are you sure, in the future games might dedecate PhysX more though I emagine, is it possible even with a 295 a dedecated PhysX card will have some benefit soon?
If it were ever needed I think it's going to be at a point in time when the GTX 295 will be considered quite a low end and not very powerful card, in other words it's not going to happen any time soon.
just to finish off this thread I decided to try a 9800GT with my 295 and there is a huge difference in deffinetly a game like Warmonger where it is completely based on PhysX and I got a bunch of PhysX demos so even though I have a GTX 295 a dedicated PhysX card is beneficial.
It's honestly 10 FPS faster with 9800 GT and 10 FPS slower with the GTX 295 (these are average frame rates) after just using the application Fraps. It's about 10 FPS on both Batman: Arkham Asylum Demo and in Warmonger.
So what do you guys think is that a huge difference? Before I measured the difference it seemed like a huge difference I imagined like 30 FPS difference but obvisouly it's not quite a huge performance boost. It is a welcome performance boost though.
he meant that you were sure there was no reason behind having a dedicated PhysX card if you have a GTX 295 and that was proven wrong and there for he assumed that you felt bad.
he meant that you were sure there was no reason behind having a dedicated PhysX card if you have a GTX 295 and that was proven wrong and there for he assumed that you felt bad.
precisely
------------------------------Core i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz - Asus P6T - 12GB Corsair XMS 3 - 2X ATI 58701GB Crossfire- Zalman 850W - X-FI Fatality Gamer Pro - Xigmatek Thor's Hammer - Raptor X 150 - WD Black 1TB OCZ Vertex Turbo 120 GB SSD - Cosmos S Case w/side window + 8X 120mm fans
Reply to annisman
If you feel that 10fps is worth it then good for you, as far as I'm concerned it most certainly is not and thus I stand by my original statement and feel quite good about it actually, sorry annisman you assumed wrong.
Having a dedicated card is useless. I added a 9600gso as a dedicated physics card paired up with 2 gtx260 sli. Performance in UT3/Warmonger were the same if not lower. If you have a powerful card then let it handle the physics don't add a weaker card. On the other hand if you have a 9600gt and adding 8600gts for dedicated physics i can imagine it would be useful and work!
Message edited by invisik on 09-10-2009 at 02:07:52 AM
The room your computer is in will heat up faster. That may be a benefit in the winter. Otherwise it's a big waste or money. I could add one on my PCI-E Gen2 x4 slot, but it would be there only to fill an empty slot. Not many "good" games use PhysX. Mirror's Edge being one of the only ones I really enjoy. Save your money and leave it in the bank.
Message edited by one-shot on 09-10-2009 at 10:16:55 AM
------------------------------Antec P182, i7 920 3.7Ghz @ 1.3V, Xigmatek 1283, Asus P6T X58, 3 x 2048MB OCZ Plat DDR3 1600 RAM, 2 EVGA GTX260 Core 216 in SLI, WD 160gb,320GB 1TB WD Black. Corsair 750TX. Acer 24" Monitor. Vista x64 Home Premium.
Reply to one-shot
yah I actually like haveing a low end graphics card in my computer for PhysX and you're right there arn't really any games that are good on the spectrum that really support PhysX and I never played Mirrors Edge but it looked boooooring. One game that does support PhysX though is Batman: Arkham Asylum and this game is super fun after playing the demo. Right my room gets disgusting, muggy and hot. And this card is basicly to fill up space, I have a 295 and I'm not going to spend another 500 doallars for another one, I spent $70 on my 9800GT.
You like having a low end card for physics? Have you seen any real advantages with it? I have never seen any real benefits in my rig when i had a dedicated card for physics.
I don't think a separate PhysX card will do good with GTX295 on a 20" display. GTX295 would be more than enough for that display. I don't know about FullHD
Message edited by meodowla on 09-10-2009 at 01:45:10 PM
If you feel that 10fps is worth it then good for you, as far as I'm concerned it most certainly is not and thus I stand by my original statement and feel quite good about it actually, sorry annisman you assumed wrong.
actually the OP said that with a card it was 10fps faster and without it was 10fps slower....which = 20fps gain, don't worry I did the math for you. And yes I think that's a great gain.
actually the OP said that with a card it was 10fps faster and without it was 10fps slower....which = 20fps gain, don't worry I did the math for you. And yes I think that's a great gain.
So by your logic, there should be a step in the middle. Did he install half the card?