you need to make your wishlist public, and there is no i7 socket or i5 socket, there are i7's available on both LGA 1366 and LGA 1156. Its easier if you follow this template and link to the parts you are considering.
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ild-advice
Thanks Mind! So, any comments on the final bag of parts?? I'm mainly just unsure on the video card, if the PSU cables will be able to reach everything, and if everything will fit nice together.
I'm assuming you're not going to be doing any gaming at all with the system based on your GPU choice.
That's a big HELL NO! on the PSU. The little red voltage switch and 70% efficiency are a dead give away of a POS. This PSU is the same price and much higher quality.
Actually, a better idea might be to ditch the LGA 1366 i7 build and get a build around the new LGA 1156 i7. Let me see what I can come up with in the next couple minutes.
Or you could go with the GA-P55M-UD2 and i7 860 and still get the 4870 too.
With OC'ing (or TurboBoost) the differences between the i7 860 and i5 750 aren't going to be all that great.
Check out this article (and the benchmarks) to look at the trade off in price vs performance: i7 860 / i5 750
The fastest one would be on 1366. 1156 will most likely be for the mainstream and compete directly with AMD.
It's not quite that simple - especially when you're considering the 'budget$' most people have to work with. And what they want to do with them.
In that benchmark you see a i5 750 / P55 combo beating the i7 920 / X58.
And you'd expect the i7 860 / P55 combo to be at or just above the i7 950 benchmark.
In almost all of the media content creation bench's I've seen the 15 750 is close to the i7 920, and especially the i7 860/870 surpass the i7 920.
Check the reviews - look at the benchmarks that most closely resemble the way you'll use your machine. Bounce that against your budget. A little bit less media creation power for more gaming satisfaction potential? Thats about how my suggested i5 750 / HD 4870 suggestion rolls out.
Message edited by WR2 on 09-09-2009 at 07:20:46 PM
Allot of similiar pricing ~ I guess I want to know what will be most upgradeable in the future, or what board will support the fastest future CPU's ??
It's not easy to point to one socket as being 'most upgradeable'. Both will be around for some time to come. 1366 is definitely the higher end but you 'pay to play' to get into the deeper water there. 1156 and 1366 will both take the next gen 32nm Westmere CPUs from what we're hearing. It's a trade off between what you want and what you can afford.
edit;
here is a list of reviews for the i5 750 & i7 860/870 launch: DailyTech review list
Message edited by WR2 on 09-09-2009 at 07:19:47 PM
OK ~ So it seems when I want to upgrade in 3 years, I'll probably be better off having a 1366 mobo to work with. (I know it's only speculation). At that time, the i7-975 Extreme Edition CPU's should be bargain basement cheap.
Planning on CPU uprades seems kind of outdated at this point. The clock speeds on these i5/i7 are the same as the previous core2s which are the same as the original pentium 4. Until CPU MHz starts increasing again, swapping CPUs in the same socket isnt going to provide much benefit if you overclock anyway.
When I think upgradeability now I think in terms of having excess power, space and airflow for adding additional GPUs, Hard Drives, SSDs and RAM to extend the life of the CPU/Motherboard, not replacing the CPU itself.
Message edited by dndhatcher on 09-09-2009 at 09:44:59 PM
If the idea is to upgrade to a 6 core i9 in a year or two then 1366 isnt a better option, its the only option.
He is talking about 3 years out. At 3 years out we have no idea. The thing to get could be the AM4 socket motherboard with PCIEx32 slots and an HD 6890 Open GL 6 compatible GPU. In any case a 975 isnt a very substantial upgrade to an overclocked 920.
Both sockets have an 32nm Westmere upgrade path.
Westmere/Gulftown 32nm 1366
Westmere/Clarkdale 32nm 1156
DNDHATCHER is right that a mid-life CPU upgrade wouldn't be a huge upgrade. It's why most of us with 65nm C2D's aren't rushing to upgrade to 45nm C2Ds.
In 2010 it will be SandyBridge which will be the first likely candidate for a decent CPU upgrade.
As yet there is no info on SandyBridge socket requirements.
I cant see either the 1156 or 1366 having the lifespan that the 775 did. They cant improve performance with higher MHz or more cores on the same size chip anymore, they have to change the architecture to improve. That likely means socket changes every few years to support greater throughput and/or different core architectures.