Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Would you keep this CPU or RMA it?

Would you keep this CPU or RMA it?

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - Would you keep this CPU or RMA it?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Based on the pictures below. Would you keep this CPU or RMA it?




Warning, if you click on "see results", you won't be able to vote
Word :    Username :           
 

Check out the pictures of the Sensor Tests. My E8400's temp sensors are both stuck. If you were me and you could RMA this CPU, would you keep it or RMA it?

Sensor Test 1: http://i37.tinypic.com/jj9pmr.jpg
Sensor Test 2: http://i37.tinypic.com/k1q3hi.jpg
Total PC Up time: http://i38.tinypic.com/2ez466t.jpg
Intel Convo: http://i38.tinypic.com/261oxh2.jpg

I have owned this E8400 since April 2009. I have kept it at stock settings and it has been great. But the Sensors are stuck. I am going to Overclock my computer soon, and I want to know what my Idle and Load temps are accurately, if at all possible. I would hate to OC the CPU, have it die on me due to false temp readings, and then not be able to RMA it. So what would you do?

My Specs:

Antec 900,
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3ghz,
Arctic Cooling Freezer Pro 7 with: Arctic Silver 5,
GigaByte GA-EP45-UD3R,
EVGA GTX 260 Core 216 Superclocked,
Antec EarthWatts EA650 PSU,
G.Skill 4GB DDR2 1066,
Western Digital 500GB 7200RPM SATA3Gb/s 32MB Cache,
Acer X193W+BD 19in LCD

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

have you tried using core temp to run a comparisson ?

Reply to ulysses35

ulysses35 wrote :

have you tried using core temp to run a comparisson ?


Yeah.

http://i38.tinypic.com/25gxqm8.jpg

Reply to Renuts

That is rough for OCing. Do you think they would accept that as defective though, or since the chip works otherwise, would they reject it?

------------------------------ New Build : Intel Core i5 750 > Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P > 2x2GB GSkill 1600MHz CL7 1.65V > Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB >
Antec 300 Illusion > Asus 4850 512MB w/AM Cooler > Corsair 650HX > CM Hyper 212 Plus > Other: PII 940/Gigabyte 790GX/4850 1G

 

Reply to EXT64

Might as well send it back....lol what kind of name is Adolfo..

Reply to bige420

What kind of heatsink do you have? Do you clean it regularly?

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by flabbergasted on 11-06-2009 at 04:13:42 AM
Reply to flabbergasted

Renuts wrote :


My Specs:

Antec 900,
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3ghz,
Arctic Cooling Freezer Pro 7 with: Arctic Silver 5,
GigaByte GA-EP45-UD3R,
EVGA GTX 260 Core 216 Superclocked,
Antec EarthWatts EA650 PSU,
G.Skill 4GB DDR2 1066,
Western Digital 500GB 7200RPM SATA3Gb/s 32MB Cache,
Acer X193W+BD 19in LCD



flabbergasted wrote :

What kind of heatsink do you have? Do you clean it regularly?


Arctic Cooling Freezer Pro 7- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6835186134 with Arctic Silver 5 Thermal Compound- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6835100007
It has been reseated multiple times with the same results. It has always been attached properly.

I clean the whole computer thoroughly every time I notice it is getting too dusty. Once every 2 months or so(My room is pretty dusty). I also have the Antec 900 fans on high(3 120mm and 1 200m) so its moving a lot of air, and that's going to add to the dust.

Reply to Renuts

EXT64 wrote :

That is rough for OCing. Do you think they would accept that as defective though, or since the chip works otherwise, would they reject it?


I think they will accept it because I have read about a lot of other peoples being accepted for the same reason. From multiple sources and for multiple "E" CPU's. And if you click on the link I posted above you can read the conversation I had with "Adolfo" from Intel. I understand that isn't a promise. But it sounds pretty promising to me. But I don't really care who says they don't think they'll take it back, I've read plenty about it and I've talked to Intel.


Anyways, At this point I am going to keep the CPU. It appears to be reading core temps past 39C properly. Unless something else comes up, I will most likely be keeping this CPU. But please, Keep voting if you know what you would do.

Thanks for the responses.


Message edited by Renuts on 11-06-2009 at 05:52:44 AM
Reply to Renuts

Common problem with this series of processors, and yes Intel normally would replace it. What you MAY have a problem with is the time that has elapsed, you really should have done this months ago........just have to call and ask them I guess.

Reply to jitpublisher

RMA, technically the processor isn't working to spec, granted its only the thermal sensor, but it is defective

Reply to mindless728

If you're saying that for the 6 months you've used this processor, the temps have never varied, then I would RMA it for defective temps sensors. I've never heard of anyone using a technique to "unstick" temp sensors.

Did you try Prime 95 while running Real Temp?

Reply to HundredIslandsBoy

HundredIslandsBoy wrote :


Did you try Prime 95 while running Real Temp?


Yea I did. Didn't you look at these first two screenshots I posted? I couldn't do those Sensor Tests without Prime 95.



I don't know what I'm going to do. I'm not going to be on the PC much lately so I might just RMA it. I've got an idea.

Reply to Renuts

Renuts,

There's another alternative that so far, hasn't been mentioned; the 3rd sensor in your dual core processor, which is CPU temperature. Your screen shot shows a normal and healthy CPU temperature response in Hardware Monitor.

It's been well documented that Intel manufactured many 45 nanometer Core 2 Quad's and Duo's with Digital Thermal Sensors (DTS) which can "stick" below 50c. Intel has repeatedly stated that the DTS is not designed for temperature monitoring; it's designed for overtemp protection only, such as Throttle and Shutdown, so you don't toast your transistors. This means that users typically get reasonably accurate load temperatures, but not idle temperatures.

Intel intends users to instead rely on CPU temperature, which is designed to show a linear response across the entire thermal range from low idle temperatures thru high load temperatures. This is why motherboard manufacturers, as per agreement with Intel, include a monitoring utility on the driver CD that shows CPU temperature only, but not Core temperatures. Moreover, the Thermal Specifications shown in Intel's Processor Spec Finder http://processorfinder.intel.com/Default.aspx - is Tcase Max (CPU temperature) not Tjunction (Core temperature), which is a very common misconception among most enthusiasts.

Although the accuracy of CPU temperature depends upon which BIOS version you're running and how accurately it was encoded, there's a consistent 5c gradient between CPU temperature and "mean" or average Core temperatures when calibrated during 100% workload with Prime95 Small FFT's. Since Real Temp doesn't monitor CPU temperature, and Hardware Monitor can't be calibrated, CPU temperature and Core temperatures can be individually calibrated in Everest Ultimate, which you already have. Since your CPU temperature shows a 3c gradient, simply give it a -2 offset, and you'll have accurate CPU temperatures from idle thru load.

If you'd like to learn more about temperatures, then just click on the link in my signature.

Hope this helps,

Comp :sol:


Message edited by CompuTronix on 11-09-2009 at 06:39:07 PM
Reply to CompuTronix

Thank you for the detailed information. I very much appreciate it.

Reply to Renuts
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Would you keep this CPU or RMA it?
Go to:

There are 741 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them