Hey guys i was wondering Would a 1024MB NVIDIA(R) GeForce(R) GTS 240 be good or 1792MB NVIDIA(R) GeForce(R) GTX 260 add $141.90 be worth the extra money?
What resolution are you playing at? an 896mb GTX260 is sufficient, you dont need the double memory. Where did you find a GTS240? Im unfamiliar with that card, did you mean a GTS250? The GTX260 is stronger than the GTS250 by a fair margin and is definitely worth the price premium, but only for an 896MB card.
its on the alienware australia website for the aurora and i play at 1600 by 1050 so the gtx 260 is a very powerful card
The GTX260 is actually a generation old at this point but is a good card for the money especially over a GTS250. The GTS250 even older tech and basically a 9800GTX+ rebadged. For 1600X1050 go for the GTX260 ( hopefully a GTX260 core 216)
------------------------------EP-45 UD3R/ E8400@3.6 wZerotherm Nirvana/4gb Corsair DDR2-800/EVGA 9800GTX+/Corsair 750TX/2xWD Black AALS 640gb RAID 0+1 Windows 7/2xWD Cavier 250gb RAID 0 Windows XP Pro/Seagate 160gb Backup/X-Fi Xtreme Gamer/Logitech Z-2300/SynchMaster 906BW/Antec 1200
Reply to anort3
I dont know what the prices are over there but over here the GTX260 is waaay overpriced (cheapest I found is $150 after rebate), especially with 4870 1GB going for $125 after rebate.
Message edited by zipzoomflyhigh on 10-07-2009 at 02:14:13 PM
What resolution are you playing at? an 896mb GTX260 is sufficient, you dont need the double memory. Where did you find a GTS240? Im unfamiliar with that card, did you mean a GTS250? The GTX260 is stronger than the GTS250 by a fair margin and is definitely worth the price premium, but only for an 896MB card.
GTS 240 is an OEM part. but they said that they will sell the card as discrete card later. but i'm not really sure when