Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > [Solved] Alternative to Intel's atom

[Solved] Alternative to Intel's atom

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs [Solved] Alternative to Intel's atom

Best answer from BadTrip.

Word :    Username :           
 

Is there a mobo+cpu that comes close to atom's power consumption , and that can be used on the desktop ?
These are my options :-

1. Use Intel atom
2. Get some laptop cpu to work with a power efficient micro-Atx mobo. can someone think of such a combo ?
3. Find some low wattage desktop cpu+mobo. I don't think there is any.

I have my reasons for avoiding atom and Via's nano. Would love to hear suggestions for cpu+mobo combo that is ultra low in power consumption.

Thanks

Reply to chesss
Register or log in to remove.

an AMD single core Athlon

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819103240

this with

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6813153120

would be way more powerful but it was the cheapest and lowest power set i could find

Reply to Upendra09

Thanks for this. How much power will this combo use at Load ?
Also cost isn't the issue for me right now. Low power is. Its not for my normal rig but for a project (sortof) I have to work on.

Reply to chesss

a 250 watt power supply should suffice

Reply to Upendra09

again this is still very powerful compared to the atom but u can probably get cheper stuff on ebay

Reply to Upendra09

Quote :

a 250 watt power supply should suffice


Oh I am not worried about that. I want to know the actual power consumption of such a setup (in Watts)..

Reply to chesss

How many Watts are you aiming for?

Reply to BadTrip

i got around 125 watts depending on USB and optical drives

go here and put in ur config and see what u get

http://extreme.outervision.com/PSUEngine

Reply to Upendra09

Quote :

How many Watts are you aiming for?


80W max at load (including Hdd, ram etc)
I'll be using laptop Hdd and dvd-drive

Reply to chesss

chesss wrote :

Would love to hear suggestions for cpu+mobo combo that is ultra low in power consumption.

 

You won't find another x86 CPU with as low a power consumption as an Atom and better performance, but there are plenty which can give better performance per watt with higher total power consumption. Tom's has had a number of 'Atom vs X' articles for various CPUs comparing performance per watt.

 

You probably want to look for the lowest idle power and then consider underclocking until the maximum load power is less than your limit. Even the i5s may be good enough if you underclock them, their idle power looks pretty good.


Message edited by MarkG on 11-21-2009 at 07:48:40 PM
Reply to MarkG

Quote :

Motherboard runs about 35W

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6813128357

how did you manage to figure out the motherboards power consumption please?


From the article Badtrip posted -

Quote :

Power required to finish the SYSmark 2007 Preview was smaller as well, hence this board won the battle for performance per watt. The only stain was the slightly higher peak power of 61 W as opposed to 60 W with the Gigabyte board.T


is this referring to the total power consumption (including ram,hdd) or just the power consumption of the mobo+cpu ?

Its sleep time now. thanks for all the suggestions. I'll do my research tommorow...


Message edited by chesss on 11-21-2009 at 08:06:29 PM
Reply to chesss

OK I am confused. According to this article the max power consumption of the whole setup is only 60W .
Q1. ) is this correct? does the whole system really consume only 60W
Q2. ) is this the psu input value or output value ?

ty

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by chesss on 11-22-2009 at 11:19:48 AM
Reply to chesss

chesss wrote :

OK I am confused. According to this article the max power consumption of the whole setup is only 60W .
Q1. ) is this correct? does the whole system really consume only 60W
Q2. ) is this the psu input value or output value ?

ty



Thats at the plug. Meaning everything in that PC uses a total draw of 60w from the plug in the wall.

Reply to jimmysmitty

^ok.. this is really really good. 60 W at the wall is a bit unbelievable considering taht most rigs go at about 200-300w , atleast thats what everyone says..

Thanks all for replying ,specially badtrip

Reply to chesss

One last question
Here is the setup that consumes only 60W at load-

Quote :

CPU II Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 (45 nm, 2.53 GHz, 3 MB L2 Cache)
Mainboard II Gigabyte EG31MF-S2, Rev. 1.1
Intel G31, BIOS: F4g
RAM 2x 2 GB DDR2-1066 Chaintech AU2G732-12GH001
HDD Seagate Barracuda 7200.11, 500 GB
7,200 RPM, SATA/300, 32 MB cache
DVD LG GGW-H20L



Can a laptop like external 80-90W PSU be used for this ? Ofcourse the necessary connecting wires would be absent in an external PSU.

Reply to chesss
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > [Solved] Alternative to Intel's atom
Go to:

There are 2084 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
TP-750 + Gigabyte GTX670 Windforce OC, how to wire up?
By rolli59, 4 hours ago:

1) Yes
2) Yes
I would use both none modular cables!

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts