Nvidia back to making a profit.

jennyh

Splendid
Nvidia are actually doing ok because Tegra is pretty decent. This is probably what made them abandon the desktop graphics market - there is more money to be made elsewhere eventually and they have no competition in other markets yet.
 
Hah, that's probably because they aren't spending money making costly G200 chips anymore but rather selling the ones they have. I'm sure they would love to be spending money making G300 chips, but TSMC ain't exactly helping with that right now ^_^.
 

jennyh

Splendid
Actually no, the margins are about the same and AMD would have made a profit in Q3 except for paying global foundries R&D.

Nvidia wishes it was in the position to pay fab R&D.
 
Don't forget people, NVIDIA can afford to be unprofitable, AMD can't. Say what you will, AMD needs to turn a profit NOW. They have superiority in the GPU market, and are very competitive in the CPU market. They won't be able to hold their increased share unless they start to turn a profit while they have a chance.

We'll see. Q1 results will be quite interesting...
 

KidHorn

Distinguished
Oct 8, 2009
269
0
18,790


NVidia has basically no debt, so there's no one they would need bankruptcy protection from. Plus they have a lot of cash.

AMD, on the other hand, has a ton of debt.
 

KidHorn

Distinguished
Oct 8, 2009
269
0
18,790


Both companies have to invest a lot in R&D. It's the nature of high tech product development.

Your statement makes as much sense as saying MCDonalds would have made a lot more profit if they didn't have to pay for beef.
 

jennyh

Splendid
You thought wrong then. :p AMD controls 34% of GlobalFoundries, soon to be the worlds second largest foundry and possibly the first to 28 and 22nm.

AMD actually has more fabs now that it ever did since the Chartered buyout by ATIC. As stranger alluded to, Nvidia don't have any fabs of their own to pay R&D towards, and probably never will. In fact, Nvidia will quite likely end up a customer of GlobalFoundries within 1 year.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_foundries
 

It's not likely that GlobalFoundries will beat (or even be that close to beating) Intel to 22nm. Intel has demonstrated far more extensive 22nm capability at this point. On the other hand, they may well win to 28nm.
 
Problem with all this speculation is, the game as we know it, for sure, has changed.
No longer is GF constrained in monies like before, so, actually, they should do better to all next process' unlike before, when AMD had little monies for commitment to this (see my link earlier)
 

jennyh

Splendid
In 2012 GF And Intel will be almost identical in fab output.

AMD will sell cpu's at break-even point (or even a small loss) simply to diminish intels business. They did it with Nvidia, they will do it intel too. It will be a great time for consumers as well, and a lot of people will understand what a strong AMD really means for the first time.
 

I sincerely hope you are correct. However, GlobalFoundries has not shown a working 22nm full wafer yet, while Intel has.
 

More money than they used to have, absolutely. More money than Intel? Not even close.