Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > NAS/RAID > RAID0: strange after effect- need help!

RAID0: strange after effect- need help!

Forum Storage : NAS/RAID RAID0: strange after effect- need help!

Word :    Username :           
 

Hi everyone,
I have just enabled RAID0 with the JMicron RAID setup and the respective drivers. Everything works fine. HD Tune picks up the new RAID array as Main Disk, what I named it, and a size of 2000GB. And the speeds confirmed it was running properly. However, in 'My Computer', the hdd size is 1000GB and is named Partition 1. This is exactly how one of the drives was before I set up raid. Why is 'My Computer' not properly picking up the RAID array?
Thank you for any help!


Message edited by olivierhacking on 07-13-2011 at 01:38:37 PM
Reply to olivierhacking
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

If the disk was partitioned before you put it into the RAID-0 array then the system may be reading the old partition table and taking it as gospel. Go into Disk Management, delete the old partition and create a new one - that should fix the problem.

Reply to sminlal

Should I make the new partition a full 2TB size?

Reply to olivierhacking
- 0 +

If you want to use all the space on the RAID volume then make it a 2TB partition.

Reply to sminlal

Hi,
I made the partition as large as I could- namely 1.8TB. There is 15gb of unallocated space which I cannot add into the large partition. Anyway, thanks for telling me how to do this :) Is it normal that I do not notice a decrease in game loading times compared to before I setup RAID0 ?

Reply to olivierhacking

You are most likely encountering the MBR limitation, you can convert the volume to GPT to access the rest of the space if this is not a boot volume. Yes you should notince a decrease in load times with RAID 0 since your throughput will essentially double.

Reply to tokencode
- 0 +

You'll only notice a difference for those programs that are actually on the RAID-0 volume, and then only if there are just a few program files that are fairly large. If there are a lot of smaller files that need to be loaded then RAID-0 won't show much of a performance increase (RAID-0 can improve transfer rates, but not access times).

Reply to sminlal

Hmm, all my files were on the one partition which I extended to use the full space of the two HDDs. But I notice no difference in startup time of Windows, application loading times and game loqading times. And tokencode, what is a MBR limitation? And yes, I use this drive as a boot drive. Also while recording, the fps goes even lower than before I had RAID0. I think the problem may be that Windows is only using one of the hard drives, because of the original partition?
In the benchmark, the access time is 16.4ms and average transfer speed is 149 mb/s

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by olivierhacking on 07-14-2011 at 09:19:37 AM
Reply to olivierhacking

MBR limit is 2TB, but remeber that a k is really 1024 not 1,000 so this may show as 1.8TB

16.4ms random access is very high. If its a RAID 0 at the controller level, it couldn't possibly use a single disk.

Reply to tokencode

What do you mean with it couldnt possibly use a single disk if its raid0 at the controller level?

Reply to olivierhacking

olivierhacking wrote :

Hmm, all my files were on the one partition which I extended to use the full space of the two HDDs. But I notice no difference in startup time of Windows, application loading times and game loqading times. And tokencode, what is a MBR limitation? And yes, I use this drive as a boot drive. Also while recording, the fps goes even lower than before I had RAID0. I think the problem may be that Windows is only using one of the hard drives, because of the original partition?
In the benchmark, the access time is 16.4ms and average transfer speed is 149 mb/s



I'd say your main reason for seeing this is because you're using a JMicron RAID Controller and Software RAID with Windows. These JMicron controllers don't have the greatest performance for onboard RAID compared to Nvidia or Intel. If you truly want to see better performance from a RAID setup, use a Hardware RAID controller like Adaptec or LSI.

------------------------------ Lian Li PC60B Aluminum Chassis |Intel DZ68DB ATX Motherboard | Intel Core i7-2600K Processor |12GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333Mhz Memory | SAPPHIRE TOXIC Radeon HD 5850 1GB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express Video Card | O/S - Intel X25-M 80GB MLC SSD | Gaming – 74GB W
Reply to 3xch4ng3
- 0 +

olivierhacking wrote :

But I notice no difference in startup time of Windows, application loading times and game loqading times.

To significantly speed up those kinds of tasks you need a drive with faster access times, and RAID-0 will NOT give you that (nor will any other RAID organization). You may be able to measure the slight wall-clock improvement that RAID-0's faster transfer rates will give you, but chances are you won't notice it in practice.

Reply to sminlal

olivierhacking wrote :

What do you mean with it couldnt possibly use a single disk if its raid0 at the controller level?


After enabling RAID, did you create a 2 TB RAID 0 using both 1 TB hard disks and then reinstall Windows? If not, did you enable RAID on the controller and then expand the first disk to create a 1.8 TB partition? The speed would indicate that this is what you might have done.

Reply to GhislainG

What is the model of drive you are using for your RAID 0 set? 16.4ms access time is extrememly highly, 3 times higher than a good quality 7200rpm drive today. Are these 5400s?

sminlal, while its true RAID 0 doesn't decrease access times, it does increase throughput which will improve boot/game and application load times. I think the improvement in throughput would be a noticable improvement, depending on the type of reads being done (small number of large reads versus many smaller ones).


What I meant by that it couldn't be a single drive if the controller shows RAID 0 is that most controllers do not allow you to create a RAID 0 array from a single disk. Technically a single disk is RAID 0 with a single strip I guess, but normally this would be setup as a standalone disk not "RAID"

3xch4ng3 is also correct in stating that it could be an issue with your RAID controller. Have you checked for any firmware/driver updates? Have you tried the drives on another controller or another controller on the drives?

Reply to tokencode
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > NAS/RAID > RAID0: strange after effect- need help!
Go to:

There are 2175 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
HDD Setup Help
By price_th, 1 day ago:

Yes, Window will create a partition on a drive with none.

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts