5970 benches leaked

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - 5970 benches leaked

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Page:    Previous 1 2 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

Thought you guys would like to know. Looks like one beast of a card.

http://www.guru3d.com/news/radeon- [...] surcface-/

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

bige420 wrote :

Thought you guys would like to know. Looks like one beast of a card.

http://www.guru3d.com/news/radeon- [...] surcface-/



The only intriguing thing in the whole 'article' is:

Quote :

He goes on to say, that ATI have something special up their sleeve, but are waiting for Nvidia to release their cards first.


Reply to hallowed_dragon

Yes, very interesting.

Reply to bige420

It looks to be about 3 feet long, though.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/822692.png
PhIIx3 710 @3.55ghz/1.5v w/ Scythe Samurai Zz HSF-24/49c ~ 4gb OCZ Gold XTC 5-6-6-18 @1092mhz ~ Sapphire 4870 512MB (795/1025)
Reply to JofaMang

I know, its kind of ridiculous. Probably wont fit in a lot of cases.

Reply to bige420

Many of you may be looking at those numbers as good, but I would like to share two benchmarks that I have done for comparison purposes.

Our setups are similar, both cpu's at 4.0Ghz, fast ddr 3 ram, and 2X 5870 cores.

Now these benchmarks I did with the initial driver release for the 5870 release:

http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/6492/crssssssq.th.jpg

Notice how I score higher fps, even with 4xaa (they use 2xaa) all other settings are the same.
24 min, 51 max, 40 avg.

http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/7348/stalker.th.jpg

Even if you include a some of the very low min. fps that are probably bug related....look at how much more I score in overall avg and maximum fps. Also on a side note my Stalker Clear Sky score was higher than 99.62% of all entries, check my avatar.

I think they have alot of work to do on the drivers for the X2. And yes, my cards were on stock clocks.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by annisman on 10-29-2009 at 06:16:09 PM
------------------------------ Core i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz - Gigabyte UD5 - 12GB Corsair XMS 3 - 2X ATI 58701GB Crossfire- Zalman 850W - X-FI Fatality Gamer Pro - Xigmatek Thor's Hammer - Raptor X 150 - WD Black 1TB OCZ Vertex Turbo 120 GB SSD - Cosmos S Case w/side window + 8X 120mm fans
Reply to annisman

Interesting, but the clock speeds for the cards seem kind of low to me. Lower than the base rates for the 5870.

Reply to KidHorn

annisman wrote :

Many of you may be looking at those numbers as good, but I would like to share two benchmarks that I have done for comparison purposes.

Our setups are similar, both cpu's at 4.0Ghz, fast ddr 3 ram, and 2X 5870 cores.

Now these benchmarks I did with the initial driver release for the 5870 release:

http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/8086/crsssssso.th.jpg

Notice how I score higher fps, even with 4xaa (they use 2xaa) all other settings are the same.
24 min, 51 max, 40 avg.

http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/7348/stalker.th.jpg

Even if you include a some of the very low min. fps that are probably bug related....look at how much more I score in overall avg and maximum fps. Also on a side note my Stalker Clear Sky score was higher than 99.62% of all entries, check my avatar.

I think they have alot of work to do on the drivers for the X2. And yes, my cards were on stock clocks.



Try cutting and pasting those windows out of the original SS, not very readable, even fully zoomed in, it was scaled down so far.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/822692.png
PhIIx3 710 @3.55ghz/1.5v w/ Scythe Samurai Zz HSF-24/49c ~ 4gb OCZ Gold XTC 5-6-6-18 @1092mhz ~ Sapphire 4870 512MB (795/1025)
Reply to JofaMang

The results are on preliminary "leaked" drivers so im sure there will be an improvement once official drivers are released.

Reply to bige420

I wouldn't be surprised if they have to reduce the clocks a little just to fit in under the power spec. It will be even hard (maybe even worse) for NVidia's dual card as well.


Message edited by EXT64 on 10-29-2009 at 05:18:31 PM
------------------------------ New Build : Intel Core i5 750 > Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P > 2x2GB GSkill 1600MHz CL7 1.65V > Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB >
Antec 300 Illusion > Asus 4850 512MB w/AM Cooler > Corsair 650HX > CM Hyper 212 Plus > Other: PII 940/Gigabyte 790GX/4850 1G
Reply to EXT64

JofaMang wrote :

Try cutting and pasting those windows out of the original SS, not very readable, even fully zoomed in, it was scaled down so far.



Fixed, thanks.

------------------------------ Core i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz - Gigabyte UD5 - 12GB Corsair XMS 3 - 2X ATI 58701GB Crossfire- Zalman 850W - X-FI Fatality Gamer Pro - Xigmatek Thor's Hammer - Raptor X 150 - WD Black 1TB OCZ Vertex Turbo 120 GB SSD - Cosmos S Case w/side window + 8X 120mm fans
Reply to annisman



That's what I was thinking, espescially those Stalker numbers, why such a discrepency between the X2 and two 5870's ?

------------------------------ Core i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz - Gigabyte UD5 - 12GB Corsair XMS 3 - 2X ATI 58701GB Crossfire- Zalman 850W - X-FI Fatality Gamer Pro - Xigmatek Thor's Hammer - Raptor X 150 - WD Black 1TB OCZ Vertex Turbo 120 GB SSD - Cosmos S Case w/side window + 8X 120mm fans
Reply to annisman

Maybe these aren't the famed x2's? Just a higher-end single-GPU card? (I can't see the benchmarks due to being on a school-compy, so pardon the ignorance!)


Message edited by shadow187 on 10-29-2009 at 06:24:42 PM
------------------------------ "It could also be using the testicles of squirrels but until more is known it's all supposition and guess work, best to just sit back and wait."
-MouseMonkey

 

Reply to shadow187

Seems to be a clock speed thing to me.

HD 5870:
Core Clock: 850mhz
Memory Clock: 1200mhz

HD 5970:
Core Clock: 725mhz
Memory Clock: 1000mhz

Reply to cookies

Well that's the 5850 clocks so this might be the 5950 not the 5970.

------------------------------ AMD to make $1.5bn profit Q4, *gauranteed*
Reply to jennyh

The "something special" could be a full clocked version with two 8-pin power connectors, maybe.

Reply to 1ce

Please allow me to save some readers the time of reading the article and cut right to the bottom line.

Quote :

This time AlienBabeltech received some photo's and benchmarks of an 'unknown' user with a RadeonHD 5970...at the moment it should only be taken as unconfirmed rumor so...It is unclear...that ATI have something special up their sleeve

Nothing but speculation on an unreleased product. I will wait for more reliable sources.

------------------------------ ASRock X58 Extreme - Core i7 920 - 6GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3 1600 - Sapphire 4890 2GB - Creative Xtreme Gamer - 4-80GB WD in RAID0 on HighPoint RR 2310 as OS drive - 1-320GB WD scratch drive - Corsair CMPSU 750TX - HAF 932 - Hanns-G 281DPB @ 1900x1200
Reply to chunkymonster

Holy Cow that thing is HUGE! Does it come with it's own defense system?

If I just payed $390 for a 5870, I wonder what they are going to charge for this monster? $700...... $800?

Reply to jay2tall

No wood screws? Awww, what a disappointment.

------------------------------ <GamingPC> | Cosmos 1000 Case | Zalman 850W PSU | EVGA X58 3XSLI | i7 920 OCed to 3.3GHz Stock Voltage/Fan | 6GB OCZ Platinum 1600 | Sapphire HD5870 | 2x Samsung 2343BWX (2048 x 1152) + 1x Samsung 2333HD (1080p) Eyefinity | 4x 1TB HDs in RAID 5 | Win 7 64
Reply to Zirbmonkey

Wow, that is really big. And a backplate too? I see it has a 6 and 8 pin connector, so I guess it is ok on power, but what is the PCI-E card weight spec?!?

------------------------------ New Build : Intel Core i5 750 > Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P > 2x2GB GSkill 1600MHz CL7 1.65V > Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB >
Antec 300 Illusion > Asus 4850 512MB w/AM Cooler > Corsair 650HX > CM Hyper 212 Plus > Other: PII 940/Gigabyte 790GX/4850 1G
Reply to EXT64

I bet requires room for a full length card including the support at the end. Remember those Full size Workstation cards that had the plastic extension on the end that slid into the support bracket? YEAH, except this is ALL MEAT, and no filler.

Reply to jay2tall

Phhhh... lol @ peoples trying to judge the card over some... leaked benches with beta drivers... bravo, simply bravo...

Reply to redgarl

If you want to know the real capabilities of the card, just go check the benches for two 5870 in crossfire, end of story, it will be about the same thing.

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by redgarl on 10-29-2009 at 09:47:59 PM
Reply to redgarl

annisman wrote :

That's what I was thinking, espescially those Stalker numbers, why such a discrepency between the X2 and two 5870's ?



I'm guessing it's the total power available to a single card. 5870 = 6+6pin. 5970 = 6+8pin. Sticking two fully clocked 5870 chips on a single card would pull more amps than are available in a 6+8pin line.

PCIE 2.0 = 150 watts
6pin = 75 watts
8pin = 150 watts

PCIE+6+6 = 300 watts
PCIE+6+8 = 375 watts
Going by wattage, the new 5970 only has a 25% increase in power available to it compared to a 5870. If they made the card with 8+8 pin, the power would go up to 450W in a single lane.

And honestly, you wouldn't want to pack any more heat than that into a single lane. After all: heat + high voltage = bad. At this point, it's worth reminding people that the average microwave uses about 1000W. But a microwave oven is huge, and takes up a good chunk of the kitchen counter. This is a mere 1 inch wide. There's only so much heat you can cram into a single width of your computer.

If any of you were expecting 5970 ~= 2x5870, it couldn't have happened. You can't get that much power into a single card, nor would you want to.

------------------------------ <GamingPC> | Cosmos 1000 Case | Zalman 850W PSU | EVGA X58 3XSLI | i7 920 OCed to 3.3GHz Stock Voltage/Fan | 6GB OCZ Platinum 1600 | Sapphire HD5870 | 2x Samsung 2343BWX (2048 x 1152) + 1x Samsung 2333HD (1080p) Eyefinity | 4x 1TB HDs in RAID 5 | Win 7 64
Reply to Zirbmonkey

redgarl wrote :

If you want to know the real capabilities of the card, just go check the benches for two 5870 in crossfire, end of story, it will be about the same thing.



While I generally agree with that statement.. there is noone saying that the 5970 has to be at the same clocks as the 5870. There are many factors that may lead to it being slower. We just don't know yet.

Reply to daedalus685

redgarl wrote :

If you want to know the real capabilities of the card, just go check the benches for two 5870 in crossfire, end of story, it will be about the same thing.



You do realize that's what I did earlier in the thread comparing my 2X 5870 results, and the X2 results from Guru3D... and guess what ?...... ( hold your breath).......























THE NUMBERS DON'T EQUAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That's what I've been trying to say, either thew new X2 performs worse than 2X 5870 in crossfire, OR they need to do some serious driver work.

Edit: Or these numbers are bogus.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by annisman on 10-29-2009 at 09:54:25 PM
------------------------------ Core i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz - Gigabyte UD5 - 12GB Corsair XMS 3 - 2X ATI 58701GB Crossfire- Zalman 850W - X-FI Fatality Gamer Pro - Xigmatek Thor's Hammer - Raptor X 150 - WD Black 1TB OCZ Vertex Turbo 120 GB SSD - Cosmos S Case w/side window + 8X 120mm fans
Reply to annisman

annisman wrote :

Edit: Or these numbers are bogus.



Bingo.

Reply to brockh

Bogus info... or its the 5950 (or some other model) being shown.... not the 5970. It doesn't add up.

Reply to brett1042002

Zirbmonkey wrote :


PCIE 2.0 = 150 watts
6pin = 75 watts
8pin = 150 watts

PCIE+6+6 = 300 watts
PCIE+6+8 = 375 watts


Why the HD5870 that consumes 188w need 2x 6pin?

PCIE 2.0 = 150 watts
6pin = 75 watts

PCIE+6 pin = 225w

188w < 225w ????

Reply to michaelmk86

At peak load, the 5870 will pull well over 200Watt. Especially if you try to OC it. Check Tom's Charts on power usage. It's up there.

... Unless I have the wrong power numbers for each rail and I'm adding things wrong.

------------------------------ <GamingPC> | Cosmos 1000 Case | Zalman 850W PSU | EVGA X58 3XSLI | i7 920 OCed to 3.3GHz Stock Voltage/Fan | 6GB OCZ Platinum 1600 | Sapphire HD5870 | 2x Samsung 2343BWX (2048 x 1152) + 1x Samsung 2333HD (1080p) Eyefinity | 4x 1TB HDs in RAID 5 | Win 7 64
Reply to Zirbmonkey

Zirbmonkey wrote :

At peak load, the 5870 will pull well over 200Watt


But AMD say that 188W is the Maximum.
http://www.amd.com/us/products/des [...] tions.aspx

Reply to michaelmk86

Isnt 188 more than 150?

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn

So are they dropping the x2 designation in favour of a different number that does not have the 'x2' in it, much like Nv did with the GTX295 not being called a GTX260x2? [:mousemonkey]

------------------------------ [:mousemonkey:1] http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5041/vr2009champ.jpg
Reply to mousemonkey

mousemonkey wrote :

So are they dropping the x2 designation in favour of a different number that does not have the 'x2' in it, much like Nv did with the GTX295 not being called a GTX260x2? [:mousemonkey]

 

Seems like it, yeah.

 

Unless all the naming BS was put into the drivers to confuse us all to the fact they really have a single GPU 5900 series coming (maybe released only on Mars as it is the red one..)

 

Personally I'd rather just have simple number designations as I know what I am getting anyway.. you know.. as i look it up.. Though can see why people like to tell folks on the net they use an "HD5870X2OCXTPRO Super Toxic Edition"


Message edited by daedalus685 on 10-30-2009 at 12:45:38 AM
Reply to daedalus685

Or maybe the 'surprise' means it needs a new name instead of the old x2.

Regardless, anyone who thinks this is like nvidia rebranding needs a head examination. The card isn't even out yet how can it be a 'rename' then?

------------------------------ AMD to make $1.5bn profit Q4, *gauranteed*
Reply to jennyh

ahahaha is this a joke from ati? the card looks ridiculously long almoast to the point where it's laughable

Reply to demonnn

Anyone remember this? http://www.3dfx.ch/gallery/d/31019-1/ATi+Radeon+HD+2900+XTX+1024MB+GDDR4+512Bit+Rev_A1+0704+Prototype+top.JPG :lol:

------------------------------ [:mousemonkey:1] http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5041/vr2009champ.jpg
Reply to mousemonkey

jaydeejohn wrote :

Isnt 188 more than 150?

 

150W from the slot. 75W from one six-pin connector. He's asking why it needs another.

 

Good, good call dropping the X2 moniker, though. Smart move.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by smithereen on 10-30-2009 at 02:07:13 AM
------------------------------ Phenom II X2 unlocked to four cores @ 3.8gHz,1.45V. 4GB DDR3-1600 Gigabyte 785g ATi Radeon HD4870 1GB
Run Folding@Home! Support Toms Hardware Guide, Team 40051!
CPU Buyer's Guide
Reply to smithereen



Haha I remember seeing that posted somewhere and regretting buying my 8800GTX and not waiting for the XTX version of the 2900.... that is until it never got released lol

------------------------------ Core i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz - Gigabyte UD5 - 12GB Corsair XMS 3 - 2X ATI 58701GB Crossfire- Zalman 850W - X-FI Fatality Gamer Pro - Xigmatek Thor's Hammer - Raptor X 150 - WD Black 1TB OCZ Vertex Turbo 120 GB SSD - Cosmos S Case w/side window + 8X 120mm fans
Reply to annisman

smithereen wrote :

150W from the slot. 75W from one six-pin connector. He's asking why it needs another.

Good, good call dropping the X2 moniker, though. Smart move.


So is that a +1 for err...renaming the x2's. [:mousemonkey] even though Nv did similar thing over a year ago and have got slagged off ever since.

------------------------------ [:mousemonkey:1] http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5041/vr2009champ.jpg
Reply to mousemonkey

jay2tall wrote :

Holy Cow that thing is HUGE! Does it come with it's own defense system?

If I just payed $390 for a 5870, I wonder what they are going to charge for this monster? $700...... $800?



It's usually much higher than getting two stand-alone cards in Xfire.

So if two 5870s are $800, then a 5970 (aka 5870x2) will probably cost $900 or more.

Reply to Bluescreendeath

Bluescreendeath wrote :

It's usually much higher than getting two stand-alone cards in Xfire.

So if two 5870s are $800, then a 5970 (aka 5870x2) will probably cost $900 or more.


But then it would cost the same or more than Nv have/would charge for their top of the range card and ATI would never do that because they are our friend and only make and sell cards because they love us. [:mousemonkey]

------------------------------ [:mousemonkey:1] http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5041/vr2009champ.jpg
Reply to mousemonkey

Bluescreendeath wrote :

It's usually much higher than getting two stand-alone cards in Xfire.

So if two 5870s are $800, then a 5970 (aka 5870x2) will probably cost $900 or more.


$900! I don't ever remember seeing ATI cards that high hell i don't ever remember nvidia cards costing that much 700 maybe but 900 would just be like the highest Intel CPU that's more bragging rights then anything.

Also not sure about camera angle but that card looks like it could break it's connectors off if you have a screw-less case and is stupid enough to set a dual slot gpu up without screws.

Reply to IzzyCraft

nVidia just came out with a single pcb dual also. Means nothing, even if this is correct
All cards arent the same, the TDP window is rather large for gfx cards.
I imagine having a non referenced oceed card thats a lil leaky may draw more power, and whats the oc power draw anyways?

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn



Not by me. I'm not a fan of the 295, but it has nothing to do with the name.

------------------------------ Phenom II X2 unlocked to four cores @ 3.8gHz,1.45V. 4GB DDR3-1600 Gigabyte 785g ATi Radeon HD4870 1GB
Run Folding@Home! Support Toms Hardware Guide, Team 40051!
CPU Buyer's Guide
Reply to smithereen

smithereen wrote :

Not by me. I'm not a fan of the 295, but it has nothing to do with the name.




i think he was being clever dawg

Reply to eklipz330

mousemonkey wrote :

But then it would cost the same or more than Nv have/would charge for their top of the range card and ATI would never do that because they are our friend and only make and sell cards because they love us. [:mousemonkey]


Keep telling yourself that George Burns Monkey Man. haha. I have a feeling they are holding out on the "5970" until Nvidia comes out with there stuff. And then they will strategically price it based on performance to undercut Nvidia's pricing. If the green teams "big daddy" card outperforms the "5970" they will charge you $100- less for the thing and sell a crap load of them... Why? because they can and they are already making $$$ in the 58xx cards. If it performs on par with Nvidia's high end cards, they will still sell it cheaper. If it out performs the card they will price it the same and let you choose the best card.

To bad Nvidia is putting their money into other baskets right now. Aren't they looking at making their own CPU's?

Reply to jay2tall

Ive mentioned this before, I'll do it again.
The 58xx series has been maturing all this time its been out. I know the yields arent where they want them, and TSMC needs to correct a few things there, but, by the time Fermo is released, the 58xx series will be much more mature, which means better yields, but also usually better TDPs, both of which plays into the hands of ATI, while nVidia has to still go thru its growing pains, in a slower buying time, with most likely pricy cards, lower sales, and lower production, slowing its maturation on a large slow maturing die anyways
This means, the x2 parts should be ready in plenty of time, both in yields and power, with a good supply as well


Message edited by jaydeejohn on 11-02-2009 at 04:37:08 PM
------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn

mousemonkey wrote :

But then it would cost the same or more than Nv have/would charge for their top of the range card and ATI would never do that because they are our friend and only make and sell cards because they love us. [:mousemonkey]

I guess Nvidia charges us more money than ATI because they are our enemy and only make and sell cards because they hate us?

Reply to Homeboy2
Previous
1 2
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 5970 benches leaked
Go to:

There are 861 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them