Just look. Theres three of them, Charlie,Theo and FUaD. Theyre essentually competing for any inside info that some of us crave, and more would, if it werent for things like this.
Read the story, Theo purportedly reproduced a fallacy by plagerism. If in fact hed actually done his own work, hed have known what was what, and wouldnt have repeated the gals mistake made at the Inq, and everyone does this, here, at the Inq and at the Wall Street Journal, retractions happen, but this smacks of FUD, real FUD