Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

GT300 "Fermi" Game Performance Figures Leaked

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 3:57:43 PM

Lol just no. 1680x1050 benchmarks, is that the best lcd's they have at nvidia hq?

Repeat after me - "this is bullshit".
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 4:44:39 PM

95% chance its BS, but thing is, thats around the performance I was predicting...

And BTW, 1680x1050 is a better testing metric then 1980x1200, where the CPU comes much more into play. Really, to trully test a GPU, 800x600 should be used to ensure the CPU isn't a factor.
Related resources
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 4:45:47 PM

gamerk316 said:
95% chance its BS, but thing is, thats around the performance I was predicting...

And BTW, 1680x1050 is a better testing metric then 1980x1200, where the CPU comes much more into play. Really, to trully test a GPU, 800x600 should be used to ensure the CPU isn't a factor.


har har har :pt1cable: 

Anyway. Youtube is clearly the new anand... It isn't a leak without speaker pumping metal.
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 4:47:34 PM

gamerk316 said:
95% chance its BS, but thing is, thats around the performance I was predicting...

And BTW, 1680x1050 is a better testing metric then 1980x1200, where the CPU comes much more into play. Really, to trully test a GPU, 800x600 should be used to ensure the CPU isn't a factor.


uhh you got this wrong on so many fronts.
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 4:48:35 PM

jennyh said:
uhh you got this wrong on so many fronts.


I think even Gamerk gets to have fun with BS from time to time :p 
October 14, 2009 4:55:00 PM

Don't they call it GF100 internally? why would an internal leak have gt300 on it?
October 14, 2009 5:12:44 PM

Its a fake, plain and simple.
October 14, 2009 5:25:01 PM

gamerk316 said:
95% chance its BS, but thing is, thats around the performance I was predicting...

And BTW, 1680x1050 is a better testing metric then 1980x1200, where the CPU comes much more into play. Really, to trully test a GPU, 800x600 should be used to ensure the CPU isn't a factor.


lol you have it so twisted

&& if this turns out to be real, im pretty sure they'll mark the prices at like $800, just because they can
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 5:27:58 PM

Well, at least the blatant fakes are surfacing now. I was worried that these weren't even surfacing yet. This is the first step to credible info, next are "leaks" that are hard to tell if fake or not, then those that look semi plausible, etc.
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 5:30:31 PM

It's not real, what cpu wouldnt be bottlenecked long before those fps results? The 5870 is already bottlenecked by i7's at 4ghz in some games. 75fps average in crysis at those settings? I really dont think so, an i7 would bottleneck long before that.
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 5:31:22 PM

jennyh said:
Lol just no. 1680x1050 benchmarks, is that the best lcd's they have at nvidia hq?

Repeat after me - "this is bullshit".


Bullshit!

Anonymous
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 5:53:56 PM

to good to be true but who knows, that will beat 5870x2 for sure but time will tell...
Anonymous
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 5:54:43 PM

jennyh said:
Lol just no. 1680x1050 benchmarks, is that the best lcd's they have at nvidia hq?

Repeat after me - "this is bullshit".


i will repeat you are scared
Anonymous
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 6:01:55 PM

and this is single and imagine what two of this puppies will do.. what a leap in performance but as a said before time will tell...
October 14, 2009 6:06:11 PM

Quote:
i will repeat you are scared

Nobody is scared of some graphic cards, but I'll play along - its hard to be scared of non-existing thing, are you scared of monster under your bed? :lol: 
October 14, 2009 8:29:47 PM

jennyh said:
It's not real, what cpu wouldnt be bottlenecked long before those fps results? The 5870 is already bottlenecked by i7's at 4ghz in some games. 75fps average in crysis at those settings? I really dont think so, an i7 would bottleneck long before that.


Is anyone else scared by how much sense Jenny has been making recently?

Quote:
and this is single and imagine what two of this puppies will do.. what a leap in performance but as a said before time will tell...


Time will tell us this is BS...
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 8:32:36 PM

The_Blood_Raven said:
Is anyone else scared by how much sense Jenny has been making recently?



Time will tell us this is BS...


Nah, not scared.. we all have our moments :D 
Anonymous
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 8:33:59 PM

The_Blood_Raven said:
Is anyone else scared by how much sense Jenny has been making recently?



Time will tell us this is BS...


dont be so sure you never know...
October 14, 2009 8:48:01 PM

This is BullShit
Anonymous
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 9:04:06 PM

i hope so this is not true because all ati fanboys will need time to rest a while from disaster
October 14, 2009 9:23:08 PM

And you nvidia fanboy will never sleep since youl have to work over 9000 hours at your job to get the required 1000$ to get yourself this OMFG SUPER SPECIAL AWESOME computing GPU.
Repeat after me: Fkin. COMPUTING. Gpu.
Not gaming.
More fake benchs.
Well at least we have to give something to nvidia fan boys. They really do have everlasting hopes :D 
Anonymous
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 9:26:21 PM

bboynatural said:
And you nvidia fanboy will never sleep since youl have to work over 9000 hours at your job to get the required 1000$ to get yourself this OMFG SUPER SPECIAL AWESOME computing GPU.
Repeat after me: Fkin. COMPUTING. Gpu.
Not gaming.
More fake benchs.
Well at least we have to give something to nvidia fan boys. They really do have everlasting hopes :D 


as i said before who want only the best he has money to afford it...
October 14, 2009 9:35:18 PM

Well you can get the best GPU for a performance of 10 fps over ati.
If you have the money, you can pay 1000$ for that SUPER gpu.
As the father of taoism said:

One that pays 200$ more to get "only the best" obviously has no brain.

-Lao tzu
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2009 11:38:09 PM

Damn.. 'Leaked' on youtube.
It is either the NDA is really tight on ALL the review sites
OR
This is BS..

I wonder....??????
October 15, 2009 12:12:05 AM

Obvious BS man.
NO nvidia card at this point had 30fps more then ati's flagship.
Why would it change??
That would be crushing ati to the bones.
October 15, 2009 12:58:56 AM

Well the most obvious way to tell this is fake is by looking at the Crysis fps for the 5870 in that vid.... As i recall it got more than 40 fps... :pfff: 

And btw to that John__ who seems to be a super nvidia fanboy - im not biased, my rig is like the UN of computing parts.
a b U Graphics card
October 15, 2009 1:37:35 AM

Gotta love how the

"Nvidia Test Lab
Confidential - internal use only"

pops up after 20 seconds in. Had it been real, that watermark over the graph would have always been there.

Also funny is that "Confidential - internal use only" data sheets don't come in the form of nicely made up bar graphs with background GPU images in them. They tend to just be data. The graphs get made for PR.

It's also comparing a broad named product series (GT 300) as opposed to a specific GPU (GTX 380) against a specific GPU (HD 5870).

And what's with the crazy looking SLI bridge (especially on a Tesla card)?

October 15, 2009 1:39:30 AM

bboynatural said:
Obvious BS man.
NO nvidia card at this point had 30fps more then ati's flagship.
Why would it change??
That would be crushing ati to the bones.

8800GT vs 2900HD anyone? Those are about the same time and if i remember 8800GT crushed the living hell out of the price/performance index and the 2k series all together ofc you could always look at 8800GTX which came before it and was still a better performer and the performance gap was quite big vs the horrible R600 chips.

Anyways at 1680x1050 30fps isn't that impressive of a gap a bais game would do that.

Benches are probably pure ***. haha still leaked on youtube and the best *** they can come up with is graphs? Not a video of a test bed doing the benchmarks. just screams i wasn't tring.
October 15, 2009 1:42:15 AM

gamerk316 said:
95% chance its BS, but thing is, thats around the performance I was predicting...

And BTW, 1680x1050 is a better testing metric then 1980x1200, where the CPU comes much more into play. Really, to trully test a GPU, 800x600 should be used to ensure the CPU isn't a factor.


:lol:  Should have put your sarcasm hat on gamerk, I think some people thought you were sneerious.
October 15, 2009 1:43:41 AM

RealityRush said:
Alright, I've never hit a kid before. I mean that's like asking who Gandhi is.


Gandhi????
a b U Graphics card
October 15, 2009 2:12:50 AM

This is like a 9/11 truther video, completely lacking in the reality department.
a b U Graphics card
October 15, 2009 2:12:55 AM

It's not from a random chinese website so it can't really be leaked. Not even Fuddo thinks it's worth posting about. It's amazing that people can post up crap on youtube and it spreads around all the major forums when there's clearly nothing credible about it.
!