What's the benefit of using integrated graphics?
How much less noise/heat/electricity would it use? I''m not sure why I wouldn't just get a 4650 for $30 paired with the cheapest motherboard, vs the integrated 785g
New Config
Cheapest AM3 motherboard
ATI 4650
Else same as old
Original Config
Items:
Antec NSK1380 Case
AMD Athlon II X2 240E
Gigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H mATX
Crucial Rendition 2GB 1X2GB PC2-6400 DDR2-800 240PIN DIMM Memory
Startech 2.5IN IDE Hard Drive Mounting Adapter for 3.5IN Drive Bay
Thanks!
Message edited by Silverforumsurfer on 10-23-2009 at 06:20:49 PM
Integrated GPU's are recommended for HTPC builds because that's all that's required to smoothly play HD content. There's no reason to get a separate card unless you're doing gaming.
Well I thought that too. But Tom's review found that only the 9400 (which is no longer around) got perfect HD quality. Xbits review found that you needed a ATI HD 4550 or better to get ideal quality (eg 118/130+).
The conclusion of the Tom's review sums it up pretty good.
"I can say without hesitation that if you choose the 780G/790GX/785G, GeForce 9300/9400, or Intel G45 IGPs for home-theater use, then you won't be disappointed."
Keep in mind, the HQV test suite is a subjective test that will vary from one reviewer to another. Also, the onboard video chips may improve their HQV results with subsequent driver releases over time as they mature. Both ATI and Nvidia are notorious for fixing things while breaking something else when drivers are updated. The 9400 chipset caveat proves that fact in the Tom's review with the newer driver not functioning properly.
The 785G only lost points on the jaggy reduction test. Otherwise it would have scored a 100. I've seen reviews of the 780G chipset getting full marks on this HQV test before, so I wouldn't put to much value on it in this case.
Get the integrated for now. If you find you can't stand the PQ, then opt for one of the low end HD5xxx cards expected early 2010. My guess is you'll be happy with the integrated video.