GTS 250 and game comparison

i wonder if i could play Frontlines Fuel of War with my graphics card on highest settings and a 1280 x 1024 resolution with 4aa and 8fsaa getting an average FPS over 60? Does anyone think so, since F:FOW is a newer game than Rainbow Six Vegas 2 and on that i was getting 80 FPS average with the same settings. On Cod 4 i get 100 FPS average with the same settings also. But with Turok, my FPS isn't soo good, that is another 128mb minimum graphics game but seems to stress my gpu.

cpu phenom ii 720 be. Memeory corsair 4gb 800mhz. I don't see how power supply gives better performance in games, it's either your graphics card doesn't work or it does. I already have the card. It's a Win Power 650 watt psu. It came with the case, but i thought since it is quite highly factory powered, eventhough it's not the best of quality it should cope with my GTS 250 fine. My GTS 250only requires 1 pci power connector and is 512mb. The PSU is probably 85 percent or over efficient. motherboard XFX geforce 8300. Quite a nice mid range micro ATX motherboard with Hybrid SLI. Got all the feature i need with 4 ram slots and other goodies etc.

Graphics are produced at the end by the card, but your entire system contributes to your FPS.

if G.R.A.W looks fairly realistic with i think 90 FPS avergage with those settings aught i to get relatively the same for F:FOW? I mean it's games like Far Cry 2 i understand that i don't think my graphics card will be superior in.