APPROXIMATE PURCHASE DATE: This Weekend Or later if there is a big reason too BUDGET RANGE: $400 or CHEAPER
SYSTEM USAGE FROM MOST TO LEAST IMPORTANT: Gaming, internet, word processing
PARTS NOT REQUIRED: Monitor, keyboard, mouse, OS, speakers
PREFERRED WEBSITE(S) FOR PARTS: Newegg
PARTS PREFERENCES: None
OVERCLOCKING: Yeah SLI OR CROSSFIRE: probably not
MONITOR RESOLUTION: 1024x768 for now, soon upgrading to 1440x900
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Cheaper would be good, but not more expensive. Period.
thats a tough one... but you can get better performance from a amd setup.
phenom II x2+GIGABYTE GA-MA785GM-US2H combo http://www.newegg.com/Product/Comb [...] mbo.254105 get the same case and you have a way better computer in less, also, if you have balls you can try to unlock the cores and get X3 or X4 even.
All items actually have free shipping above.
Total $427 - $55mir = $372
If you wanted to spend upto the $400, theres these options:
Case upgrade: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] rder=PRICE Cases are very personal, stick with free shipping and you can get upto a $53 case.
Or, get the 245 or 250 CPU for $6 or $16 more respectively.
skora: I took the HDD, PSU, and GPU from your build, but MIR don't count. It needs to be $400 or less before rebates. I now have it down to $390 shipped. I would like to fit in an athlon II x2, but i can't find a decent mobo that can overclock that will fit in my budget, especially since the e5300 has the combo with the case.
Total delivered $401. There's still $35 in mirs if you want them.
The HDD I linked and had in my cart for the price calculations for the first build was actually a $80 1tb drive instead of the $50 500gb drive. So that build does come in under $400 before rebates. I like the one I've posted here better as it has a faster CPU and Mid ATX case instead of the mATX case. Since the case does come with a PSU, you could save another $40, but that is VERY risky.
assuming your build is at most 400$, cpu+case combo is $94.98, mb is $43.99 and gpu is 54.99$ (you've said mir doesn't count) that subtotal of 193.96. my suggestion values at 151.99$ for the combo and 34.99 for the case. subtotal of 186.98.
I'm pretty sure that the ati4200 is better than the 9600
assuming your build is at most 400$, cpu+case combo is $94.98, mb is $43.99 and gpu is 54.99$ (you've said mir doesn't count) that subtotal of 193.96. my suggestion values at 151.99$ for the combo and 34.99 for the case. subtotal of 186.98.
I'm pretty sure that the ati4200 is better than the 9600
I'm going to disagree with the general opinion here. If keeping things stock, the higher clocked AMD would be a good option (and not a bad option for OC either) But, since you are overclocking, the Pentium E5300 build offers better performance at this price.
And from this SBM: Clock for clock OC'ed Pentium dual core is even >= the PII X2 550 BE. (edit: need to go by productivity results, games the PII cleaned house with better GPU's)
http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] ,2424.html
Message edited by pauldh on 09-26-2009 at 07:16:36 AM
Since an aftermarket cooler is out of budget, I'm not going to be increasing voltages much, and I will probably be limited by heat. With that in mind, which one will give better 1440x900 gaming performance? Any other changes you would make?
Message edited by yoyojam55 on 09-26-2009 at 03:07:29 PM
IMO neither is a bad option and getting the most from your resolution will typically be limited by that 128-bit 9600GSO anyway. If you (or your friend) had no plans to OC, then I'd say steer towards the AMD. Max OC potential belongs to the E5300, but in the end either will offer plenty to serve well as your gaming CPU.
Change I'd want to make for a "better 1440x900 gaming experience" is swap in an HD 4850 for the 9600GSO. Of course , that's out of budget anyway.