Ok, so, to be completely honest, I am much better with software than hardware when it comes to computers. Granted, I know a pretty good amount about the later, and am constantly learning, one thing in particular has really been bugging me, given what I have read as far as people choosing I5 over a AMD 955 or 65. I honestly have not heard of any reason other than the "I5 is better", but it seems in every benchmark, they only include "stock settings", however, doesn't the I5 overclock automatically when need be? If so, doesn't that give the benchmarks a bit of a bias, as anyone who would use either processor at max would know how to overclock, so shouldn't the benchmarks include an overclocked AMD as well? And if so, does the AMD gain a significant performance increase?
Again, I could be way off, it just seemed odd to me, and i would really like your opinions, as I want to do a well build and powerful AMD build, but can't get a good response as to if I should go that route, or instead take the I5 that some say is much better, while others don't. Any advice or input?
Again, I could be way off, it just seemed odd to me, and i would really like your opinions, as I want to do a well build and powerful AMD build, but can't get a good response as to if I should go that route, or instead take the I5 that some say is much better, while others don't. Any advice or input?