So, I'm in the market for a new computer, but I'm on a pretty strict budget. I want the entire thing to come in under $900 (including monitor) and I've allotted around $400 for CPU and GPU. I have another "productivity" machine, so this would be PURELY for gaming. Most of that gaming will be World of Warcraft. Thus, my question:
How much more should I spend on the GPU over CPU? Or should they be equal?
CPU = GPU ---- For example, if I get the Core i5 750 ($200) then I'd be looking at the HD 4890 ($200).
CPU < GPU ---- If I get a Phenom II X4 940 ($160) then I could get the HD 4850 x2 ($230).
CPU << GPU -- I mean, it's even possible for me to go into $100 CPU-range (Athlon X4 620 or Phenom X2 555) and get an HD 5850 ($300).
I want there to be NO bottleneck. I don't want a CPU that is wasting power because the GPU can't process graphics. And I don't want a GPU that is being CPU-limited. Suggestions?
How much more should I spend on the GPU over CPU? Or should they be equal?
CPU = GPU ---- For example, if I get the Core i5 750 ($200) then I'd be looking at the HD 4890 ($200).
CPU < GPU ---- If I get a Phenom II X4 940 ($160) then I could get the HD 4850 x2 ($230).
CPU << GPU -- I mean, it's even possible for me to go into $100 CPU-range (Athlon X4 620 or Phenom X2 555) and get an HD 5850 ($300).
I want there to be NO bottleneck. I don't want a CPU that is wasting power because the GPU can't process graphics. And I don't want a GPU that is being CPU-limited. Suggestions?