Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > AMD for graphics, nVIDIA for physix?

AMD for graphics, nVIDIA for physix?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - AMD for graphics, nVIDIA for physix?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Can anybody tell if an ATI 4890 can get along well with a GF 8800GT for physix? Will there be driver interference?
Did anyone try this?
Can this combination run on intel mobos? Or nForce mobos?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Seriously now.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger

What? I'm serious..Is it possible?

------------------------------ Antec 902--ASUS P5KSE, thermaltake extreme spirit II--FSP 500w--E6750 @ 3.6 Ghz, Zalman CNPS 9500--OCZ reaper HPC 4 Gb @ 1081 mhz--GF 8800GT @ 700,1700,920, Zalman alcu700--WD caviar Green 1TB--Maxtor 160 Gb--BenQ T2200 HD--Benq FP72E--7RC ultimate 64bit
Reply to avatar_raq

What? Are you saying it's not possible? Why?
I'm serious BTW..

------------------------------ Antec 902--ASUS P5KSE, thermaltake extreme spirit II--FSP 500w--E6750 @ 3.6 Ghz, Zalman CNPS 9500--OCZ reaper HPC 4 Gb @ 1081 mhz--GF 8800GT @ 700,1700,920, Zalman alcu700--WD caviar Green 1TB--Maxtor 160 Gb--BenQ T2200 HD--Benq FP72E--7RC ultimate 64bit
Reply to avatar_raq

Well, the 400 thousand posts about this over the last couple of days about how nvidia removed the possibility of doing this in thier new drivers might give it away...

------------------------------ CPU: Q9550 at 3.6ghz (FSB 425mhz) | MB: P5E3 Premium | Ram: 4*2Gb Corsair DDR3 @1417mhz | GPU: 2 HD4890 1Gb (925core/1025mem) CF | PSU: OCZ ELiteXtreme 800W | Sound: Creative Titanium Fatal1ty Pro | 2*120gb OCZ Vertex SSD Raid0 and 2 500gb Raid0 HDDS
Reply to daedalus685

To be honest i doubt physx will ever take off on a big scale, 'Havok' have a good physx engine that is used only on the CPU so their is no need for the GPU.

And using physX takes up a whole grpahx card so halves ur framerate.

------------------------------ M2n32 SLi Delux | AMD pheonom 9850 @2.9GHz@1.3125v | 4x1gb OCZ SLi Ram @828MHz 4-4-4-12 Ganged | 2x8800 GTS 640mb@ 648\992 | 1x Maxtor 16mb 250Gb,
1x WD Caviar black 32mb 500gb | Onboard Sound | OCZGameXtreme 600W | ThermalTake Soprano
Reply to smoggy12345

In short what everyone is saying is it was possible but Nvidia shut it down quick with an update.

and while physX takes a card you can get an cheap 50-70 dollar card that will run it so that it doesn't mess with your frames.

Reply to darkvine

Are you saying it was possible in the previous drivers? What drivers? I'm ready to roll back..

------------------------------ Antec 902--ASUS P5KSE, thermaltake extreme spirit II--FSP 500w--E6750 @ 3.6 Ghz, Zalman CNPS 9500--OCZ reaper HPC 4 Gb @ 1081 mhz--GF 8800GT @ 700,1700,920, Zalman alcu700--WD caviar Green 1TB--Maxtor 160 Gb--BenQ T2200 HD--Benq FP72E--7RC ultimate 64bit
Reply to avatar_raq

smoggy12345 wrote :

And using physX takes up a whole grpahx card so halves ur framerate.



That is not at all how it works...

------------------------------ CPU: Q9550 at 3.6ghz (FSB 425mhz) | MB: P5E3 Premium | Ram: 4*2Gb Corsair DDR3 @1417mhz | GPU: 2 HD4890 1Gb (925core/1025mem) CF | PSU: OCZ ELiteXtreme 800W | Sound: Creative Titanium Fatal1ty Pro | 2*120gb OCZ Vertex SSD Raid0 and 2 500gb Raid0 HDDS
Reply to daedalus685

No idea. I am passing on information based on hear say as I never tried it myself. Not sure if it was added to past drivers as well or which drivers have them myself.

Reply to darkvine

I would buy a physics card, problem is it's not available in my country and I was planning to use my current main GPU (8800 GT) as a physics card for my next build.
One question though: will physics codes written for nvidia GPUs (in Mirror's Edge for example) run on the old Ageia physics card without a problem?

------------------------------ Antec 902--ASUS P5KSE, thermaltake extreme spirit II--FSP 500w--E6750 @ 3.6 Ghz, Zalman CNPS 9500--OCZ reaper HPC 4 Gb @ 1081 mhz--GF 8800GT @ 700,1700,920, Zalman alcu700--WD caviar Green 1TB--Maxtor 160 Gb--BenQ T2200 HD--Benq FP72E--7RC ultimate 64bit
Reply to avatar_raq

It is possible to do, but can be a little tricky. I've done it. Read this thread for all the info you'll need. http://tinyurl.com/q9b3sg

Reply to orangegator

Thanks orangegator.

------------------------------ Antec 902--ASUS P5KSE, thermaltake extreme spirit II--FSP 500w--E6750 @ 3.6 Ghz, Zalman CNPS 9500--OCZ reaper HPC 4 Gb @ 1081 mhz--GF 8800GT @ 700,1700,920, Zalman alcu700--WD caviar Green 1TB--Maxtor 160 Gb--BenQ T2200 HD--Benq FP72E--7RC ultimate 64bit
Reply to avatar_raq

daedalus685 wrote :

That is not at all how it works...



Thats what happened on the UT3 physx demo??? Used one card for physx and one for rendering????

------------------------------ M2n32 SLi Delux | AMD pheonom 9850 @2.9GHz@1.3125v | 4x1gb OCZ SLi Ram @828MHz 4-4-4-12 Ganged | 2x8800 GTS 640mb@ 648\992 | 1x Maxtor 16mb 250Gb,
1x WD Caviar black 32mb 500gb | Onboard Sound | OCZGameXtreme 600W | ThermalTake Soprano
Reply to smoggy12345

Orangegator,Did you try it with the 190.xx drivers?

------------------------------ Antec 902--ASUS P5KSE, thermaltake extreme spirit II--FSP 500w--E6750 @ 3.6 Ghz, Zalman CNPS 9500--OCZ reaper HPC 4 Gb @ 1081 mhz--GF 8800GT @ 700,1700,920, Zalman alcu700--WD caviar Green 1TB--Maxtor 160 Gb--BenQ T2200 HD--Benq FP72E--7RC ultimate 64bit
Reply to avatar_raq

^ IIRC they've disabled it since the 180 drivers, although it might be 190.

Reply to Helloworld_98

avatar_raq wrote :

Orangegator,Did you try it with the 190.xx drivers?



No, I did not. As was stated, Nvidia made it that with the newer drivers, starting with 186.xx, they disable physx if an ATI graphics card is also present.

Reply to orangegator

smoggy12345 wrote :

Thats what happened on the UT3 physx demo??? Used one card for physx and one for rendering????


You can dedicate which card to use for physX in a situation where you are not using SLI, but the card is not entirely used by it. For instance, a single GPU set up can use physX just fine, compared to the graphics work load the physics computation is rather negligable, though there will be somewhat of a performance hit on some rigs.

------------------------------ CPU: Q9550 at 3.6ghz (FSB 425mhz) | MB: P5E3 Premium | Ram: 4*2Gb Corsair DDR3 @1417mhz | GPU: 2 HD4890 1Gb (925core/1025mem) CF | PSU: OCZ ELiteXtreme 800W | Sound: Creative Titanium Fatal1ty Pro | 2*120gb OCZ Vertex SSD Raid0 and 2 500gb Raid0 HDDS
Reply to daedalus685

yeah but the hit would be 5-8 frames at worse. Unless you have some really weird factor going on.

Reply to darkvine

The performance hit affects slower GPUs for 2 reasons:
1-With physix enabled there'll be more particles in the scene, i.e more pixels to draw in the early rendering stages.
2-Physix computing costs some GPU cycles, the number of which increases if the GPU is slow.

------------------------------ Antec 902--ASUS P5KSE, thermaltake extreme spirit II--FSP 500w--E6750 @ 3.6 Ghz, Zalman CNPS 9500--OCZ reaper HPC 4 Gb @ 1081 mhz--GF 8800GT @ 700,1700,920, Zalman alcu700--WD caviar Green 1TB--Maxtor 160 Gb--BenQ T2200 HD--Benq FP72E--7RC ultimate 64bit
Reply to avatar_raq

Thanks NVIDIA, I'm so glad you can prevent me from using my dedicated PhysX card that I purchased before you owned the damn technology just because I have a 4870X2... And you actually expect this technology to go somewhere? Idiots...

Reply to trkorecky

trkorecky wrote :

Thanks NVIDIA, I'm so glad you can prevent me from using my dedicated PhysX card that I purchased before you owned the damn technology just because I have a 4870X2... And you actually expect this technology to go somewhere? Idiots...



Never actually thought about this... Surely they can't do that!!!!

------------------------------ M2n32 SLi Delux | AMD pheonom 9850 @2.9GHz@1.3125v | 4x1gb OCZ SLi Ram @828MHz 4-4-4-12 Ganged | 2x8800 GTS 640mb@ 648\992 | 1x Maxtor 16mb 250Gb,
1x WD Caviar black 32mb 500gb | Onboard Sound | OCZGameXtreme 600W | ThermalTake Soprano
Reply to smoggy12345

trkorecky wrote :

Thanks NVIDIA, I'm so glad you can prevent me from using my dedicated PhysX card that I purchased before you owned the damn technology just because I have a 4870X2... And you actually expect this technology to go somewhere? Idiots...


Have you tried the standalone driver? http://www.nvidia.com/object/physx_9.09.0428_whql.html

Reply to mousemonkey

avatar_raq wrote :

Can anybody tell if an ATI 4890 can get along well with a GF 8800GT for physix? Will there be driver interference?
Did anyone try this?
Can this combination run on intel mobos? Or nForce mobos?




Yes this can be achieved, contrary to what everyone is tellin you..... But you have a 50/50 chance of stability due to driver conflics....for the physics processor (9800), you can go to start/all programs/nvidia corp/physics properties and in there there is an option for g-force physics or ageia (enable). Make sure you have both drivers up to date and they have to be both legit from their respective websites, don't use any Beta drivers..... I have not tested this in Win 7, only in Vista and XP PRO...

------------------------------ 550 @ 4.0 Ghz 1.425v
BFG GTX 260 (216)
4GB G.Skill @ 960MHz
Thermaltake TP 850w
Reply to OvrClkr

On older drivers, itll work. New ones, no. Support has ended, and wont improve

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn

OvrClkr wrote :

Yes this can be achieved, contrary to what everyone is tellin you..... But you have a 50/50 chance of stability due to driver conflics....for the physics processor (9800), you can go to start/all programs/nvidia corp/physics properties and in there there is an option for g-force physics or ageia (enable). Make sure you have both drivers up to date and they have to be both legit from their respective websites, don't use any Beta drivers..... I have not tested this in Win 7, only in Vista and XP PRO...




Won't work if you have the newest drivers. Nvidia has it set up now that it won't even allow physX to appear in the menu if there is another card that isn't Nvidia installed.

Reply to darkvine

Well it worked for me a couple of months a ago with the Nvidia 178.24 drivers...didnt know they dropped the support.... :o

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by OvrClkr on 08-13-2009 at 03:28:59 AM
------------------------------ 550 @ 4.0 Ghz 1.425v
BFG GTX 260 (216)
4GB G.Skill @ 960MHz
Thermaltake TP 850w
Reply to OvrClkr

OvrClkr wrote :

Well it worked for me a couple of months a ago with the Nvidia 178.24 drivers...didnt know they dropped the support.... :o



They did, was all the rage in the news last few days :P

------------------------------ CPU: Q9550 at 3.6ghz (FSB 425mhz) | MB: P5E3 Premium | Ram: 4*2Gb Corsair DDR3 @1417mhz | GPU: 2 HD4890 1Gb (925core/1025mem) CF | PSU: OCZ ELiteXtreme 800W | Sound: Creative Titanium Fatal1ty Pro | 2*120gb OCZ Vertex SSD Raid0 and 2 500gb Raid0 HDDS
Reply to daedalus685

Ya know, its supposed to be open, and non proprietary, this kind of action flies in the face of that.
I can understand there maybe problems, as oc said, achieving a workable solution, but owners of ATI products I think would rather find those workarounds, and put up with those problems than have nVidia cut of support for this supposedly "open" ability

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn

I totally agree..But no problem, I keep the older versions of forceware, so I'm gonna use them, and try to have the best in the two worlds, Physix and DX 10.1 ! Thanks guys.
When I started this thread I wasn't sure this is even possible, and I was surprised everyone is talking about it and how nvidia disabled it in the new drivers..Idiots indeed. They could've increased their market share and upped the demand for their slower GPUs..

------------------------------ Antec 902--ASUS P5KSE, thermaltake extreme spirit II--FSP 500w--E6750 @ 3.6 Ghz, Zalman CNPS 9500--OCZ reaper HPC 4 Gb @ 1081 mhz--GF 8800GT @ 700,1700,920, Zalman alcu700--WD caviar Green 1TB--Maxtor 160 Gb--BenQ T2200 HD--Benq FP72E--7RC ultimate 64bit
Reply to avatar_raq
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > AMD for graphics, nVIDIA for physix?
Go to:

There are 1135 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them