As the question asks.... I'm not planning on overclocking or anything, and so i'm just using the stock heatsink. It's also a 65W processor (dual core). The paste looks to be metallic in nature, so it might not be that different from the artic silver.
Is the artic silver actually going to create cooler temps than the default? If not, i'll just leave the default on, as there's a smaller chance of under or overapplying with the base heatsink
its always better to clean it then reapply the new stuff, but no big deal
i dont think he meant should he remove the old stuff rather than just adding on the arctic silver. i think he meant is it worth the trouble to completely remove it then reapply arctic silver.
@OP, i can't give you any specific data but i would do it personally, you know, just for fun
Intel's stock cooler is barely adequate at stock settings, so I'm sure their stock compound is equally marginal. If you already have AS5, then use it, however, if you're ordering, then I recommend MX-2, since AS5 is far more popular than it is effective.
if you're using the stock heatsink then adding arctic silver won't make a huge impact on the cooling. you might have a couple of degrees difference (maybe 2-3 deg) but overall the temps will be only as good as the stock cooler can provide, which is on the high side.
Aside from factors already mentioned, if memory serves me correctly Intel says they will void your warranty if the stock HSF & interface material aren't used. I don't know how they would propose to prove non-compliance.
Aside from factors already mentioned, if memory serves me correctly Intel says they will void your warranty if the stock HSF & interface material aren't used. I don't know how they would propose to prove non-compliance.