Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > [Solved] Dell UltraSharp 2408WFP 24" Widescreen LCD Monitor

Best answer from cjl.

Word :    Username :           
 

So, here is my question....Is the price of an M-PVA panel worth the quality bump up from a TN. I've always used TN panels with low response times and have found them more than adequate. I don't really do photo editing or anything like that, but I love pushing video games with all the settings turned up. That being said, im particularly interested in the "better color reproduction". I know it's mostly for photo editing and rendering, but i do like having the best. In your guys opinion, is the price difference worth it in my case?

------------------------------ "Since the dawn of time, man has dreamed of blotting out the Sun." - J. Montgomery Burns

jaguarskx wrote :

The 2408WFD is know to have relatively high input lag; over 40ms, you might want to take that into consideration.


They've improved it a lot in the recent revisions - I have an A01, and I find it completely usable for gaming, and the new ones should be A02, with even less lag than the A01. A00 was terrible though.

Oh, and just so you know, the Dell is an S-PVA, not M-PVA. I definitely think it's worth the money - it's visibly better than any TN panel I have ever seen. I thought it was a waste until I saw one for myself, and since then, I'm hooked.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

If possible it would be best to try and hunt down a pva or ips based lcd to see the difference.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger

The 2408WFD is know to have relatively high input lag; over 40ms, you might want to take that into consideration.

------------------------------ Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP

Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
Reply to jaguarskx
Best answer

jaguarskx wrote :

The 2408WFD is know to have relatively high input lag; over 40ms, you might want to take that into consideration.


They've improved it a lot in the recent revisions - I have an A01, and I find it completely usable for gaming, and the new ones should be A02, with even less lag than the A01. A00 was terrible though.

Oh, and just so you know, the Dell is an S-PVA, not M-PVA. I definitely think it's worth the money - it's visibly better than any TN panel I have ever seen. I thought it was a waste until I saw one for myself, and since then, I'm hooked.

------------------------------ Asus P6T deluxe
i7 965 @ 4.2GHz (200*21), 1.384V
12GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 CAS 7
Reply to cjl

Yeah, I've read two reviews on that one monitor, and both have said it was "fine for gaming", ie, the response time isn't a factor. It did cross my mind....but yeah, sadly, i don't have access to one, all my friends are in the same TN boat as me. Thanks for the responses.

------------------------------ "Since the dawn of time, man has dreamed of blotting out the Sun." - J. Montgomery Burns
Reply to hypocrisyforever
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > [Solved] Dell UltraSharp 2408WFP 24" Widescreen LCD Monitor
Go to:

There are 1226 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them