The importan isn't always the frecuency, is the cache memory and cache shared memory.
------------------------------If you like my answer, select me as the best answer.
------------------
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.". Albert Einstein.
------------------
Reply to saint19
I was going to start a thread asking the same question, but I'm glad someone else has basically done it for me. I hope this isn't a hijack since the original poster and I essentially have the same series of chip. I have an un-OC'ed e6600, and am gaming at 1920x1080. I currently use the 8800gts 640, and, like manlaidaa, wanted to upgrade to the 5850. I have an aftermarket Zalman on the CPU, so if I throw a decent overclock to the chip, is there any good reason to think that I would see any sort of bottleneck at that resolution? From what I've read, upgrading to a quad-core cpu wouldn't *necessarily* show you better performance in games since it's not fully utilized for said purpose.
Message edited by plaid311 on 10-19-2009 at 05:48:59 PM
^Not always, GTA IV prefer the quad, but with a tri-core is enough.
------------------------------If you like my answer, select me as the best answer.
------------------
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.". Albert Einstein.
------------------
Reply to saint19
i made some benchies on it, on unigine dx 11 benchmark my rig got score 811, fps 32,2. on resident evil 5, got around 50 fps. res 1440x900, with every settings high, AAx2, AFx8.
games are more than playable, didnt notice any lag or jerkiness.
thus i finally made my conclusion that i dont need to OC my CPU at the moment.
Message edited by manlaidaa on 10-29-2009 at 11:59:39 AM
From what I see there is little difference in performance between an E6750 @ 2.66 Ghz and one @ 3.2 Ghz, 3.6 Ghz being totally useless. Really if you can get to around 3 Ghz you are doing fine.