Hi All,
First time overclocking and I just wanted to run my voltage reading by a more learned crowd. I am running a 2500k with a Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3 motherboard and a Corsair A50. I wanted to do some minor overclocking without manually tweaking any of the voltages.
I have increased my multiplier to 4.3x without changing any of the other settings in the BIOS. I have been able to run Prime95 without any problems for several hours with temps in the mid-60s. I am little confused about the voltages reading that I have been getting. I have listed the different readings below.
Vcore in BIOS front page: 1.368
CPU VCore in BIOS advanced voltage settings: 1.380
VID in coretemp during prime95: 1.4011
Core voltage in CPU-z during prime95: 1.056
I don't really understand why I get so many different readings/numbers from all of these different monitoring tools. I guess my first question is which of these voltages is accurate? And the second question is should worry about any of these numbers? I understand that by leaving things on default it is going to overvoltage the cpu a bit. But, I also understand that higher voltage is what really shortens the life of the cpu (provided the temps are good), and I read that keeping things under 1.4 is usually a good target.
Am I totally off base in worrying about this or should I actually get down to making some more detailed tweaks? I am content with the current multiplier reading and have no need/desire to push things higher.
Thanks!
Ljgrimm
First time overclocking and I just wanted to run my voltage reading by a more learned crowd. I am running a 2500k with a Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3 motherboard and a Corsair A50. I wanted to do some minor overclocking without manually tweaking any of the voltages.
I have increased my multiplier to 4.3x without changing any of the other settings in the BIOS. I have been able to run Prime95 without any problems for several hours with temps in the mid-60s. I am little confused about the voltages reading that I have been getting. I have listed the different readings below.
Vcore in BIOS front page: 1.368
CPU VCore in BIOS advanced voltage settings: 1.380
VID in coretemp during prime95: 1.4011
Core voltage in CPU-z during prime95: 1.056
I don't really understand why I get so many different readings/numbers from all of these different monitoring tools. I guess my first question is which of these voltages is accurate? And the second question is should worry about any of these numbers? I understand that by leaving things on default it is going to overvoltage the cpu a bit. But, I also understand that higher voltage is what really shortens the life of the cpu (provided the temps are good), and I read that keeping things under 1.4 is usually a good target.
Am I totally off base in worrying about this or should I actually get down to making some more detailed tweaks? I am content with the current multiplier reading and have no need/desire to push things higher.
Thanks!
Ljgrimm