I'm relatively certain the GTX 260 is better bang for the buck. It will probably use a little more power, but that's what you get with a better card. The temperatures I am not sure about, I guess the 250 runs a bit cooler but that's also something that goes along with a lesser powered card. The only thing about that GTX 260 is the brand; eVGA definitely has a better reputation and "extras" (e.g. step-up program) in comparison to Palit.
I'm relatively certain the GTX 260 is better bang for the buck. It will probably use a little more power, but that's what you get with a better card. The temperatures I am not sure about, I guess the 250 runs a bit cooler but that's also something that goes along with a lesser powered card. The only thing about that GTX 260 is the brand; eVGA definitely has a better reputation and "extras" (e.g. step-up program) in comparison to Palit.
^ +1
EVGA is a much better brand but the 260 is a much more powerful card. The 260 needs a 500w power supply with 36a on the 12v rail/rails. The 250 will draw slightly less.
------------------------------EP-45 UD3R/ E8400@3.6 wZerotherm Nirvana/4gb Corsair DDR2-800/EVGA 9800GTX+/Corsair 750TX/2xWD Black AALS 640gb RAID 0+1 Windows 7/2xWD Cavier 250gb RAID 0 Windows XP Pro/Seagate 160gb Backup/X-Fi Xtreme Gamer/Logitech Z-2300/Samsung SynchMaster 906BW
Reply to anort3
Then palit gtx 260 i shall get. Thanks for the comments guys. And I think I can no longer fit an EVGA gtx 260 in my budget. It's the palit I can afford. Again, thanks!