Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > GT300 "Fermi" Game Performance Figures Leaked

GT300 "Fermi" Game Performance Figures Leaked

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - GT300 "Fermi" Game Performance Figures Leaked

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Ask the community Add a reply
Word :    Username :           
 
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
jennyh   10-14-2009 at 05:57:43 PM
- 0 +

Lol just no. 1680x1050 benchmarks, is that the best lcd's they have at nvidia hq?

Repeat after me - "this is bullshit".

Message quoted 2 times
------------------------------ AMD to make $1.5bn profit Q4, *gauranteed*
 Reply to jennyh
gamerk316   10-14-2009 at 06:44:39 PM
- 0 +

95% chance its BS, but thing is, thats around the performance I was predicting...

And BTW, 1680x1050 is a better testing metric then 1980x1200, where the CPU comes much more into play. Really, to trully test a GPU, 800x600 should be used to ensure the CPU isn't a factor.

Message quoted 4 times
------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/622598.png
 Reply to gamerk316
daedalus685   10-14-2009 at 06:45:47 PM
- 0 +

gamerk316 wrote :

95% chance its BS, but thing is, thats around the performance I was predicting...

 

And BTW, 1680x1050 is a better testing metric then 1980x1200, where the CPU comes much more into play. Really, to trully test a GPU, 800x600 should be used to ensure the CPU isn't a factor.

 

har har har :pt1cable:

 

Anyway. Youtube is clearly the new anand... It isn't a leak without speaker pumping metal.


Message edited by daedalus685 on 10-14-2009 at 06:47:43 PM
Reply to daedalus685
jennyh   10-14-2009 at 06:47:34 PM
- 0 +

gamerk316 wrote :

95% chance its BS, but thing is, thats around the performance I was predicting...

And BTW, 1680x1050 is a better testing metric then 1980x1200, where the CPU comes much more into play. Really, to trully test a GPU, 800x600 should be used to ensure the CPU isn't a factor.



uhh you got this wrong on so many fronts.

Message quoted 1 times
------------------------------ AMD to make $1.5bn profit Q4, *gauranteed*
 Reply to jennyh
daedalus685   10-14-2009 at 06:48:35 PM
- 0 +

jennyh wrote :

uhh you got this wrong on so many fronts.



I think even Gamerk gets to have fun with BS from time to time :P

Reply to daedalus685
The-Beast   10-14-2009 at 06:55:00 PM
- 0 +

Don't they call it GF100 internally? why would an internal leak have gt300 on it?

Reply to The-Beast
Harrisson   10-14-2009 at 07:12:44 PM
- 0 +

Its a fake, plain and simple.

------------------------------ go for the 5850 now and play games while the nvidiots wait for the ceo to show an actual working product. Techpowerup's W1zzard
 Reply to Harrisson
eklipz330   10-14-2009 at 07:25:01 PM
- 0 +

gamerk316 wrote :

95% chance its BS, but thing is, thats around the performance I was predicting...

 

And BTW, 1680x1050 is a better testing metric then 1980x1200, where the CPU comes much more into play. Really, to trully test a GPU, 800x600 should be used to ensure the CPU isn't a factor.

 

lol you have it so twisted

 

&& if this turns out to be real, im pretty sure they'll mark the prices at like $800, just because they can


Message edited by eklipz330 on 10-14-2009 at 07:27:12 PM
Reply to eklipz330
Bronze Graphics badge EXT64   10-14-2009 at 07:27:58 PM
- 0 +

Well, at least the blatant fakes are surfacing now. I was worried that these weren't even surfacing yet. This is the first step to credible info, next are "leaks" that are hard to tell if fake or not, then those that look semi plausible, etc.

------------------------------ Phenom II X4 940 BE 3.0GHz - 1.25V > GA-MA790GP-DS4H > XFX ATI 4850 1GB > 4GB OCZ Platinum 1066MHz 5-5-5-15-2T > PCP&C 610W
Athlon II X2 250 3.0GHz > GA-MA770T-UD3P > Sapphire ATI 4650 512MB DDR3 > 4GB OCZ Platinum 1600MHz@1066MHz > XP/Win7 Enter 64
 Reply to EXT64
jennyh   10-14-2009 at 07:30:31 PM
- 0 +

It's not real, what cpu wouldnt be bottlenecked long before those fps results? The 5870 is already bottlenecked by i7's at 4ghz in some games. 75fps average in crysis at those settings? I really dont think so, an i7 would bottleneck long before that.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by jennyh on 10-14-2009 at 07:30:56 PM
------------------------------ AMD to make $1.5bn profit Q4, *gauranteed*
 Reply to jennyh
chunkymonster   10-14-2009 at 07:31:22 PM
- 0 +

jennyh wrote :

Lol just no. 1680x1050 benchmarks, is that the best lcd's they have at nvidia hq?

Repeat after me - "this is bullshit".



Bullshit!

------------------------------ ASRock X58 Extreme - Core i7 920 - 6GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3 1600 - Sapphire 4890 2GB - Creative Xtreme Gamer - 4-80GB WD in RAID0 on HighPoint RR 2310 as OS drive - 1-320GB WD scratch drive - Corsair CMPSU 750TX - HAF 932 - Hanns-G 281DPB @ 1900x1200
 Reply to chunkymonster
Anonymous   10-14-2009 at 07:53:56 PM
- 0 +

to good to be true but who knows, that will beat 5870x2 for sure but time will tell...

Reply to Anonymous
Anonymous   10-14-2009 at 07:54:43 PM
- 0 +

jennyh wrote :

Lol just no. 1680x1050 benchmarks, is that the best lcd's they have at nvidia hq?

Repeat after me - "this is bullshit".



i will repeat you are scared

Message quoted 1 times
Reply to Anonymous
Anonymous   10-14-2009 at 08:01:55 PM
- 0 +

and this is single and imagine what two of this puppies will do.. what a leap in performance but as a said before time will tell...

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Anonymous on 10-14-2009 at 08:02:16 PM
Reply to Anonymous
Harrisson   10-14-2009 at 08:06:11 PM
- 0 +

Anonymous wrote :

i will repeat you are scared


Nobody is scared of some graphic cards, but I'll play along - its hard to be scared of non-existing thing, are you scared of monster under your bed? :lol:

------------------------------ go for the 5850 now and play games while the nvidiots wait for the ceo to show an actual working product. Techpowerup's W1zzard
 Reply to Harrisson
RealityRush   10-14-2009 at 08:21:47 PM
- 0 +

Milos-stancene wrote :

5870 vs. GT300 "Fermi"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10xKBSEEvwQ



Alright, I've never hit a kid before. I mean that's like asking who Gandhi is.

Message quoted 1 times
Reply to RealityRush
warmon6   10-14-2009 at 08:48:41 PM
- 0 +

Milos-stancene wrote :

5870 vs. GT300 "Fermi"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10xKBSEEvwQ




:lol:

This is so fake i can stop laughing.

------------------------------ I blow up your reality and make my own. :gun:
 Reply to warmon6
zipzoomflyhigh   10-14-2009 at 10:13:54 PM
- 2 +

If they dont even have a real card to show, how can they have benchmarks? And if they did have these benchmarks, they wouldn't be leaked, they would be released by Nvidia to the public. Another bad fake by Nvidia.

This is a better benchmark "leaked"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8EKtCK8zbY

Word is it even comes with free woodscrews.


Message edited by zipzoomflyhigh on 10-14-2009 at 10:15:13 PM
Reply to zipzoomflyhigh
The_Blood_Raven   10-14-2009 at 10:29:47 PM
- 0 +

jennyh wrote :

It's not real, what cpu wouldnt be bottlenecked long before those fps results? The 5870 is already bottlenecked by i7's at 4ghz in some games. 75fps average in crysis at those settings? I really dont think so, an i7 would bottleneck long before that.



Is anyone else scared by how much sense Jenny has been making recently?

Anonymous wrote :

and this is single and imagine what two of this puppies will do.. what a leap in performance but as a said before time will tell...



Time will tell us this is BS...

Message quoted 2 times
Reply to The_Blood_Raven
daedalus685   10-14-2009 at 10:32:36 PM
- 0 +

The_Blood_Raven wrote :

Is anyone else scared by how much sense Jenny has been making recently?



Time will tell us this is BS...



Nah, not scared.. we all have our moments :D

Reply to daedalus685
Anonymous   10-14-2009 at 10:33:59 PM
- 0 +

The_Blood_Raven wrote :

Is anyone else scared by how much sense Jenny has been making recently?



Time will tell us this is BS...



dont be so sure you never know...

Reply to Anonymous
ubernoobie   10-14-2009 at 10:48:01 PM
- 0 +

This is BullShit

Reply to ubernoobie
Anonymous   10-14-2009 at 11:04:06 PM
- 0 +

i hope so this is not true because all ati fanboys will need time to rest a while from disaster

Reply to Anonymous
bboynatural   10-14-2009 at 11:23:08 PM
- 0 +

And you nvidia fanboy will never sleep since youl have to work over 9000 hours at your job to get the required 1000$ to get yourself this OMFG SUPER SPECIAL AWESOME computing GPU.
Repeat after me: Fkin. COMPUTING. Gpu.
Not gaming.
More fake benchs.
Well at least we have to give something to nvidia fan boys. They really do have everlasting hopes :D

Message quoted 1 times
Reply to bboynatural
Anonymous   10-14-2009 at 11:26:21 PM
- 0 +

bboynatural wrote :

And you nvidia fanboy will never sleep since youl have to work over 9000 hours at your job to get the required 1000$ to get yourself this OMFG SUPER SPECIAL AWESOME computing GPU.
Repeat after me: Fkin. COMPUTING. Gpu.
Not gaming.
More fake benchs.
Well at least we have to give something to nvidia fan boys. They really do have everlasting hopes :D



as i said before who want only the best he has money to afford it...

Reply to Anonymous
bboynatural   10-14-2009 at 11:35:18 PM
- 0 +

Well you can get the best GPU for a performance of 10 fps over ati.
If you have the money, you can pay 1000$ for that SUPER gpu.
As the father of taoism said:

One that pays 200$ more to get "only the best" obviously has no brain.

-Lao tzu

Reply to bboynatural
soundefx   10-15-2009 at 01:38:09 AM
- 0 +

Damn.. 'Leaked' on youtube.
It is either the NDA is really tight on ALL the review sites
OR
This is BS..

I wonder....??????

Reply to soundefx
bboynatural   10-15-2009 at 02:12:05 AM
- 0 +

Obvious BS man.
NO nvidia card at this point had 30fps more then ati's flagship.
Why would it change??
That would be crushing ati to the bones.

Message quoted 1 times
Reply to bboynatural
yannifb   10-15-2009 at 02:58:56 AM
- 0 +

Well the most obvious way to tell this is fake is by looking at the Crysis fps for the 5870 in that vid.... As i recall it got more than 40 fps... :pfff:

And btw to that John__ who seems to be a super nvidia fanboy - im not biased, my rig is like the UN of computing parts.

Reply to yannifb
Bronze Graphics badge TheViper   10-15-2009 at 03:37:35 AM
- 0 +

Gotta love how the

"Nvidia Test Lab
Confidential - internal use only"

pops up after 20 seconds in. Had it been real, that watermark over the graph would have always been there.

Also funny is that "Confidential - internal use only" data sheets don't come in the form of nicely made up bar graphs with background GPU images in them. They tend to just be data. The graphs get made for PR.

It's also comparing a broad named product series (GT 300) as opposed to a specific GPU (GTX 380) against a specific GPU (HD 5870).

And what's with the crazy looking SLI bridge (especially on a Tesla card)?

Reply to TheViper
IzzyCraft   10-15-2009 at 03:39:30 AM
- 0 +

bboynatural wrote :

Obvious BS man.
NO nvidia card at this point had 30fps more then ati's flagship.
Why would it change??
That would be crushing ati to the bones.


8800GT vs 2900HD anyone? Those are about the same time and if i remember 8800GT crushed the living hell out of the price/performance index and the 2k series all together ofc you could always look at 8800GTX which came before it and was still a better performer and the performance gap was quite big vs the horrible R600 chips.

Anyways at 1680x1050 30fps isn't that impressive of a gap a bais game would do that.

Benches are probably pure ***. haha still leaked on youtube and the best *** they can come up with is graphs? Not a video of a test bed doing the benchmarks. just screams i wasn't tring.

Reply to IzzyCraft
ominous prime   10-15-2009 at 03:42:15 AM
- 0 +

gamerk316 wrote :

95% chance its BS, but thing is, thats around the performance I was predicting...

And BTW, 1680x1050 is a better testing metric then 1980x1200, where the CPU comes much more into play. Really, to trully test a GPU, 800x600 should be used to ensure the CPU isn't a factor.



:lol: Should have put your sarcasm hat on gamerk, I think some people thought you were sneerious.

Reply to ominous prime
Homeboy2   10-15-2009 at 03:43:41 AM
- 0 +

RealityRush wrote :

Alright, I've never hit a kid before. I mean that's like asking who Gandhi is.



Gandhi????

Reply to Homeboy2
Jaysin   10-15-2009 at 04:12:50 AM
- 0 +

This is like a 9/11 truther video, completely lacking in the reality department.

Reply to Jaysin
randomizer   10-15-2009 at 04:12:55 AM
- 1 +

It's not from a random chinese website so it can't really be leaked. Not even Fuddo thinks it's worth posting about. It's amazing that people can post up crap on youtube and it spreads around all the major forums when there's clearly nothing credible about it.

Reply to randomizer
Ask the community Add a reply
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > GT300 "Fermi" Game Performance Figures Leaked
Go to:

There are 633 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Forum map
Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group
Page generated in 0.756 seconds
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them