Archived from groups: alt.games.the-sims (
More info?)
"Lerren" <anaximander@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:LsqdnTRBjfYm24veRVn-2w@rogers.com...
> [deletia]
>
> Specific to New Orleans:
>
> Historically, the mississippi river delta has provided a significant
> amount of protection from recieving the *brunt* of hurricanes.
> However, the rapid rise over the last half century of housing built
> around cities, as well as a propensity to take more RISKS as far as
> where to build these houses, has also resulted in a greater hit this
> time.
>
> As well, the army corps of engineers, which built and maintains the
> levees, only built them to withstand a category 3 hurricane. It's my
> understanding that this was a category 4, broaching on 5 - they simply
> could not withstand the forces of water, wind, etc being thrown at it.
> The levees in new orleans were NOT like the dutch floodgates - in
> fact, i've heard several interesting comments coming from the
> netherlands about preparedness.
>
> Everywhere:
>
> There is a significant propensity to build in places which are
> popular, or have a great view, etc. Because the real estate market is
> the way it is, devellopers are fudging it, building cheaply in risky
> areas because it's what people are willing to pay for. Too few look at
> the potential for bad luck, and what exactly *could* happen. as an
> example, it's risky (er) to live in an apartment above 9 stories in a
> middle sized city - the ladder trucks reach to the 9th floor. (i live
> on the ninth floor for this reason). It's risky to live in any place
> that has had more than one major flood in the last 100 years - in
> canada, at least, insurance does not cover "acts of god" (whether you
> believe in such a deity or no), because they have no way of recouping
> their funds - there's nobody to sue.
>
> I am in no way saying that people who lived in new orleans are at
> fault for what happened - don't mistake me. I understand all too well
> the reasons for moving to an area that may or may not be the best
> place to live as far as these sorts of things go, but i DO think the
> entire situation could have been handled better as far as planned
> evacuation routes, etc - this is NOT like the tsunami, where one had
> seconds or *maybe* minutes to get out of harm's way. The hospitals
> should NOT have been in such a situation where they were having to
> airlift people off roofs, and especially in the case of the lower
> class who did NOT have access to cars, hotels, etc - there should have
> been an organized, planned route out of the city, and services
> provided to people who simply could not go it alone.
>
> just my two cents (and my daddy's an urban planner)
>
> ~Lerren
I know I would never want to live around the coastline anywhere. I don't
know where
these people are going to live. They say it is going to take a long time
to rebuild. This would
be the time to not rebuild I think. Of course, I'm just a nobody & don't
know anything. The
more I watch about this disaster, the worse it gets. It may not be
exactly like the tsunami, but
it's getting closer all the time. People who were actually close to the
tsunami are saying it, not me.