SYSTEM USAGE FROM MOST TO LEAST IMPORTANT: Playing WoW and various FPS, internet browsing, various office productivity tasks
PARTS NOT REQUIRED: (e.g.: keyboard, mouse, monitor, speakers, OS) Don't need kb/mouse/speakers, hard drive, or CD/DVD drive.
PREFERRED WEBSITE(S) FOR PARTS: Newegg, but I don't care that much so long as it all comes from the same place.
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN: California, USA
PARTS PREFERENCES: My current monitor is failing, so I'd like a 20+ inch LCD monitor with 1080P resolution. I'd like to use an AMD processor but it's not required if Intel is a better deal.
OVERCLOCKING: Maybe
SLI OR CROSSFIRE: Maybe, if possible and practicable within my price range.
MONITOR RESOLUTION: 1080P (1920x1080), possible dual monitor with 1280x1024
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: I'm trying to upgrade from the following rig, which is choking on multitasking:
Intel C2D E6320 (1.86ghz)
2GB DDR2 (Mushkin)
BFG GeForce 8800 GT OC 512MB
XFX mainboard (I forget the model, but it's about 2 years old and supports SLI)
Generic case and PSU
Message edited by sanguines on 10-26-2009 at 09:52:44 PM
Currently, I'm using Windows 7 RC, but I will be moving to Vista Ultimate x64 shortly.
NOOOooo...! Dont even think about Vista. Get Win 7 or fall back to XP. Look at the article Toms wrote today. Win 7 is 7-10% faster than Vista. Vista will just make your problem worse.
Quote :
Do you think that the aforementioned Athlon II is a large enough performance increase over the E6320 to justify the price?
The Athlon suggested is a quad core so it should multi-task better. Unfortunately I dont know enough about older intel CPUs to know if there is a nice 2.6+GHz quad core you could just drop in that would be nearly as good as the AthlonIIx4.
NOOOooo...! Dont even think about Vista. Get Win 7 or fall back to XP. Look at the article Toms wrote today. Win 7 is 7-10% faster than Vista. Vista will just make your problem worse.
The Athlon suggested is a quad core so it should multi-task better. Unfortunately I dont know enough about older intel CPUs to know if there is a nice 2.6+GHz quad core you could just drop in that would be nearly as good as the AthlonIIx4.
I just finished reading that article, actually! Yowch. I'm not gonna shell out for 7 right now - XP it is, which is disappointing, because XP x64 is fail, IIRC.
Supported CPU
CPU Socket Type LGA 775
CPU Type Core 2 Extreme (dual and quad core) / Core 2 Duo / Core 2 Quad / Celeron D / Pentium 4 / Pentium 4 / Pentium D 9XX / Pentium D 8XX
FSB 1333/1066MHz
Chipsets
North Bridge NVIDIA nForce 680i LT SLI
If you are running XP then 2GB RAM is not likely to be a problem, 4GB RAM would be the most you could use. 4GB would let you run windows 7 really nicely, especially with a quad CPU.
1.8GHz is alot slower than 2.8GHz and dual core doesnt multitask near as well as quad core.
It is possible your HDD is a problem. Is it over half full? what kind is it?
Also can you link your motherboard so I could see all the specs.
If you are running XP then 2GB RAM is not likely to be a problem, 4GB RAM would be the most you could use. 4GB would let you run windows 7 really nicely, especially with a quad CPU.
1.8GHz is alot slower than 2.8GHz and dual core doesnt multitask near as well as quad core.
It is possible your HDD is a problem. Is it over half full? what kind is it?
Also can you link your motherboard so I could see all the specs.
The hard drive is a Seagate 1TB 7200rpm SATA drive, with only one partition for the full size of the drive. I don't have a link to a model number, but it's far less than half full (perhaps 1/8 - I store most of my non-program data on an external USB drive).
I'm having issues logging into newegg right now so I can't link the motherboard.
Unless your Seagate is one of the ones with a firmware problem, it wont be an issue. You might google about the seagate 7200 firmware problem and see if there is anything that might apply to you.
I would think a nice quad CPU would make it feel like a new machine. If you added 2GB more RAM and windows 7 it would be like a new machine.
The 8800 will drive a 22 inch 1380x1050 monitor at around high graphics levels on most games if you turn AA and a couple memory intensive settings off (I can with a 9800 GTX+ on a dual core Athlon at 3.2GHz). I just got this good deal on a HannsG 22inch LCD. I like it (had it less than a week), but its not 1080 like you want.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6824254035
Message edited by dndhatcher on 10-27-2009 at 01:42:46 AM