I have been looking at getting either a 250 or a 4850 but didnt know how much of a perfomance jump it would be so which one should i get and how big would the jump be ?
Sadly i cant afford anything better and my psu woudlnt handle them anyway.
Are you running into any problems on current games? If not, I'd try waiting if it isn't urgent and saving up. Maybe in 6 months or so you'll be able to skip directly to ATI or NVidia DX11. 8800GTS to either of the above would improve a little, but probably not enough to justify the cost.
------------------------------New Build (Under Contruction): Intel Core i5 750 > Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P > 2x2GB GSkill 1600MHz CL7 1.65V > Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB > Antec 300 Illusion > Asus 4850 512MB w/AM Cooler > Corsair 650HX > Hyper 212 Plus > See other Builds in Member Config
Reply to EXT64
the 250 is not much better than what you have. The 4850 not going to give you a drastic improvement either but is better than the 250.
That were true if he had the 8800GTS 512mb (G92), but he has the 8800GTS 320mb (G80), so there will definitely be some improvements, but it won't be twice as fast (get the 4850 because it's cheaper and the 250 isn't really better.)
------------------------------CPU: Intel Core i7 920 @3.2Ghz, MOBO: Asus P6T SE, RAM: 3x 2gb OCZ Platinum OCZ3P1600LV6GK, GPU: Sapphire HD 5870, PSU: Corsair HX520W, HDD: Seagate ST31000528AS 1Tb 32mb, COOLER: Scythe Mugen (S775 version), CASE: Coolermaster CM690
Reply to Gulli
"The Radeon HD 4770 is able to beat the HD 4830 and the Geforce 9800 GT most of the time and sometimes even get on the level of cards that are more expensive like the Radeon HD 4850 or the Geforce 9800 GTX."
The chart you're looking at includes pricing, so they're saying that the 4770 gives you a better bang for you buck. If you're looking at sheer performance, the 4850 will win.
Message edited by mavanhel on 09-24-2009 at 03:37:43 PM