One is 10 bucks more than the other and one is named "489X-ZSFC" and the other is "489A-ZDFC". That's about all I see...even though when I click Specs and one has a few more things different than another, I don't get what they mean...
Just checked XFX site and the only 2 differences are:
HD-489A-ZDFC has the game "HAWK" bundled and its dimensions are 9.5 x 4.376 x 3.8
and the HD-489X-ZSFC hasn't any bundled games and its dimensions are 9.5 X 4.376 X 1.5
I could have sworn I answered this question 3 days ago......... one runs @ 3600 one @ 3900........ the second one........ you can also set the fan speed in the ccc to run at 37% and it will keep the card cooler and push the hot air out of your case vs the other one.
I could have sworn I answered this question 3 days ago......... one runs @ 3600 one @ 3900........ the second one........ you can also set the fan speed in the ccc to run at 37% and it will keep the card cooler and push the hot air out of your case vs the other one.
I see. What if you compare those two XFX's to these two HIS's. The HIS seem cheaper yet the clock on it is the same or better.
seems as if the Turbo+ performs the same as the $200+ one yet it is cheaper. What you think? Which of these four is worth the buy. Btw, im running on 1920x1080 full HD 23'' monitor, i5 processor, 4 gig ram, 700w psu, win7 32 bit. Im mainly using it for recent games, Fallout 3, Assassins Creed II, CoDMW2, etc.