Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

I5-2500k vs i5-2550k Better for OC Gaming

Last response: in Overclocking
Share
March 18, 2012 2:01:32 AM

I want to replace my old desktop components with new. One of which is an OC processor so I can play SWTOR at max settings with no problem. Which one would be better the i5-2500k or the i5-2550k?

More about : 2500k 2550k gaming

March 18, 2012 2:26:20 AM

only difference butween i5-2500k and i5-2550k is .1ghz
i would save 10 bucks and buy a i5-2500k and use the money u saved to buy a cpu cooler
m
0
l

Best solution

March 18, 2012 2:30:30 AM

I would choose the 2550k, it doesn't have integrated graphics so you can achieve higher clock speeds. Plus, you get more transistors on the chip than the 2500k because of the lack of integrated graphics. I'm assuming you are upgrading your PSU and video card as well, if no video card than you should get the 2500k because of the integrated graphics processor. Although the IGP will not play SWTOR at max.

To summarize I suggest a new GPU, PSU, and a 2550k. (And MOBO if you don't already have one) I also would suggest the corsair H80 or H60 for you CPU cooling so you can have a more stable OC (liquid cooling does not have as much temperature fluctuation as aluminum heat-sinks.)
Share
Related resources
a b à CPUs
a b K Overclocking
March 18, 2012 2:33:46 AM

The 2550K is 100 MHz faster than the 2500K and has no IGPU so there are no native graphics. If you're a serious gamer the 2550K is a better gaming chip as you will be using a discrete GPU. But the difference is minimal.
m
0
l
March 18, 2012 3:39:59 AM

just to clarify, the 2550K just has the graphics core disabled. it's physically still there. some believe this may provide higher clocks, i believe it's just a way to squeeze more money out of the consumer. unless you want the absolute maximum overclock, i suggest saving the $10 and putting towards an aftermarket cooler as bestlink101 suggested.
m
0
l
March 18, 2012 4:09:00 AM

Ok so it still seems up in the air for now. So how about this, how much better would the i7-2600k, i7-2700k, or i7-3930k be when compared to the 2500k? And are the 6 cores worth having for the future when we start really using them? Should I forego them for a cheaper processor??
m
0
l
March 18, 2012 4:38:38 AM

Best answer selected by Schube30.
m
0
l
a c 95 à CPUs
a c 224 K Overclocking
March 18, 2012 1:15:56 PM

@Schube30 The information you are getting regarding the 2550K is assumptions and not accurate, the 2500K is a much even across the board overclocker, I actually know from my own experience, because I own both and have individually tested both.

I already had the 2500K and bought the 2550K to upgrade my wifes platform, but if the 2550K was a better overclocker I was going to keep it myself and give her the 2500K, the 2550K is a horrible overclocker very tempermental, so my wife gets the 2550K as planned because I won't be overclocking her new build.

She is not getting my 2500K that bad boy is staying right where it is!

For overclocking purposes I 100% recommend the 2500K over the 2550K! Ryan
m
0
l
March 19, 2012 1:58:42 PM

FWIW, using the 2500K with its HD3000 integrated graphics I played SWTOR on max settings (with shadows and AA turned off) on a 32" HDTV with a 768 resolution and it was smooth as butter. That said, I did overclock the CPU to 4.5 and the integrated graphics to 1450 before doing so.

If you're using a 1080 monitor, you'll probably be stuck on low or medium settings.

That being said, I got a MSI 560Ti and now I'm playing BF3 on max settings and I haven't logged on to play SWTOR since :) .
m
0
l
!