Thought you guys would like to know. Looks like one beast of a card.
http://www.guru3d.com/news/radeon- [...] surcface-/
| bige420 wrote : Thought you guys would like to know. Looks like one beast of a card.
|
The only intriguing thing in the whole 'article' is:
| Quote : He goes on to say, that ATI have something special up their sleeve, but are waiting for Nvidia to release their cards first. |
Yes, very interesting.
It looks to be about 3 feet long, though.
I know, its kind of ridiculous. Probably wont fit in a lot of cases.
Many of you may be looking at those numbers as good, but I would like to share two benchmarks that I have done for comparison purposes.
Our setups are similar, both cpu's at 4.0Ghz, fast ddr 3 ram, and 2X 5870 cores.
Now these benchmarks I did with the initial driver release for the 5870 release:
Notice how I score higher fps, even with 4xaa (they use 2xaa) all other settings are the same.
24 min, 51 max, 40 avg.
Even if you include a some of the very low min. fps that are probably bug related....look at how much more I score in overall avg and maximum fps. Also on a side note my Stalker Clear Sky score was higher than 99.62% of all entries, check my avatar.
I think they have alot of work to do on the drivers for the X2. And yes, my cards were on stock clocks.
Interesting, but the clock speeds for the cards seem kind of low to me. Lower than the base rates for the 5870.
| annisman wrote : Many of you may be looking at those numbers as good, but I would like to share two benchmarks that I have done for comparison purposes.
|
Try cutting and pasting those windows out of the original SS, not very readable, even fully zoomed in, it was scaled down so far.
not so good
The results are on preliminary "leaked" drivers so im sure there will be an improvement once official drivers are released.
I wouldn't be surprised if they have to reduce the clocks a little just to fit in under the power spec. It will be even hard (maybe even worse) for NVidia's dual card as well.
| JofaMang wrote : Try cutting and pasting those windows out of the original SS, not very readable, even fully zoomed in, it was scaled down so far. |
Fixed, thanks.
| Anonymous wrote : not so good |
That's what I was thinking, espescially those Stalker numbers, why such a discrepency between the X2 and two 5870's ?
Maybe these aren't the famed x2's? Just a higher-end single-GPU card? (I can't see the benchmarks due to being on a school-compy, so pardon the ignorance!)
Seems to be a clock speed thing to me.
HD 5870:
Core Clock: 850mhz
Memory Clock: 1200mhz
HD 5970:
Core Clock: 725mhz
Memory Clock: 1000mhz
Well that's the 5850 clocks so this might be the 5950 not the 5970.
The "something special" could be a full clocked version with two 8-pin power connectors, maybe.
Please allow me to save some readers the time of reading the article and cut right to the bottom line.
| Quote : This time AlienBabeltech received some photo's and benchmarks of an 'unknown' user with a RadeonHD 5970...at the moment it should only be taken as unconfirmed rumor so...It is unclear...that ATI have something special up their sleeve |
Nothing but speculation on an unreleased product. I will wait for more reliable sources.
Holy Cow that thing is HUGE! Does it come with it's own defense system?
If I just payed $390 for a 5870, I wonder what they are going to charge for this monster? $700...... $800?
No wood screws? Awww, what a disappointment.
Wow, that is really big. And a backplate too? I see it has a 6 and 8 pin connector, so I guess it is ok on power, but what is the PCI-E card weight spec?!?
I bet requires room for a full length card including the support at the end. Remember those Full size Workstation cards that had the plastic extension on the end that slid into the support bracket? YEAH, except this is ALL MEAT, and no filler.
Phhhh... lol @ peoples trying to judge the card over some... leaked benches with beta drivers... bravo, simply bravo...
If you want to know the real capabilities of the card, just go check the benches for two 5870 in crossfire, end of story, it will be about the same thing.
| annisman wrote : That's what I was thinking, espescially those Stalker numbers, why such a discrepency between the X2 and two 5870's ? |
I'm guessing it's the total power available to a single card. 5870 = 6+6pin. 5970 = 6+8pin. Sticking two fully clocked 5870 chips on a single card would pull more amps than are available in a 6+8pin line.
PCIE 2.0 = 150 watts
6pin = 75 watts
8pin = 150 watts
PCIE+6+6 = 300 watts
PCIE+6+8 = 375 watts
Going by wattage, the new 5970 only has a 25% increase in power available to it compared to a 5870. If they made the card with 8+8 pin, the power would go up to 450W in a single lane.
And honestly, you wouldn't want to pack any more heat than that into a single lane. After all: heat + high voltage = bad. At this point, it's worth reminding people that the average microwave uses about 1000W. But a microwave oven is huge, and takes up a good chunk of the kitchen counter. This is a mere 1 inch wide. There's only so much heat you can cram into a single width of your computer.
If any of you were expecting 5970 ~= 2x5870, it couldn't have happened. You can't get that much power into a single card, nor would you want to.
| redgarl wrote : If you want to know the real capabilities of the card, just go check the benches for two 5870 in crossfire, end of story, it will be about the same thing. |
While I generally agree with that statement.. there is noone saying that the 5970 has to be at the same clocks as the 5870. There are many factors that may lead to it being slower. We just don't know yet.
| redgarl wrote : If you want to know the real capabilities of the card, just go check the benches for two 5870 in crossfire, end of story, it will be about the same thing. |
You do realize that's what I did earlier in the thread comparing my 2X 5870 results, and the X2 results from Guru3D... and guess what ?...... ( hold your breath).......
THE NUMBERS DON'T EQUAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's what I've been trying to say, either thew new X2 performs worse than 2X 5870 in crossfire, OR they need to do some serious driver work.
Edit: Or these numbers are bogus.
Bogus info... or its the 5950 (or some other model) being shown.... not the 5970. It doesn't add up.
| Zirbmonkey wrote :
|
Why the HD5870 that consumes 188w need 2x 6pin?
PCIE 2.0 = 150 watts
6pin = 75 watts
PCIE+6 pin = 225w
188w < 225w ????
At peak load, the 5870 will pull well over 200Watt. Especially if you try to OC it. Check Tom's Charts on power usage. It's up there.
... Unless I have the wrong power numbers for each rail and I'm adding things wrong.
| Zirbmonkey wrote : At peak load, the 5870 will pull well over 200Watt |
But AMD say that 188W is the Maximum.
http://www.amd.com/us/products/des [...] tions.aspx
Isnt 188 more than 150?
So are they dropping the x2 designation in favour of a different number that does not have the 'x2' in it, much like Nv did with the GTX295 not being called a GTX260x2?

| mousemonkey wrote : So are they dropping the x2 designation in favour of a different number that does not have the 'x2' in it, much like Nv did with the GTX295 not being called a GTX260x2? |
Seems like it, yeah.
Unless all the naming BS was put into the drivers to confuse us all to the fact they really have a single GPU 5900 series coming (maybe released only on Mars as it is the red one..)
Personally I'd rather just have simple number designations as I know what I am getting anyway.. you know.. as i look it up.. Though can see why people like to tell folks on the net they use an "HD5870X2OCXTPRO Super Toxic Edition"
Or maybe the 'surprise' means it needs a new name instead of the old x2.
Regardless, anyone who thinks this is like nvidia rebranding needs a head examination. The card isn't even out yet how can it be a 'rename' then?
ahahaha is this a joke from ati? the card looks ridiculously long almoast to the point where it's laughable
| jaydeejohn wrote : Isnt 188 more than 150? |
150W from the slot. 75W from one six-pin connector. He's asking why it needs another.
Good, good call dropping the X2 moniker, though. Smart move.
| mousemonkey wrote : Anyone remember this? http://www.3dfx.ch/gallery/d/31019 [...] pe+top.JPG |
Haha I remember seeing that posted somewhere and regretting buying my 8800GTX and not waiting for the XTX version of the 2900.... that is until it never got released lol
| smithereen wrote : 150W from the slot. 75W from one six-pin connector. He's asking why it needs another.
|
So is that a +1 for err...renaming the x2's.
even though Nv did similar thing over a year ago and have got slagged off ever since.

| jay2tall wrote : Holy Cow that thing is HUGE! Does it come with it's own defense system?
|
It's usually much higher than getting two stand-alone cards in Xfire.
So if two 5870s are $800, then a 5970 (aka 5870x2) will probably cost $900 or more.
| Bluescreendeath wrote : It's usually much higher than getting two stand-alone cards in Xfire.
|
But then it would cost the same or more than Nv have/would charge for their top of the range card and ATI would never do that because they are our friend and only make and sell cards because they love us.

| Bluescreendeath wrote : It's usually much higher than getting two stand-alone cards in Xfire.
|
$900! I don't ever remember seeing ATI cards that high hell i don't ever remember nvidia cards costing that much 700 maybe but 900 would just be like the highest Intel CPU that's more bragging rights then anything.
Also not sure about camera angle but that card looks like it could break it's connectors off if you have a screw-less case and is stupid enough to set a dual slot gpu up without screws.
nVidia just came out with a single pcb dual also. Means nothing, even if this is correct
All cards arent the same, the TDP window is rather large for gfx cards.
I imagine having a non referenced oceed card thats a lil leaky may draw more power, and whats the oc power draw anyways?
| mousemonkey wrote : So is that a +1 for err...renaming the x2's. |
Not by me. I'm not a fan of the 295, but it has nothing to do with the name.
| smithereen wrote : Not by me. I'm not a fan of the 295, but it has nothing to do with the name. |
i think he was being clever dawg
| mousemonkey wrote : But then it would cost the same or more than Nv have/would charge for their top of the range card and ATI would never do that because they are our friend and only make and sell cards because they love us. |
Keep telling yourself that George Burns Monkey Man. haha. I have a feeling they are holding out on the "5970" until Nvidia comes out with there stuff. And then they will strategically price it based on performance to undercut Nvidia's pricing. If the green teams "big daddy" card outperforms the "5970" they will charge you $100- less for the thing and sell a crap load of them... Why? because they can and they are already making $$$ in the 58xx cards. If it performs on par with Nvidia's high end cards, they will still sell it cheaper. If it out performs the card they will price it the same and let you choose the best card.
To bad Nvidia is putting their money into other baskets right now. Aren't they looking at making their own CPU's?
Ive mentioned this before, I'll do it again.
The 58xx series has been maturing all this time its been out. I know the yields arent where they want them, and TSMC needs to correct a few things there, but, by the time Fermo is released, the 58xx series will be much more mature, which means better yields, but also usually better TDPs, both of which plays into the hands of ATI, while nVidia has to still go thru its growing pains, in a slower buying time, with most likely pricy cards, lower sales, and lower production, slowing its maturation on a large slow maturing die anyways
This means, the x2 parts should be ready in plenty of time, both in yields and power, with a good supply as well
mousemonkey wrote :
But then it would cost the same or more than Nv have/would charge for their top of the range card and ATI would never do that because they are our friend and only make and sell cards because they love us.
I guess Nvidia charges us more money than ATI because they are our enemy and only make and sell cards because they hate us?
There are 861 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

