APPROXIMATE PURCHASE DATE: (~6 weeks) BUDGET RANGE: under ~800
SYSTEM USAGE FROM MOST TO LEAST IMPORTANT: Gaming, video download/conversion, student stuff
PARTS NOT REQUIRED: Mouse, possibly case
PREFERRED WEBSITE(S) FOR PARTS: Newegg is always good, but I show no loyalties yet
PARTS PREFERENCES: no loyalties
OVERCLOCKING: Probably SLI OR CROSSFIRE: Probably not
MONITOR RESOLUTION: Hopefully 1600/1200, but mostly budget restrictive
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Quiet would be nice, but not top priority. Energy efficient would be good too. Not a serious PC gamer (yet), so I don't need top of the line. First build, looking to be able to play most modern games. Particularly like strategy, FPS, RPG and casual (Sims, Spore, etc). Game I am looking forward to most is Diablo III.
I scrounged an old Asus case, but I couldn't find any model numbers, etc. It did however still have a power supply, an ATX 115/230V 10/6A 60/50Hz 450W. I can get pics of the case, but do either of these sound like they could be reused?
I am less concerned about a strict budget and more concerned about doing it right and leaving room to upgrade down the road. My needs are not horribly demanding graphically, would I be able to get away with a single 512MB graphics card? Also, I have been reading a lot about dual vs quad core and which is best for which situation. It seems dual core is better for gaming since most games don't take advantage of quad/multi-core processors, but that the quad core would be a good investment for futureproofing and our home theatre-esque multitasking.
I have never overclocked or built a pc before, but have had several friends that have over the years, but I am almost certain overclocking is going to be done to help squeeze some more performance out of every dollar. All in all, just looking for build advice.
Also, I have seen classifieds and online custom builds that seem to have pretty fair pricing. Would you say definitively either way that building your own is more cost-effective?
Austin
SYSTEM USAGE FROM MOST TO LEAST IMPORTANT: Gaming, video download/conversion, student stuff
PARTS NOT REQUIRED: Mouse, possibly case
PREFERRED WEBSITE(S) FOR PARTS: Newegg is always good, but I show no loyalties yet
PARTS PREFERENCES: no loyalties
OVERCLOCKING: Probably SLI OR CROSSFIRE: Probably not
MONITOR RESOLUTION: Hopefully 1600/1200, but mostly budget restrictive
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Quiet would be nice, but not top priority. Energy efficient would be good too. Not a serious PC gamer (yet), so I don't need top of the line. First build, looking to be able to play most modern games. Particularly like strategy, FPS, RPG and casual (Sims, Spore, etc). Game I am looking forward to most is Diablo III.
I scrounged an old Asus case, but I couldn't find any model numbers, etc. It did however still have a power supply, an ATX 115/230V 10/6A 60/50Hz 450W. I can get pics of the case, but do either of these sound like they could be reused?
I am less concerned about a strict budget and more concerned about doing it right and leaving room to upgrade down the road. My needs are not horribly demanding graphically, would I be able to get away with a single 512MB graphics card? Also, I have been reading a lot about dual vs quad core and which is best for which situation. It seems dual core is better for gaming since most games don't take advantage of quad/multi-core processors, but that the quad core would be a good investment for futureproofing and our home theatre-esque multitasking.
I have never overclocked or built a pc before, but have had several friends that have over the years, but I am almost certain overclocking is going to be done to help squeeze some more performance out of every dollar. All in all, just looking for build advice.
Also, I have seen classifieds and online custom builds that seem to have pretty fair pricing. Would you say definitively either way that building your own is more cost-effective?
Austin