I saw this post (http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-sff,2312.html),and wanted to duplicate that build with a few modifications. Here is what I came up with:
Minus the software and shipping, I came out only about $4 more expensive than the original build system. Were my changes that I made good ideas? I changed the Motherboard, Memory, Case, Optical, and Power Source.
This would be my first time building a computer. I could spend $420 more and buy an overclocked system (factory to 3.7Ghz), with Corsair Dominator 1600Mhz memory, a GTX 285 instead of dual 260, various other additional things, and a 3 year warranty from cyberpowerpc. Would that be a better idea?
Power Supply- Upgrade to In-Win Power Supplies 750 Watts Commander
Video Card- Bump it up to EVGA 2GB GTX 285
Speakers- Add 600Watts PMPO Subwoofer Stereo Speakers (600Watts PMPO Subwoofer Stereo Speakers)
Network- Intel Pro Gigabite 10/100/1000 Network Card (Intel Pro Gigabite 10/100/1000 Network Card)
Wireless Network Card- Zonet ZEW1642 IEEE 802.11b/g/n
Bluetooth- USB Bluetooth 2.0 Adapter (USB Bluetooth 2.0 Adapter)
OS- Microsoft® Windows® XP Home Edition w/ Service Pack 3
OFFICE SUITE- $50 off Mail-in Rebate) Microsoft® Office Home and Student 2007
Message edited by the_eliminator on 08-30-2009 at 03:07:59 AM
That motherboard is pricey for me, but I think it would serve you well.
Well those are the overclocked GTX 260s from BFG. Is the Core 216 better than the OC version? The RAM seems like a good substitute. How would the 7 latency differ from 9? I'm relatively new to all this so bear with me
Honestly I'm not sure if the Core 216 would be faster than the factory shipped OC version. I guarantee you if you use that fancy motherboard and overclock them, then they would be faster no doubt. ^_^ The difference between the two is the 216 version essentially has more stream processors unlocked. I personally think of RAM latency as like a response time. The lower it is, the faster it is. Keep in mind those numbers are in milliseconds, but it can still be a noticeable difference in performance.
Don't worry about being new. You seem to know a lot already and you are asking questions which is good, and you are actually willing to listen to the answers, which is pretty much awesome. ^_^
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Comb [...] 11-119-137 Combo Discount: -$15.00 Combo Price: $164.98 Free Shipping*
Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium SP1 64-bit for System Builders w/ Tech Guarantee - OEM | Includes free Windows 7 upgrade coupon COOLER MASTER RC-690-KKN1-GP Black SECC/ ABS ATX Mid Tower Computer Case - Retail
The Core 216 GPU is faster than the old overclocked GPU. You definitely want the Core 216 version.
6GB is an absolute waste with a 32-bit OS. You will have about half of your RAM available unless you go with a 64-bit OS. I would get 64-bit Vista Home Premium with the free upgrade to Windows 7. Windows Vista works fine and Windows 7 is very nice. Putting an 8-year-old OS on a nice build like that is silly.
I actually like that Why_Me build a lot. The dual GTX 275 would me more than worth the drop of some of the pricier parts. Since those come OC out of the box, how much more could you push them? Does anyone else have any suggestions/alternatives for his build? Also, what all parts would I be tuning/OCing once I put this together.
I actually like that Why_Me build a lot. The dual GTX 275 would me more than worth the drop of some of the pricier parts. Since those come OC out of the box, how much more could you push them? Does anyone else have any suggestions/alternatives for his build? Also, what all parts would I be tuning/OCing once I put this together.
Within a few minutes you can have your cpu o/c at 3.6GHz or more... That board comes with easy o/c utilities. I would add a couple more 120mm case fans...that Cooler Master 690 holds up to 7 of them. You can get some decent Masscool 120mm case fans @ newegg for $5 ea.
------------------------------"God invented Google so you would stop asking stupid questions."
Reply to Why_Me