GTX260 SLi vs DX11

GTX260 sp216 vs ATI 5x00 vs NvidiaGT300

  • Get the GTX260 SLi now!

    Votes: 13 30.2%
  • Get the ATI 5x00 when it comes out in 2-3 months!

    Votes: 26 60.5%
  • Get the GT300 when it comes out late this year/early next year!

    Votes: 4 9.3%

  • Total voters
    43
Should I get another XFX GTX260 sp216 (stock 576MHz) or should I wait for ATI's 5x00 cards or Nvidia's GT300 cards?

Games include Crysis, CSS, Fallout3, Farcry2, etc on 1280x1024, 1680x1050, and 1920x1080 resolutions (2 monitors, different resolutions for games)
 

HibyPrime

Distinguished
Nov 23, 2006
263
0
18,790
I would wait until ATi's cards come out, which will most likely force nvidia to drop prices. At that point you can decide if a second GTX260 will yield a better price/performance ratio than buying a 5870.
 
From what we know, the new cards are twice the output of the old.
You may find 1 single 5870 is faster than a 260 sli setup, most likely.
It they output 2 terabites, the 5850 and the 5870 slightly more.....
 

bluzman32

Distinguished
Jun 29, 2008
101
0
18,690
I'm in the same position right now too, except I'm thinking about getting another 4890. I'm just going to wait a month just to see what ATI is going to do, and see if there's going to be a price drop. Unless you really need the performance boost, you might want to wait.
 


The high end card that outputs 2 terra*** is probably the dual-GPU card similar to the 4870x2 though.

The GT200 series and the ATI 4x00 was an improvement over the G92s and 3x00, but it wasn't a huge improvement. I wonder when the benchmarks will come out... =/
 

HibyPrime

Distinguished
Nov 23, 2006
263
0
18,790
Teraflops people.

according to wikipedia the 5870 has double the shader units, so it may actually push 2 teraflops

edit: double the shader units of the 4890
 


Aye, but the 4770, 4850, 4870, 4890 all have 800 stream processors and they perform quite differently. Nvidia has 1/4 the stream processors and it performs the same as well. I hope they keep the DDR5 and increase the bandwidth...

It all comes down to benchmarks... =/
 

HibyPrime

Distinguished
Nov 23, 2006
263
0
18,790
"It they output 2 terabites, the 5850 and the 5870 slightly more..... "

if that doesn't mean "the 5850 outputs 2 teraflops, and the 5870 slightly more" then I have no idea what you mean.

Multi-terabyte what?
 
Yeh, I'd say it's all hype then. It's very unlikely ATI could pump out something twice as good as the previous generation.

I'd say a 30%-40% improvement max in terms of price vs performance. If it has at least a 30% improvement, I'd buy it.
 

masteryoda34

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2006
102
0
18,690


It's TeraFLOPS.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLOPS
In computing, FLOPS (or flops or flop/s) is an acronym meaning FLoating point Operations Per Second. The FLOPS is a measure of a computer's performance

Terabyte (not "bite") is a measurement of storage.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte
A byte (pronounced /ˈbaɪt/) is a basic unit of measurement of information storage in computer science.
 

HibyPrime

Distinguished
Nov 23, 2006
263
0
18,790
IIRC the 3870 was getting pretty close to 1Tflop on it's own, and the 4890 only hits somewhere around 1.3Tflops. To see them get all the way up to 2tflops would be incredible, but not unheard of (generation to generation wise I mean).
 


drool... :D :bounce:
 
Having a gray moment, thanks for the correction.
Its already out, part of the leaked info stated both cards to have 2 teraflop abilities
Looking at the rumored P scores on Vantage of 16000-18000, tou can guess a few things from there.
These cards are that powerful
 

HibyPrime

Distinguished
Nov 23, 2006
263
0
18,790
If they seriously hit 2 teraflops, and that performance shows up in games, *** is gunna hit the fan... the fan being nVidia

nVidia is already hurting bad in the sub-$200 market, if they get creamed in the $200+ market....
 

sharkforce

Distinguished
Aug 27, 2009
5
0
18,510

you're the reason why chip makers only increase performance slightly with each generation rather than pushing it to the technological limit. :fou:
 

lol, I'd rather buy something for $100-$150 that is 30%-40% better than the previous generation than buying a card that is 100% better but costs $500. :p Technological limits tend to be very expensive...
 

lorik

Distinguished
Aug 16, 2009
114
0
18,680


+1 Excacly ,why not just push it for at least 70% more power it would propably stop people ranting that their cards r not running as they should in games ,the next profit for games would be lesser upgrades, I mean I think its stupid and crazy to upgrade every like 7 to 8 months