Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > ATI > 4650 slower than 4550!!

4650 slower than 4550!!

Forum Graphic & Displays : ATI - 4650 slower than 4550!!

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I was trying to do a small upgrade on my PC which is in a slimline box (so low profile cards) and has a 270W PSU.
I had a Diamond 4550 with 512Mb GDDR3. I decided to get something better and the only thing I could find that would fit in the box and be within reach of my PSU was an ASUS EAH4650 512 MB DDR2 .
In ALL articles I could find the 4650 DDR2 is said to be clearly faster than a 4550 DDR3.
In my PC though it is CONSISTENTLY slower. I am running windows 7 and installed Catalyst 9.10 for both cards.
I ran the windows experience index, PC wizard benchmarks, Resident evil 5 bench and in ALL of them the 4650 is SLOWER than the 4550. EG in a 1360x768 all high AAx2 RE5 fixed bench the 4550 does 18.9 FPS and the 4650 only 14.5FPS!
I would really welcome any suggestions, cause no matter the little money spent on the 4650 it SHOULD be faster than the 4550.
Thanks

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

make sure the clocks are right, take a look in the CCC or download GPU-Z

Reply to Kari

Kari wrote :

make sure the clocks are right, take a look in the CCC or download GPU-Z



Clocks are OK I think. 4550 is 600 GPU 750 mem and 4650 is 600 gpu 400 mem. I even overclocked the 4650 with ccc to 750/500 and was still a little slower than the 4550.

Reply to giouralis

giouralis wrote :

In ALL articles I could find the 4650 DDR2 is said to be clearly faster than a 4550 DDR3.



This may well be a typo, but the 4550 is available with a range of memory types. You have the GDDR3, not the DDR3 (or so you said at the beginning). GDDR and DDR are not the same.

Not sure if this would make enough difference to explain it, probably a typo anyway.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by b82 on 11-04-2009 at 08:10:16 PM
Reply to b82

1) The old card had DDR3 memory your new card has DDR2.... IE, it is slower.
2) I believe the 4650 requirements are a 400W PSU. It could be underpowered.

------------------------------ Big Brother Rules with an Iron Fist
Reply to jay2tall

b82 wrote :

This may well be a typo, but the 4550 is available with a range of memory types. You have the GDDR3, not the DDR3 (or so you said at the beginning). GDDR and DDR are not the same.

Not sure if this would make enough difference to explain it, probably a typo anyway.



It is a typo. The 4550 card is GDDR3. I thought that memory might make a difference but then in a test here http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] ,2445.html the exact 4550 card that I have is tested against a 4650 DDR2 and the 4650 is way better.

Reply to giouralis

the memory on the 4650 looks awfully slow... and it's ddr2 vs gddr3 as said before

i dont think it's a power problem, those cards just sip it a little

edit that toms article actually uses ddr2 versions for both cards
Sapphire Radeon 4650
600 MHz Core, 500 MHz Memory, 512MB DDR2
Diamond Radeon 4550
600 MHz Core, 750 MHz Memory, 512MB DDR2

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Kari on 11-04-2009 at 08:26:54 PM
Reply to Kari

jay2tall wrote :

2) I believe the 4650 requirements are a 400W PSU. It could be underpowered.


http://www.amd.com/us/products/des [...] ments.aspx
That is indeed what the manufacturer says. However here:
http://www.gpureview.com/Radeon-HD [...] d-580.html
max power draw is quoted as 48W. The GPU manufacturers ALWAYS err well on the side of caution when making power recommendations. The overall system requirements depend on the rest of the system. If you look at the recent review of the Radeon HD 5770 (much more powerful) it doesn't push a quad core system much above 200W at max load. Ignore the crossfire.
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/rade [...] 04-15.html
Yours should be less.


Message edited by b82 on 11-04-2009 at 08:27:33 PM
Reply to b82

Kari wrote :

the memory on the 4650 looks awfully slow... and it's ddr2 vs gddr3 as said before

i dont think it's a power problem, those cards just sip it a little

edit that toms article actually uses ddr2 versions for both cards
Sapphire Radeon 4650
600 MHz Core, 500 MHz Memory, 512MB DDR2
Diamond Radeon 4550
600 MHz Core, 750 MHz Memory, 512MB DDR2



The diamond on the test is this http://www.diamondmm.com/4550PE3512HS.php which is GDDR3. Diamond do not make 4550 cards ohter than GDDR3.

BUT one more comment about memory.
I observed in CCC that the 4550 is reported as 512Mb, GDDR3, 12.8Gb/s.
The 4650 is reported as 2048Mb or HyperMemory and that's all.
Is it using RAM for graphics?? and why would it do that on the 4650??

Reply to giouralis

giouralis wrote :

BUT one more comment about memory.
I observed in CCC that the 4550 is reported as 512Mb, GDDR3, 12.8Gb/s.
The 4650 is reported as 2048Mb or HyperMemory and that's all.
Is it using RAM for graphics?? and why would it do that on the 4650??



http://www.amd.com/us/products/tec [...] emory.aspx

Bingo. We're getting somewhere. Yes, for some reason it seems it is reserving ordinary RAM on the mainboard for graphics. But I don't know why that would be happening.

Edit: Actually after reading about HyperMemory more carefully, it seems it might be a technology to allow the GPU to use BOTH graphics AND onboard memory. I'm not sure about this.


Message edited by b82 on 11-04-2009 at 08:39:22 PM
Reply to b82

ok so toms has messed things up again in their reviews. lol

but that hypermemory sounds bad... I don't have any ideas why it would say that. Are there some settings in CCC about memory management or some such??

Reply to Kari

Yeah, can you turn off 'HyperMemory' in the 4650 settings and then see how it performs?


Message edited by b82 on 11-04-2009 at 08:43:15 PM
Reply to b82

Try running dxdiag (just type that into the run or search command) and see what ram it lists under the graphics tab. My 4650 DDR3 lists 512MB. You could try uninstalling and reinstalling the drivers too.

------------------------------ Intel Core i5 750 > Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P > 2x2GB GSkill 1600MHz @ 1333MHz 7-7-7-21 1.5V > Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB >
Antec 300 Illusion > Asus 4850 512MB w/AM Cooler > Corsair 650HX > CM Hyper 212 Plus > Other: PII 940/Gigabyte 790GX/4850 1G

 

Reply to EXT64

The dxdiag reports 2042Mb as Approx. Total Memory on the Display tab.

I read the AMD article and the only thing it does not say is how to DISABLE this. Any mem sharing sounds realy bad to me...

Reply to giouralis

I think you'll find this might help you turn it off:

http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=66618

If you manage to do this, then why not run DXdiag again afterwards?


Message edited by b82 on 11-04-2009 at 08:50:46 PM
Reply to b82

That is unsettling, as it certainly sounds like it is sharing memory (which would slow it down tremendously.

 

As for disabling it, I saw someone say that ATI tray tools could disable it, but that was years ago so I don't know if it still works.

 

edit: b82's article is the one I was referring to


Message edited by EXT64 on 11-04-2009 at 08:52:50 PM
------------------------------ Intel Core i5 750 > Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P > 2x2GB GSkill 1600MHz @ 1333MHz 7-7-7-21 1.5V > Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB >
Antec 300 Illusion > Asus 4850 512MB w/AM Cooler > Corsair 650HX > CM Hyper 212 Plus > Other: PII 940/Gigabyte 790GX/4850 1G

 

Reply to EXT64

Yeah, I just read it more thoroughly too. Later down that forum the evidence comes in in favour of leaving Hyper Memory ON.

I think you should get it turned OFF while we troubleshoot the use of Graphics RAM, then once we've sorted that out, consider turning the HyperMemory back on.

The correct drivers are definitely installed? 64 bit or 32 bit?

Reply to b82

Run Gpu-z and report both the core speed, memory speed, RAM, and bandwidth --- basically the specs that your 4650 is showing.

The fact that you said 400Mhz earlier for memory speed doesn't seem right, i am curious of the bandwidth. If the system is simply not reading your card right that could be the problem, or the card itself is bad. Check on the retail box (or from wherever you bought it) that the clocks are as advertised as well (this will give you a potential reason to RMA).

Reply to hardwaretechy

The drivers are good 32bit latest CCC (9.10).

I think in CCC to disable this HyperMem is hidden under some other name...

As for the advertised vs actual clocks they are correct i.e. as advertised by ASUS and reported by CPUZ. I thought of the bad card thing but it seems to be the mem sharing or some mem related issue.
I am looking in CCC now to disable this.

Reply to giouralis

Look for "Enable/Disable ATT Shared Memory" or similar name.

Reply to b82

Get your money back if you can and look for a DDR3 variant.

Reply to nforce4max

Download GPU-Z and see what that says too. I think in Win7, CPU-Z reports the correct frequency, which should downclock to very low levels when not in use. You could try driver 9.9 or 9.8 also (doing a reinstall of the drivers rarely hurts).

------------------------------ Intel Core i5 750 > Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P > 2x2GB GSkill 1600MHz @ 1333MHz 7-7-7-21 1.5V > Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB >
Antec 300 Illusion > Asus 4850 512MB w/AM Cooler > Corsair 650HX > CM Hyper 212 Plus > Other: PII 940/Gigabyte 790GX/4850 1G

 

Reply to EXT64

I think we're making this too complicated... The memory is slower which would explain the performance disparity. Return the card and find a GDDR3 variant. The shared memory isn't affecting anything.

Reply to brockh

People w/ DDR3 variants have similar issues with shared mem. They do not have performance comparisons so they may well be seeing lower performance than what is expected of these cards.
As said in all tests a 4650 DDR2 always comes out faster than a 4550 GDDR3. If it were any other way I would not have bought this card and I would not be talking about this issue.

But from my experience if you come up to something like this you either spend a few days figuring it out and learning a lot OR you 've made a very bad choice... I am hoping for the first!

Reply to giouralis

Don't use shared mem since it creates more over heard for the cpu since if any thing wants to get to the system ram it first has to go to the cpu. Turn off shred mem. Hypermemory sucks period no matter what budget or use.

Reply to nforce4max

nforce4max wrote :

Don't use shared mem since it creates more over heard for the cpu since if any thing wants to get to the system ram it first has to go to the cpu. Turn off shred mem. Hypermemory sucks period no matter what budget or use.



Any ideas how???
I looked everywhere in the BIOS, changed everything, have rebooted about 50 times in the last hour but I cannot find any setting that will allow me to prevent the card from sharing memory.

I have an ASUS P5QL motherboard.

Reply to giouralis

giouralis wrote :

As said in all tests a 4650 DDR2 always comes out faster than a 4550 GDDR3. If it were any other way I would not have bought this card and I would not be talking about this issue.



In which tests? Can you please link directly to them? Are they using anti-aliasing in the benchmarks? What resolution are they running at? A lot of variables could cause this -- only rarely are things so "cut and dry" with two cards so closely together using different memory configurations.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by brockh on 11-04-2009 at 10:59:33 PM
Reply to brockh

brockh wrote :

In which tests? Can you please link directly to them? Are they using anti-aliasing in the benchmarks? What resolution are they running at? A lot of variables could cause this -- only rarely are things so "cut and dry" with two cards so closely together using different memory configurations.



I posted a link before. Here it is again. http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] ,2445.html

Reply to giouralis

It could also be because the bits for the memory are lower.

ex. 4550 - 128bit memory bus vs. 4650 64-bit memory loss.

That would definitely be a problem.

Reply to LivingOnMyPC

giouralis wrote :

Any ideas how???
I looked everywhere in the BIOS, changed everything, have rebooted about 50 times in the last hour but I cannot find any setting that will allow me to prevent the card from sharing memory.

I have an ASUS P5QL motherboard.



OK then you have no other choice to either live with it or return it and get your money back. This card is a pos headache in a box and it shouldn't have been sold. Try another ATI from a different brand or go Nvidia with its premiums.

Reply to nforce4max

LivingOnMyPC wrote :

It could also be because the bits for the memory are lower.

ex. 4550 - 128bit memory bus vs. 4650 64-bit memory loss.

That would definitely be a problem.



Good point. I will keep looking into the sharing mem thing cause I do feel it's a problem but I think I just have to accept that this card most likely IS slower despite its better GPU.

Reply to giouralis

I am not sure of the bus size of those cards, but I am sure that the 4650 has at least the same or larger memory bus than the 4550. In fact I think the 4650 is 128bit and the 4550 is 64 bit.

I had a 4650 DDR2 and was not at all impressed with it, but it definitely should be faster than a 4550. That said, I dont know why AMD puts DDR3 on a lower end card and DDR2 on the 4650.

Reply to frozentundra123456

Theres a huge performance difference between a video card with DDR2 of RAM and gDDR3 RAM.

Reply to stridervm

Can a mod please close this thread. Come on people why is it so hard to figure out the differences between the two types or memory? :fou:

One type uses 16bit channels while the other uses 32bit and has higher clocks with better i/o.

Reply to nforce4max

Wait, are you saying the 4650 DDR2 is only a 64 bit memory bus? I know the 4650 DDR3 has 128 bit. if that's the case, that will cripple the card.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by EXT64 on 11-05-2009 at 04:47:53 AM
------------------------------ Intel Core i5 750 > Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P > 2x2GB GSkill 1600MHz @ 1333MHz 7-7-7-21 1.5V > Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB >
Antec 300 Illusion > Asus 4850 512MB w/AM Cooler > Corsair 650HX > CM Hyper 212 Plus > Other: PII 940/Gigabyte 790GX/4850 1G

 

Reply to EXT64

EXT64 wrote :

Wait, are you saying the 4650 DDR2 is only a 64 bit memory bus? I know the 4650 DDR3 has 128 bit. if that's the case, that will cripple the card.



Yes. I guess that's the case. So the card is a crippled 4650.

Any comments on how to disable the HyperMemory sharing?? I would rather have this card just use its own mem and not take up my normal ram too.
I have been looking around in forums and tech supports but I can't find any solid solution to this.

ASUS says nothing about this on the spec page and neither does ATI. If this thing is going to share my ram it should say.


Reply to giouralis

Did you try the ATI Tray Tools? That is the only time I have heard of a way to disable it.

------------------------------ Intel Core i5 750 > Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P > 2x2GB GSkill 1600MHz @ 1333MHz 7-7-7-21 1.5V > Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB >
Antec 300 Illusion > Asus 4850 512MB w/AM Cooler > Corsair 650HX > CM Hyper 212 Plus > Other: PII 940/Gigabyte 790GX/4850 1G

 

Reply to EXT64

Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > ATI > 4650 slower than 4550!!
Go to:

There are 1003 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them