So if I am reading this correctly, its is showing that AMD did not have or retain the proper paperwork for the Antitrust case when they should have started, thus it would throw this case out but possibly open a new one.
Well one that starts from 2005 anyways. Problem is that thats about when most OEMs started to really push AMD CPUs since Prescott turned into a meh CPU. That could mean AMD wouldn't have anything.
unfortunately the law is the law. Japan is much like the uS in that way too. If you do not have all the proper evidence or paperwork required then you pretty much get screwed. If there is even the slightest doubt that Manson did not kill anyone then he is not guilty.
jennyh :
Or my version - intel are well-known cheats, AMD are the champions of everything good and true. etc. Feel free to run that one past your wife btw.
Meh Wiki is meh. Its great for fast facts but is not always 100%.
Also, I hope this quote is not true because to AMD people who think like that have wallets ripe for the pickin to fill their own.
Corporations big or small still means money making.
Now I find it kinda funny how the posters to that article bash Intel for this yet instead of reading it or understanding the meaning they consider it sneaky or underhanded. I personally think AMD blaming all their financial problems on Intel is pretty underhanded since they also took the proper steps to insure they would be losing money too.....