get me wrong I want reasonable stability, but it is backups of backups aggregated in one place. That's one reason I want such large filesystems.
Any comments. Would the hardware raid and single drives be too unbalanced as to cause issues with a software raid? Would the same issue might arise using a group of say 3(7200 RPM Drives) with 2(5400 RPM Drives) of the same capacity in a RAID also?