Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Overclocked Nvidia GTX 295 vs Overclocked Radeon 4890 (in Crossfire)

Overclocked Nvidia GTX 295 vs Overclocked Radeon 4890 (in Crossfire)

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Overclocked Nvidia GTX 295 vs Overclocked Radeon 4890 (in Crossfire)

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 


Stats :

Overclocked Nvidia 295 GTX

Core : 684MHz (from 576Mhz )
Memory: 2238Mhz (from 2000Mhz)
Shader: 1380Mhz (from 1242Mhz)
1792Mb

Overclocked Radeon 4890 (Two cards in Crsoffire mode)

2 x Powercolor PCS++

Core : 1010Mhz (from 850Mhz)
Memory : 1100Mhz
2 x 1024Mb

What do you guys think?


Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

^ The O/C 4890 would beat the GTX 295...
Though I dont have benchmarks to support the claim, but we all know that a GTX 275 SLI beats the GTX 295...and HD 4890 crossfire has similar performance of the GTX SLI...And a O/C HD 4890 would perform very similar to GTX 285 stock...
So HD 4890 might beat the GTX 295 O/C...
But sure the power consumption of the HD 4890 O/C would be pretty high compared to the GTX 295 O/C and would give out more heat...

But I maybe wrong though about the performance...Others do post your views...

Reply to gkay09

Using analogy I believe the CF'ed 4890's would take a 295. Of course it would depend on the game, we all know some games are heavily slanted one way or the other.

------------------------------ i7 920 @ 3.33gHz, X58-UD4P, 6GB OCZ Gold 1333mHz, 4890 @ 925mHz, WD Caviar Black 500 and 640 GB, PCP&C 750W, and a CM V8 all stuffed into a CM 690
http://www.speedtest.net/result/592977006.png
Reply to astrodudepsu

Depends on the game, CPU, and settings, but I'd say in general the two oc 4890s for the win.

------------------------------ Playing X-Men Origins: Wolverine Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @3.24 Brisbane | GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-DS4 | 4GB Mushkin DDR2 1066 | Plextor 760A| 2x 3850 512M CF| WD 1TB Black| Fortron Blue Storm II 500W | APEVIA X-Dreamer Black | Win XP Pro & Vista Buisness 32bit
Reply to megamanx00

Actually, an overclocked Radeon 4890 to 1ghz is only about 1-4% behind an overclocked GTX 285 as the 4890 has a higher peak overclocking ability.

In the GREEN corner Nvidia GTX 285 (OC to 720Mhz from 648Mhz)

In the RED corner Ati Radeon 4890 (OC to 1.0Ghz from 850Mhz)


Call of Duty World at War

Max everything 4 x MSAA

1680 x 1050 resil

GREEN : 45.0 avg fps
RED : 40.9 avg fps


Crysis Warhead

1280 x 1024
Enthusiast everything
4xMSAA

GREEN: 28.7 avg fps
RED: 26.6 avg fps

1920 x 1080
Enthusiast everything
4xMSAA

GREEN: 15.9 fps
RED: 15.0 fps


Fallout 3

(ATI WINS at this resolution)

1280 x 1024 Resil
Max everything
8 x MSAA

GREEN: 69.2 avg fps
RED: 70.1 avg fps

1680x1050
Max everything
8 x MSAA

GREEN: 58.5 avg fps
RED: 58.1 avg fps



This is comparing Nvidias single most powerful card (non duel card based) VS ATIs most powerful card - both overclocked to near their maximum capability (the ATI 4890 is sold factory overclocked to 1010Mhz )

The 4890 is a BEAST for its price in comparison to the GTX 285

Source: http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid [...] s/Reviews/




Reply to polyzp

A GTX 295~ 2x GTX 260 216 Core in sli

 

HD 4890 1GHZ>A gtx 275~ a HD 4890> GTX 260 216 Core

 

So Go for 2x HD 4890 in CF.


Message edited by teja92 on 08-04-2009 at 10:51:48 AM
Reply to teja92

^ The current GTX295 is actually 2 GTX 275 chips not GTX 260 Core 216...
Check the specs...you would notice 240 Cores...

Reply to gkay09
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Overclocked Nvidia GTX 295 vs Overclocked Radeon 4890 (in Crossfire)
Go to:

There are 1024 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them